Re: gcc-3.2: what happened to libgcc1, libg2c0, binutils

2004-11-27 Thread David A. Cobb
Alexander Sack wrote: David A. Cobb wrote: On Tuesday 23 November 2004 00:19, David A. Cobb wrote: After five months of struggling ( I had connectivity very briefly before an "upgrade" make my whole installation useless and sent me back to the CD's ), it appears that I need to be able to build

Re: gcc-3.2: what happened to libgcc1, libg2c0, binutils

2004-11-23 Thread Alexander Sack
David A. Cobb wrote: On Tuesday 23 November 2004 00:19, David A. Cobb wrote: After five months of struggling ( I had connectivity very briefly before an "upgrade" make my whole installation useless and sent me back to the CD's ), it appears that I need to be able to build the nVidia kernel-patc

Re: gcc-3.2: what happened to libgcc1, libg2c0, binutils

2004-11-22 Thread David A. Cobb
Rui Silva wrote: why not do apt-get install --reinstall gcc3.2 it would download all the dependecies First reason: this damn nVidia box won't give me internet connectivity from Linux until I can apply the patches. Second reason: if it isn't on the download site, it isn't gonna be downloaded an

Re: gcc-3.2: what happened to libgcc1, libg2c0, binutils

2004-11-22 Thread Rui Silva
why not do apt-get install --reinstall gcc3.2 it would download all the dependecies On Tuesday 23 November 2004 00:19, David A. Cobb wrote: > After five months of struggling ( I had connectivity very briefly before > an "upgrade" make my whole installation useless and sent me back to the > CD's

gcc-3.2: what happened to libgcc1, libg2c0, binutils

2004-11-22 Thread David A. Cobb
After five months of struggling ( I had connectivity very briefly before an "upgrade" make my whole installation useless and sent me back to the CD's ), it appears that I need to be able to build the nVidia kernel-patch with _the_same_version_ of gcc that was used to compile my kernel. I'm us