RE: ftp, inetd.conf, & potato

2000-02-11 Thread Lewis, James M.
I seem to recall that lots of services were broken out into their own packages. ftpd was one of those. There are at least 3 different ftpd packages. Just pick one and install it. rsh-client, rsh-server and others were in that group also. The list of what got broken out into separate packages

Re: ftp, inetd.conf, & potato

2000-02-11 Thread aphro
on my slink machines it is netstd, not sure about potato. :< nate On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Karl M Yerkes wrote: kmyerk >Sure enough ftp points to /usr/sbin/in.ftpd which does not exist. what kmyerk >package has in.tftpd and in.ftpd ? kmyerk > kmyerk > kmyerk >--karl yerkes kmyerk > kmyerk > kmyerk >

Re: ftp, inetd.conf, & potato

2000-02-11 Thread Karl M Yerkes
Sure enough ftp points to /usr/sbin/in.ftpd which does not exist. what package has in.tftpd and in.ftpd ? --karl yerkes

Re: ftp, inetd.conf, & potato

2000-02-11 Thread aphro
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Karl M Yerkes wrote: kmyerk >This wasn't the case when I was using slink. Whats different? Or what do I kmyerk >not have that I need? make sure that inetd is pointing to a valid binary and that the binary exists for the ftp server. if your using proftpd check /etc/proftpd.c

ftp, inetd.conf, & potato

2000-02-11 Thread Karl M Yerkes
I just upgraded to potato from slink. I noticed that my inetd.conf got modified. In particular, extra comments (like #) were put in front of ftp, netbios-ssn, and netbios-ns. I tryed to turn on ftp service by uncommenting ftp and doing /etc/init.d/inetd reload, but I get this error. mozar