On 09/03/2007 12:20 PM, Sjoerd Hiemstra wrote:
Nelson A. de Oliveira:
Mumia W..:
See if you can get the barcode font embedded in the PDF file.
The PDF is generated by a third part online system that we use here.
We don't have control over the PDF.
We want to change all machines ru
Nelson A. de Oliveira:
> Mumia W..:
> > See if you can get the barcode font embedded in the PDF file.
>
> The PDF is generated by a third part online system that we use here.
> We don't have control over the PDF.
> We want to change all machines running Windows to Lin
On 09/02/2007 08:24 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
The PDF is generated by a third part online system that we use here.
We don't have control over the PDF.
We want to change all machines running Windows to Linux, but the only
missing thing is this barcode font on the PDFs. Windows dis
onts/truetype/ttf-barcod25/Bar25ifh.ttf
Family = Bar.25i.f.HR
FontName = Bar25ifHR-Regular
Encoding = Unicode
Location = English
Charset = ISO8859-1
GeneralFamily = Roman
Weight = Medium
Width = Variable
Shape = Normal Upright
Priority = 20
end
Installed the font as
/usr/share/f
On 09/02/2007 02:19 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Hi Mumia!
On 9/2/07, Mumia W.. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure.
The PDF you can get here http://naoliv.googlepages.com/giap.pdf (size
is 146k) and the font here http://naoliv.googlepages.com/Bar25if.ttf
(24k).
The barcode should app
Hi Mumia!
On 9/2/07, Mumia W.. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sure.
> > The PDF you can get here http://naoliv.googlepages.com/giap.pdf (size
> > is 146k) and the font here http://naoliv.googlepages.com/Bar25if.ttf
> > (24k).
> >
> > The barcode should
On 09/02/2007 12:21 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Hi Mumia!
On 9/2/07, Mumia W.. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If it doesn't contain private data, you could send both the PDF and the
TTF file to me, and I'll try to see what it takes to get the font rendered.
Sure.
The PDF
Hi Mumia!
On 9/2/07, Mumia W.. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a PDF (http://naoliv.googlepages.com/giap.pdf) that uses a
> > Bar25if font (http://naoliv.googlepages.com/Bar25if.ttf).
> >
> > Installing it to a directory /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-barcod
On 09/02/2007 03:23 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
(CC me on answers, please)
Sure.
Hi!
Hi Nelson.
I have a PDF (http://naoliv.googlepages.com/giap.pdf) that uses a
Bar25if font (http://naoliv.googlepages.com/Bar25if.ttf).
Installing it to a directory /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf
(CC me on answers, please)
Hi!
I have a PDF (http://naoliv.googlepages.com/giap.pdf) that uses a
Bar25if font (http://naoliv.googlepages.com/Bar25if.ttf).
Installing it to a directory /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-barcod25
and registering it with "defoma-font reregister-all
ttf-barcod25.
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> If I just knew how gdm picks what fonts it uses, I'd be well on my way
> to figuring this out. In the olden days, I used to edit my xfs
> configuration to select 100 dpi fonts over 75 dpi fonts, but my font
> path (as shown with xset -q) does actually alr
ot something in my own personal settings, because the font used to
> echo my username and draw the bullets when I type my password in gdm
> have also shrunk.
I am moving from Testing to Stable, and my Testing has the same problem. The
cause, I inferred from "xdpyinfo", was that Stable i
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:54:32 -0400
Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Any application for which I specify fonts explicitly with my X
> resources remains the same (xterm, emacs, etc.). The default font
> size has shrunk for gdm, sawfish, and iceweasel. I
as changed too much, and I no longer know where to look. My
screen resolution has not changed, and my X server knows the correct
dimensions of my monitor and has an accurate DPI calculation. It is
not something in my own personal settings, because the font used to
echo my username and draw the bu
Wow!
That's it! Worked like a charm! Thank you so much!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:04:09 + (UTC)
Amit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok I tried putting it in .Xdefaults. This is my current .Xdefaults:
>
> xterm*background: black
> xterm*foreground: white
> xterm*cursorColor: SkyBlue
> xterm*font: -bitstream-bitstream vera s
Ok I tried putting it in .Xdefaults. This is my current .Xdefaults:
xterm*background: black
xterm*foreground: white
xterm*cursorColor: SkyBlue
xterm*font: -bitstream-bitstream vera sans mono-medium-r-normal-
*-14-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
xterm*ScrollBar: off
xterm*SaveLines: 2500
Xft.antialias: 1
Xft.dpi
Amit Uttamchandani:
>> Xft.antialias: 1
>> Xft.dpi: 93
>> Xft.hinting: 1
>> Xft.hintstyle: hintfull
>> Xft.rgba: rgb
>>
> Thank you for your suggestions. I will try this out. I am by the way using DWM
> for my window manager and I have an .Xdefaults file
> Xft.antialias: 1
> Xft.dpi: 93
> Xft.hinting: 1
> Xft.hintstyle: hintfull
> Xft.rgba: rgb
>
Thank you for your suggestions. I will try this out. I am by the way using DWM
for my window manager and I have an .Xdefaults file with some xterm font
settings. Should I put your co
Amit Uttamchandani:
>
> Anyways, font smoothing has been working quite well on this laptop screen
> except
> for xterm. I finally figured out how to change the font in xterm to bitstream
> vera sans mono but the fonts in xterm look jagged and terrible in this screen.
Put
X
Amit Uttamchandani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey guys,
>
> Been happily using debian etch for over a month now!
>
> What an amazing system this is.
>
> Anyways, font smoothing has been working quite well on this laptop
> screen except for xterm. I finally figu
On 08/13/2007 07:36 PM, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> Anyways, font smoothing has been working quite well on this laptop screen
> except
> for xterm. I finally figured out how to change the font in xterm to bitstream
> vera sans mono but the fonts in xterm look jagged and terrible in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/13/07 19:36, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Been happily using debian etch for over a month now!
>
> What an amazing system this is.
>
> Anyways, font smoothing has been working quite well on this laptop s
Hi Amit.
Amit Uttamchandani, 14.08.2007 02:36:
> I know I could use the GNOME terminal or Konsole but they are not as quick as
> xterm. Any other alternatives that you guys suggest?
I switched to xfce4-terminal and am happy with it. It has some fancy stuff, a
configurable interface and is damn fa
Hey guys,
Been happily using debian etch for over a month now!
What an amazing system this is.
Anyways, font smoothing has been working quite well on this laptop screen except
for xterm. I finally figured out how to change the font in xterm to bitstream
vera sans mono but the fonts in xterm
>
>
> Really? I find that fonts are fuzzier without hinting.
Other fonts, however, look much better with the autohinter (which is turned
on using "dpkg-reconfigurew fontconfig-config") on.
tatement. Arial is ugly on Linux *with
> the autohinter on*.
Really? I find that fonts are fuzzier without hinting.
But maybe the GNOME Font "hinting" selector is different than what
you are referring to.
> I just guess I'll file a bug asking for Arial substitutions
> Ugly? No. xmms (a Gtk 1.2 app) has ugly fonts.
>
> Preferring Bitstream Vera Sans over Arial is just (valid) personal
> opinion.
Well, I guess I should qualify my statement. Arial is ugly on Linux *with
the autohinter on*.
I just guess I'll file a bug asking for Arial substitutions in the de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/07 11:59, Tim Hull wrote:
>> Font server? Who needs to use xfs in 2007?
>
>
> I guess I misspoke - I'm just using the default font configuration
> toolchain.
>
> Anyway... I must be misunderstanding s
>
> Font server? Who needs to use xfs in 2007?
I guess I misspoke - I'm just using the default font configuration
toolchain.
Anyway... I must be misunderstanding something. Or don't recognize
> Arial's pervasiveness.
>
> I know this is going to sound stupid,
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 04:01:51 -0400, Zach wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >
> > Version 7.2 of Xorg includes the default font paths automatically now,
> > so most of these lines are not needed anymore in the "Files" section of
> > xorg.conf:
>
Jonathan Kaye wrote:
Yes, Takehiko. I removed all the font paths from xorg.conf and now
my Xorg.0.log looks exactly like yours and the fonts seem ok so
far. You were perfectly correct. Thanks I learned something.
I merely observed that [a] I never touched FontPath and my xorg.conf
doesn&#
gt;> From /usr/share/doc/xorg/changelog.Debian.gz :
>>
>> | * Don't write the files section of xorg.conf by default. If the user
>> | does want to write the files section, don't write out any font
>> | paths, only write out the font server bit if they specify that.
>&g
Don't write the files section of xorg.conf by default. If the user
> | does want to write the files section, don't write out any font
> | paths, only write out the font server bit if they specify that.
> | + This will depend on having xserver-xorg-core version
> | 2:1.3.0
On 8/9/07, Jonathan Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well there's one quick way to find out. Assuming you have the correct font
> packages installed, then just add the font directories in my or Mumia's
> xorg.conf files that we've posted on this thread. Stop a
On 8/8/07, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Version 7.2 of Xorg includes the default font paths automatically now,
> so most of these lines are not needed anymore in the "Files" section of
> xorg.conf:
I checked apt-cache for xserver-xorg and you'
On 08/09/2007 01:30 AM, Zach wrote:
On 8/8/07, Mumia W.. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
xset q
xlsfonts
The first command shows X settings, and the second one shows the fonts
that X recognizes. This information helps in debugging the problem.
Ok here is that output:
http://pastebin.ca/65081
Zach wrote:
> Someone said the new version of the X.Org xserver no longer puts the
> Font lines in the xorg.conf file. I wonder where it puts them? I just
> remember one of the packages that it upgraded was xserver-xorg yet it
> didn't show anything on stdout indicating it
Zach wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Jonathan Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Zach,
>> I had a look at your xorg.conf file that you pasted up and I'm not
>> surprised you're having font problems. There's nothing in the fonts
>> section of yo
On 8/8/07, Mumia W.. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I read your long post at break-neck speed with 20% comprehension, so
> forgive me if I got this wrong, but you claimed that you removed some of
> the font paths. To me it looks like you removed all of them, or perhaps
> a bug
On 8/8/07, Jonathan Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Zach,
> I had a look at your xorg.conf file that you pasted up and I'm not surprised
> you're having font problems. There's nothing in the fonts section of your
> config file. You have:
> ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/08/07 23:03, Tim Hull wrote:
>>
>> DE? Window manager?
>
>
> I'm using GNOME 2.18 w/ Metacity, though it shouldn't matter - I want to
> change the font server aliases, not the GNOME font settings.
Font ser
>
>
> DE? Window manager?
I'm using GNOME 2.18 w/ Metacity, though it shouldn't matter - I want to
change the font server aliases, not the GNOME font settings.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/08/07 22:15, Tim Hull wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Debian (both Etch and Lenny), I've noticed that in many applications
> where the "Arial" font is used, the system reverts to an extremely ugly
> bitmap Helvetica if Aria
Hi,
On Debian (both Etch and Lenny), I've noticed that in many applications
where the "Arial" font is used, the system reverts to an extremely ugly
bitmap Helvetica if Arial isn't installed. However, I would like the system
to substitute Bitstream Vera Sans instead. How can I do this?
Tim
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 06:10:07 +0200, Zach wrote:
> I'm having a font problem, can someone take a look at my paste:
> http://pastebin.ca/649456
>
> Thanks,
> Zach
Just on an offshot guess, how's your screen resolution overall - while it
may seem to be OK in your vari
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 07:27:50 +0200, Jonathan Kaye wrote:
> Zach wrote:
>
> > I'm having a font problem, can someone take a look at my paste:
> > http://pastebin.ca/649456
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Zach
> Hi Zach,
> I had a look at your xorg.con
On 08/07/2007 11:01 PM, Zach wrote:
I'm having a font problem, can someone take a look at my paste:
http://pastebin.ca/649456
Thanks,
Zach
Again, you wrote:
i did an upgrade last night and also installed some new packages
and now my fonts aren't correct, i checked in gnome-te
Zach wrote:
> I'm having a font problem, can someone take a look at my paste:
> http://pastebin.ca/649456
>
> Thanks,
> Zach
Hi Zach,
I had a look at your xorg.conf file that you pasted up and I'm not surprised
you're having font problems. There's nothing in th
I'm having a font problem, can someone take a look at my paste:
http://pastebin.ca/649456
Thanks,
Zach
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey guys,
I've been using wterm and it seems to fit the bill for a lightweight and fast
terminal emulator. However, whenever I use MidnightCommander or aptitude, wterm
can't seem to display the fonts properly. There are characters that are not
shown properly and just appear as white boxes. MC and
excuse me for posting too much
as someone said
it was simply
/etc/console-tool/config
that i should have edited
thanx
--- 2g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i thought i got it but
> when i go back with re-boot
> it's gone...
>
> --- 2g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > thanx to those who replyed!
i thought i got it but
when i go back with re-boot
it's gone...
--- 2g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanx to those who replyed!
> don't know why but missed your mail but found out that i got some
> reply
> when searching the www
>
> did a:
> consolechars -f grfixed,psf.gz
> and now my VT looks a
ooking one
--- 2g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> have started going CUI with Debian(stable)
> in Slackware it gave me a chance to choose
> sc.fnt.gz as my VT's font at the insallation process
> i love this font so much so would love to have it in Debian too
>
> does so
On Tue July 3 2007 07:30:08 am Alan Ianson wrote:
> On Tue July 3 2007 05:41:44 am 2g wrote:
> > have started going CUI with Debian(stable)
> > in Slackware it gave me a chance to choose
> > sc.fnt.gz as my VT's font at the insallation process
> > i love this font
On Tue July 3 2007 05:41:44 am 2g wrote:
> have started going CUI with Debian(stable)
> in Slackware it gave me a chance to choose
> sc.fnt.gz as my VT's font at the insallation process
> i love this font so much so would love to have it in Debian too
>
> does somebody
have started going CUI with Debian(stable)
in Slackware it gave me a chance to choose
sc.fnt.gz as my VT's font at the insallation process
i love this font so much so would love to have it in Debian too
does somebody know what this font is called in Debian community?
does simply aptitude i
Everytime I print a PDF file from Kword, the font is jumbled up, and I do not
understand why. I have tried Arial, Times New Roman, and Bitsteam Vera Serif.
What can I do to make these fonts appear correctly?
I have an example of a document pritned from the OpenOffice PDF printer and
the KDE
Hi,
I recently upgraded from oldstable to stable. In particular, I upgraded
to the Iceweasel browser. I seem to be having trouble communicating
font size to the printer. I did not have this problem with oldstable
Firefox.
A page I want to print renders fine on screen but does not obey the
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 21:17 +1000, flebber wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is my first post to the list so if i have done anything untoward
> please let me know.
>
> I am on debian etch using gnome I have been trying to get emacs or
> emacs21 as it seems to be called to work properly.
>
> It is not render
Hi
This is my first post to the list so if i have done anything untoward
please let me know.
I am on debian etch using gnome I have been trying to get emacs or
emacs21 as it seems to be called to work properly.
It is not rendering fonts so words in the buffers are not there they are
merely bloc
Kushal Kumaran escribe:
> I'm lost. Why should text-mode-hook affect what happens when you edit
> perl scripts? Why should you need to frob global-font-lock-mode when
> all you need is to toggle it for just one buffer?
>
You're right, I mistyped, it's perl-mode-hook.
Ismael Valladolid Torres escribe:
> (add-hook 'text-mode-hook
I meant perl-mode-hook
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 5/17/07, Ismael Valladolid Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kushal Kumaran escribe:
> The easy way:
>
> M-x customize-groupfont-lock
>
> See "Font Lock Global Modes" in that customization group. Use it to
> turn off font-lock for perl-mode.
>
> N
Kushal Kumaran escribe:
> The easy way:
>
> M-x customize-groupfont-lock
>
> See "Font Lock Global Modes" in that customization group. Use it to
> turn off font-lock for perl-mode.
>
> Note: I've checked this out in emacs only. Probably is the same w
On 5/16/07, Russell L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How can I disable font-lock-mode in Emacs (actually XEmacs)?
It appears that, upon seeing the first line of a Perl script:
#!/usr/bin/perl
Emacs sets font-lock-mode.
But I do not wish to use font-lock mode when working wit
How can I disable font-lock-mode in Emacs (actually XEmacs)?
It appears that, upon seeing the first line of a Perl script:
#!/usr/bin/perl
Emacs sets font-lock-mode.
But I do not wish to use font-lock mode when working with Perl
scripts. I am editing a number of short Perl scripts, and I
--- Land Haj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Back at work I just upgraded my sarge installation to etch. I changed the
> sources for apt, did apt-get update, apt-get install aptitude and aptitude -f
> --with-recommends dist-upgrade.
>
> All has gone fine, but when I start to work, I discov
Hi!
Back at work I just upgraded my sarge installation to etch. I changed the
sources for apt, did apt-get update, apt-get install aptitude and aptitude -f
--with-recommends dist-upgrade.
All has gone fine, but when I start to work, I discover a problem with my main
tool: kdvi. It can't seem to r
pgraded from Sarge to Etch by following
> > >> the Etch release notes as best I could. The upgrade appeared to work
> > >> very well, but for some font problems. I'm very new to debian and
> > >> linux, so may have made some poor decisions during the upgr
tes as best I could. The upgrade appeared to work
> >> very well, but for some font problems. I'm very new to debian and
> >> linux, so may have made some poor decisions during the upgrade.
> >>
> >> The xfs font server I had running in Sarge now refuses to run
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:39 -0700, Terrence Branscombe wrote:
> Yesterday, I took the leap and upgraded from Sarge to Etch by following
> the Etch release notes as best I could. The upgrade appeared to work
> very well, but for some font problems. I'm very new to debian and
&
Yesterday, I took the leap and upgraded from Sarge to Etch by following
the Etch release notes as best I could. The upgrade appeared to work
very well, but for some font problems. I'm very new to debian and
linux, so may have made some poor decisions during the upgrade.
The xfs font s
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 20:54:12 +0800, Yuwen Dai wrote:
> I want to use the '-font' option of convert to annotate images. I'm not
> sure if convert can deal with locales other than iso-8859, and what's the
> syntax of the font name?
I guess you haven't been
Hi!
I have texlive's packages and I'm trying to use coronet font, but it
isn't easy for me. I did not succeed. I try:
1_$ latex coronet.tex
2_$ dvips coronet.dvi
at 2_$ I get:
mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for cor7j.
...
mktexpk: don't know how to cre
Dear all,
I want to use the '-font' option of convert to annotate images. I'm not
sure if convert can deal with locales other than iso-8859, and what's the
syntax of the font name? Will an X font name like "-
misc-zysong18030-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.19
Rodolfo Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> If I print a pdf document through MS Windows Adobe Reader, I see that
>>> the font is smaller than when I print it under Linux. Can anybody
>>> explain this, and to avoid it?
Nik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
&g
I see that
the font is smaller than when I print it under Linux. Can anybody
explain this, and to avoid it?
Nik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Are you using a font that is available on both systems?
Well, I don't know...
Maybe you could try embedding the font when you create the P
Rodolfo Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If I print a pdf document through MS Windows Adobe Reader, I see that
>> the font is smaller than when I print it under Linux. Can anybody
>> explain this, and to avoid it?
Nik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Rodolfo Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I print a pdf document through MS Windows Adobe Reader, I see that
> the font is smaller than when I print it under Linux. Can anybody
> explain this, and to avoid it?
Are you using a font that
If I print a pdf document through MS Windows Adobe Reader, I see that the font
is smaller than when I print it under Linux.
Can anybody explain this, and to avoid it?
Thanks,
Rodolfo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:20:29PM EST, William Walter wrote:
>Having problem with Etch. I'm a complete newbie to linux. Font rendition
>on
>Gnome is messed up. Some part are lighter than the rest. I've turned on
>subpixel
>smoothing and hinting. Ne
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 20:20 -0500, William Walter wrote:
> Font rendition on Gnome is messed up. Some part are lighter than the
> rest. I've turned on subpixel smoothing and hinting. Neither of them
> have worked. What am i missing in this case?
Make sure your system is complet
Having problem with Etch. I'm a complete newbie to linux. Font rendition on
Gnome is messed up. Some part are lighter than the rest. I've turned on
subpixel
smoothing and hinting. Neither of them have worked. What am i missing in
this
case?
Hi,
I am fighting with Qt3 for years now to correctly display my unicode
characters. Hopefully Qt4 will bring some change to font handling, but while
KDE uses Qt3, I have to stick to the older version. Therefore I have to tell
qtconfig which fonts to substitute with what, if a character isn&#
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:24:08 -0500
"Mike Polyakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This line tells you that fontconfig is simply ignoring the font. It
> > would be interesting to see what would happen if you placed a true
> > type font there.
>
> It works
All I can suggest now is that you copy the font to one of the
system directories listed when you run 'fc-cache -vf' (without a
directory argument). Seems a lot of trouble to go to just to use a font,
doesn't it? Fortunately, defoma does all this work for you in the case
of offic
This line tells you that fontconfig is simply ignoring the font. It
would be interesting to see what would happen if you placed a true type
font there.
It works with true-type version of the same font (from this url:
http://www.proggyfonts.com/index.php?menu=download):
$ ls -l ~/.fonts
-rw-r
6:39 fonts.dir
> -rw-r--r-- 1 mike mike 21024 2007-02-03 15:35 ProggyClean.pcf
> $ fc-cache -vf ~/.fonts
> /home/mike/.fonts: caching, 0 fonts, 0 dirs
This line tells you that fontconfig is simply ignoring the font. It
would be interesting to see what would happen if you placed a true typ
cache directory
/home/mike/.fontconfig: cleaning cache directory
fc-cache: succeeded
$ fc-list | grep -i proggy
$ xlsfonts | grep -i proggy
-windows-proggyclean-medium-r-normal--0-0-96-96-c-0-iso8859-1
-windows-proggyclean-medium-r-normal--13-80-96-96-c-70-iso8859-1
The GVIM's font selector d
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 03:05:42 -0500
"Mike Polyakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is the font seen by fontconfig at all? Check the output of the
> > 'fc-list' command. If the font appears there then it should be
> > available to other applications such
I am trying to install ProggyClean pcf font from
http://www.proggyfonts.com/index.php?menu=download. I've read a couple
of tutorials on how to do this, but still the font does not show up in
the font selection dialog of GVIM.
xlsfonts shows that the font is installed. I can even choose it
I am trying to install ProggyClean pcf font from
http://www.proggyfonts.com/index.php?menu=download. I've read a couple
of tutorials on how to do this, but still the font does not show up in
the font selection dialog of GVIM.
xlsfonts shows that the font is installed. I can even choose it
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:00:19AM +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 00:17:36 -0500
> "Mike Polyakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > >Is this a bitmap font? Fontconfig (the font library used by GTK and
> > >QT
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 00:17:36 -0500
"Mike Polyakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> >Is this a bitmap font? Fontconfig (the font library used by GTK and
> >QT) ignores bitmap fonts by default. To change this, run
> >'dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config
Hi All,
I've had this problem for a while and it would be nice to resolve it
once and for all. I am trying to install ProggyClean pcf font from
http://www.proggyfonts.com/index.php?menu=download. I've read a couple
of tutorials on how to do this, but still the font does not show up i
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 20:46:44 -0500
"Mike Polyakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've had this problem for a while and it would be nice to resolve it
> once and for all. I am trying to install ProggyClean pcf font from
> http://www.proggyfonts.com/
Hi All,
I've had this problem for a while and it would be nice to resolve it
once and for all. I am trying to install ProggyClean pcf font from
http://www.proggyfonts.com/index.php?menu=download. I've read a couple
of tutorials on how to do this, but still the font does not show up i
On 2007-01-30 16:17:19 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> You have to make bitmap fonts available to fontconfig. Run the command
> 'dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config' as root and answer yes to the
> question re. bitmap fonts. Then restart gnome-terminal.
OK, as the Terminus bitmap fonts were avalaible,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:37:42 +0100
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-01-30 12:36:47 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > xterm looks OK:
> >
> > http://otoole.webhop.org/desktop/terminals.png
> >
> > I don't have the others ins
901 - 1000 of 2528 matches
Mail list logo
