Am 2007-03-27 07:26:20, schrieb Owen Heisler:
> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 11:06 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > Paul Stolp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Perhaps I'm missing the point ... can spam and viruses
> > > be rejected at SMTP time with fetchmail?
> > SMTP? fetchmail is usi
Am 2007-03-24 10:46:15, schrieb Paul E Condon:
> I've been following this thread precisely because I don't know how to
> gain control over the email aspects of my Etch system.
>
> Prior posts in this thread, indicated that getmail could be used as a
> replacement for fetchmail. But, I have come t
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/28/07 10:06, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>> What I don't think is optimal is to redirect *all* your mails
> >>> through an MTA like exim/postfix/... just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/28/07 10:06, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> What I don't think is optimal is to redirect *all* your mails
>>> through an MTA like exim/postfix/... just to do some filtering.
>>> Getmail can do this on its ow
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What I don't think is optimal is to redirect *all* your mails
> > through an MTA like exim/postfix/... just to do some filtering.
> > Getmail can do this on its own just fine (well not the actual
> > filtering, but then neither does exim/postfix), no need
* Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-27 18:45]:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 05:28:47PM -0500, Paul Stolp wrote:
> > [options]
> > verbose=1
> unnecessary, default *is* 1
>
> > readall=1
>
> That should be read_all and the default *is* true
>
Thanks, I'll try removing these lines.
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/07 18:08, Andrei Popescu wrote:
[snip]
> What I don't think is optimal is to redirect *all* your mails through an
> MTA like exim/postfix/... just to do some filtering. Getmail can do
> this on its own just fine (well not the actual filtering,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 05:28:47PM -0500, Paul Stolp wrote:
> [options]
> verbose=1
unnecessary, default *is* 1
> readall=1
That should be read_all and the default *is* true
> delete=1
> message_log=~/.getmail/getmail.log
> [retriever]
> type=SimplePOP3Retriever
> server=.xxx
> username=
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 02:08 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Owen Heisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The point you've been trying to make all through this thread is I
> > think starting to become clear to me (everyone cheer now), because I
> > didn't realize think about mail being scanned for spa
Owen Heisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The point you've been trying to make all through this thread is I
> think starting to become clear to me (everyone cheer now), because I
> didn't realize think about mail being scanned for spam before a full
> message is received. Is it true that in the c
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 18:15 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Owen Heisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 11:06 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > Paul Stolp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I would think that this would then use exim's spam and
> > > > virus checking (I actual
On 2007-03-26 17:49:38 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> Also, I was unconvinced by the reasoning of several posters that
> they use fetchmail and have never been bothered by losing email: If
> I were losing email, how would I know? [...]
If you don't receive anything, this may be an indication. FYI,
Benedict Verheyen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Andrei Popescu schreef:
> > Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> 1.) What is 'reinjection in a mail queue'? Where can I learn how this
> >> differs from whatever is being done by fetchmail as an example case?
> >> Or do
Owen Heisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 11:06 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > Paul Stolp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I would think that this would then use exim's spam and
> > > virus checking (I actually don't have that going
> > > through exim.)
> > >
> > > Perhaps
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 11:06 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Paul Stolp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would think that this would then use exim's spam and
> > virus checking (I actually don't have that going
> > through exim.)
> >
> > Perhaps I'm missing the point ... can spam and viruses
> > be
Paul Stolp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would think that this would then use exim's spam and
> virus checking (I actually don't have that going
> through exim.)
>
> Perhaps I'm missing the point ... can spam and viruses
> be rejected at SMTP time with fetchmail?
SMTP? fetchmail is using POP3 t
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 10:54:11AM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Andrei Popescu schreef:
> > Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> 1.) What is 'reinjection in a mail queue'? Where can I learn how this
> >> differs from whatever is being done by fetchmail as an example case?
> >> O
* Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-26 17:00]:
> Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Andrei Popescu schreef:
> > > Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> 1.) What is 'reinjection in a mail queue'? Where can I learn how
> > >> this differs from whatever is b
Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrei Popescu schreef:
> > Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> 1.) What is 'reinjection in a mail queue'? Where can I learn how
> >> this differs from whatever is being done by fetchmail as an
> >> example case? Or does fetchmail also
Andrei Popescu schreef:
> Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 1.) What is 'reinjection in a mail queue'? Where can I learn how this
>> differs from whatever is being done by fetchmail as an example case?
>> Or does fetchmail also do reinjection in a mail queue?
>
> As I understand it,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/07 14:01, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 1.) What is 'reinjection in a mail queue'? Where can I learn how this
>> differs from whatever is being done by fetchmail as an example case?
>> Or does fetchmai
Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1.) What is 'reinjection in a mail queue'? Where can I learn how this
> differs from whatever is being done by fetchmail as an example case?
> Or does fetchmail also do reinjection in a mail queue?
As I understand it, the pop3/imap protocols were create
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:03:22PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:07:22AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > Owen Heisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > My mail is in ~/.Maildir, accessed by dovecot-imapd, delived
Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:07:22AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > Owen Heisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > My mail is in ~/.Maildir, accessed by dovecot-imapd, delived to by
> > > postfix. How can I configure getmail to deliver mail through
>
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:07:22AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Owen Heisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My mail is in ~/.Maildir, accessed by dovecot-imapd, delived to by
> > postfix. How can I configure getmail to deliver mail through postfix
> > or dovecot? I don't know what fetchmail
Owen Heisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My mail is in ~/.Maildir, accessed by dovecot-imapd, delived to by
> postfix. How can I configure getmail to deliver mail through postfix
> or dovecot? I don't know what fetchmail does, but I don't think it
> delivers directly to ~/.Maildir. Also, I hav
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 09:38 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> I'm not much of an expert, but here's an excerpt from the getmail FAQ:
>
> > Why did you write getmail? Why not just use fetchmail?
> >
> >Short answer: ... well, the short answer is mostly unprintable. The long
> >answer is ... well, lo
27 matches
Mail list logo
