On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:47:15PM -0500, H.S. wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
[..]
> I have these installed (BTW, the usherbrooke site that you said is not
> an official site, it is actually a Debian mirror, listed on Debian
> website):
Oooops, oh ok. Yeah I can see the indic-fonts package:
[
Chris Bannister wrote:
A ps file is just a plain text file.
Well, an image can also be made in to a gs file, which in turn is still
a text file. What I am trying to say is that the fonts which appear
weird to gs are probably being converted to an image in the ps file.
Given what I wrote
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:18:45PM -0500, H.S. wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>>>
How do you generate your .pdf compared with your .ps, or is it a menu
choice, which unfortunately hides all the gory details.
>>> From within OOo from a menu, it exports the odt file directly to PDF.
>>>
>
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 06:19:01PM -0500, H.S. wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:02:23PM -0500, H.S. wrote:
>>> I haven't got any reply to this problem. Either this particular thing
>>> "just works" for everybody and no body knows what could be wrong (so
>>> never lo
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
How do you generate your .pdf compared with your .ps, or is it a menu
choice, which unfortunately hides all the gory details.
From within OOo from a menu, it exports the odt file directly to PDF.
What happens if you generate your .pdf (which seems to include the
font
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 06:19:01PM -0500, H.S. wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:02:23PM -0500, H.S. wrote:
> >So you installed some ttfs, and if you print a .pdf all is ok, but if
> >you print a .ps it isn't?
>
> Yes, that is pretty much it.
> I use the following fon
Chris Bannister wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:02:23PM -0500, H.S. wrote:
I haven't got any reply to this problem. Either this particular thing
"just works" for everybody and no body knows what could be wrong (so
never looked), or the problem is not straight forward at all. So, which
one
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:02:23PM -0500, H.S. wrote:
> I haven't got any reply to this problem. Either this particular thing
> "just works" for everybody and no body knows what could be wrong (so
> never looked), or the problem is not straight forward at all. So, which
> one is it?
So you i
On 2/29/08, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, I am trying to push Linux in a local community center (also trying
> to convince them that the MS Windows they keep on install on all
Go for it!
I just came back from such an event - here in California there was a
rather large, distributed insta
On 2/29/08, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> like a cookiesheet in the oven: crack! It was replaced with the 486 in
> 1994 (in the middle of exams at UofT).
Lucky you. I waited until 1996 (basically until I could afford it and
there was a good special) to get a pentium 100 with 16 me
H.S. wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > Why is it that you need to use TT fonts? Debian has free fonts
> > available as standard packages that "just work".
>
> Somebody is preparing a document (in OOo) which must have those
> fonts. No choice here, I am afraid.
There is ttf2pt1, a TrueType t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/29/08 10:58, H.S. wrote:
[snip]
> BTW, I am trying to push Linux in a local community center (also trying
> to convince them that the MS Windows they keep on install on all
> computers donated to them without Windows is not really legal!). If the
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Why is it that you need to use TT fonts? Debian has free fonts
available as standard packages that "just work".
Doug.
Somebody is preparing a document (in OOo) which must have those fonts.
No choice here, I am afraid.
->HS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:58:47AM -0500, H.S. wrote:
> Thanks. I was beginning to wonder.
>
> I think I faced this problem sometime back as well. Never got it fixed.
> The crux of the matter is: how does Debian (Linux in general?) deal with
> printing a ttf font to PS -- without having to tweak
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:02:23PM -0500, H.S. wrote:
I haven't got any reply to this problem. Either this particular thing
"just works" for everybody and no body knows what could be wrong (so
never looked), or the problem is not straight forward at all. So, which
one
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:09:19PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> For the record, my IBM PS-ValuePoint 100DX4/Tp 6492x5c 486 was purchased
> in 1988 (not 1987) :)
If its for the record, I may as well get it straight (perhaps I am an
old fogey). 1988 was when I got my IBM PS/2 model 70-A21 (3
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:33:19PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/28/08 20:14, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:44:18PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Also, can anybody confirm the above problem does not occur for him?
> >>> Well, I never use OO.o, never use non-latin fon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/08 20:14, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:44:18PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
Also, can anybody confirm the above problem does not occur for him?
>>> Well, I never use OO.o, never use non-latin fonts, never use tt fonts
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:44:18PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> Also, can anybody confirm the above problem does not occur for him?
> >
> > Well, I never use OO.o, never use non-latin fonts, never use tt fonts.
> > I write with LaTex and turn the dvi into whatever I need. I'm I'm
> > printing I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/08 19:17, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:02:23PM -0500, H.S. wrote:
>
>> I haven't got any reply to this problem. Either this particular thing
>> "just works" for everybody and no body knows what could be wrong (so
>>
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:02:23PM -0500, H.S. wrote:
> I haven't got any reply to this problem. Either this particular thing
> "just works" for everybody and no body knows what could be wrong (so
> never looked), or the problem is not straight forward at all. So, which
> one is it?
>
> Also,
H.S. wrote:
H.S. wrote:
H.S. wrote:
Hello
If a document containing some Indic fonts is printed, those fonts
come out to be different on paper. English fonts are okay though.
However, if the document is saved first as a PDF file and then that
PDF printed, all fonts come out okay on the print
H.S. wrote:
H.S. wrote:
Hello
If a document containing some Indic fonts is printed, those fonts come
out to be different on paper. English fonts are okay though. However,
if the document is saved first as a PDF file and then that PDF
printed, all fonts come out okay on the printout. This is
23 matches
Mail list logo
