On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 16:49 +, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:25 PM, PaulNM wrote:
>>> On 12/13/2013 10:03 AM, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 02:25 +0100
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 11:25 -0500, PaulNM wrote:
>>>
>>> The "single" kernel cmdline option would never launch GDM.
>>
>> I believe that was his point, and the reason for the smiley ;).
>> Most would say preventing something from happening is
Hi.
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 19:08:07 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Except that "single" doesn't make GDM fail, it doesn't even launch it.
> > It's not the same thing.
>
> The result is the same, you won't end up with the option to launch
> Iceweasel by a launcher on the GNOME desktop ;). It was jus
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 16:49 +, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:25 PM, PaulNM wrote:
> > On 12/13/2013 10:03 AM, Tom H wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Ralf Mardorf
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 02:25 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:08
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:25 PM, PaulNM wrote:
> On 12/13/2013 10:03 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Ralf Mardorf
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 02:25 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:08 +, Tom H wrote:
>
> The Ubuntu-created grub.cfg
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 11:25 -0500, PaulNM wrote:
> > The "single" kernel cmdline option would never launch GDM.
> >
>
> I believe that was his point, and the reason for the smiley ;).
> Most would say preventing something from happening is a form of
> affecting it.
Correct, that's why I was thin
On 12/13/2013 10:03 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 02:25 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:08 +, Tom H wrote:
The Ubuntu-created grub.cfg cannot be blamed for a GDM problem. If GDM
is bei
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 02:25 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:08 +, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> The Ubuntu-created grub.cfg cannot be blamed for a GDM problem. If GDM
>>> is being launched, grub's job has been done many secon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:08 +, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> The Ubuntu-created grub.cfg cannot be blamed for a GDM problem. If GDM
>> is being launched, grub's job has been done many seconds ago.
>
> This seems to be true here, but you're mistaken,
On 12/10/13, Kailash Kalyani wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 December 2013 07:27 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 02:25 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:08 +, Tom H wrote:
The Ubuntu-created grub.cfg cannot be blamed for a GDM problem. If GDM
is being la
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 17:31 +0530, Kailash Kalyani wrote:
> The solution that worked for me was to run check the
> debian boot partition with gparted (e2fsck -cfkp). While I did not note
> any addition bad sectors, etc. the issue seems to have been resolved.
I didn't think of it, but (somebody e
On Tuesday 10 December 2013 07:27 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 02:25 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:08 +, Tom H wrote:
The Ubuntu-created grub.cfg cannot be blamed for a GDM problem. If GDM
is being launched, grub's job has been done many seconds ago.
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 02:25 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:08 +, Tom H wrote:
> > The Ubuntu-created grub.cfg cannot be blamed for a GDM problem. If GDM
> > is being launched, grub's job has been done many seconds ago.
>
> This seems to be true here, but you're mistaken,
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:08 +, Tom H wrote:
> The Ubuntu-created grub.cfg cannot be blamed for a GDM problem. If GDM
> is being launched, grub's job has been done many seconds ago.
This seems to be true here, but you're mistaken, a boot option could
still cause something when a DE session alre
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Neal Murphy wrote:
>
> Grub 2 is, as far as I know, still broken.
This is the kind of statement that makes me laugh, this case or NM's or...
1) The silent majority of grub2 users have no problems.
2) File a bug report if grub2 (or any other package) fails for you
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Kailash Kalyani wrote:
>
> Here's the boot.cfg (attached).
Since 10_linux has Debian entries, it's Debian that created this
grub.cfg. But it might be that the Ubuntu grub.cfg is the one that's
loaded from the MBR.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 15:15 +0530, Kailash Kalyani wrote:
>>
>> The issue started when I removed old linux images from Ubuntu which is
>> on another partition. That resulted in a grub update from ubuntu and
>> since then I've had this issue.
>
On Monday, December 09, 2013 06:06:24 AM Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 15:15 +0530, Kailash Kalyani wrote:
> > The issue started when I removed old linux images from Ubuntu which is
> > on another partition. That resulted in a grub update from ubuntu and
> > since then I've had this i
On Monday 09 December 2013 08:47 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae' --class debian --class
gnu-linux --class gnu --class os {
load_video
insmod gzio
insmod part_msdos
insmod ext2
set root='(hd1,msdos3)'
menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae' --class debian --class
gnu-linux --class gnu --class os {
load_video
insmod gzio
insmod part_msdos
insmod ext2
set root='(hd1,msdos3)'
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root
ddea8c2f-f4b3-4c3
On Monday 09 December 2013 07:35 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:25 +0530, Kailash Kalyani wrote:
Thanks, I tried that using update-grub2 from my Debian install. That
did not resolve the issue :(
JFTR did you install GRUB by Debian. If not, at least copy
the /boot/grub/grub.cf
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:25 +0530, Kailash Kalyani wrote:
> Thanks, I tried that using update-grub2 from my Debian install. That
> did not resolve the issue :(
JFTR did you install GRUB by Debian. If not, at least copy
the /boot/grub/grub.cfg to the Ubuntu install.
> I think it's a PAM issue with
On Monday 09 December 2013 04:36 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 15:15 +0530, Kailash Kalyani wrote:
The issue started when I removed old linux images from Ubuntu which is
on another partition. That resulted in a grub update from ubuntu and
since then I've had this issue.
So the
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 15:15 +0530, Kailash Kalyani wrote:
> The issue started when I removed old linux images from Ubuntu which is
> on another partition. That resulted in a grub update from ubuntu and
> since then I've had this issue.
So the answer already seems to be there. Ubuntu did likely au
Hi All,
Issue:
This issue started the day before. I log into Debian and instead of a
login screen I get a message about gnome-fallback session failing to
load and an alert asking me to contact the administrator.
The issue started when I removed old linux images from Ubuntu which is
on anothe
25 matches
Mail list logo
