Its not the processes in themselves which knowledge must be hidden of, but
the parameters to processes. It might contain confidential information like
encrypted bank pins, etc
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 04:35, Dave Sherohman wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 09:52:55PM -0400, Vlad wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 03:08:18PM +0200, Alwyn Schoeman wrote:
Its not the processes in themselves which knowledge must be hidden of, but
the parameters to processes. It might contain confidential information like
encrypted bank pins, etc
any program that requires sensitive information
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 01:37:57PM -0500, Dave Sherohman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:09:43PM +0200, Alwyn Schoeman wrote:
How can I make ps so that it doesn't display all processes for normal users?
ps aux would thus still only show that specific users processes.
Am 29. May, 2001 schwäzte Vlad so:
If you're looking for a way to globally disable the 'a' option, so that
your users aren't allowed to see each other's processes, you'll probably
have to hack the source.
already done. www.openwall.com and download a kernel patch. i would say,
it is the
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 09:52:55PM -0400, Vlad wrote:
already done. www.openwall.com and download a kernel patch. i would say, it
is the FIRST thing security-wise you have
to do after you install any linux distro.
Why would you say that? Do you really consider knowledge of other users'
Hi,
How can I make ps so that it doesn't display all processes for normal users?
ps aux would thus still only show that specific users processes.
Regards,
--
~~
Alwyn Schoeman
Prism Wireless
The Internet will destroy the barriers that are isolating people
from decent
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:09:43PM +0200, Alwyn Schoeman wrote:
How can I make ps so that it doesn't display all processes for normal users?
ps aux would thus still only show that specific users processes.
Ummm... Use `ps ux` instead?
From man ps:
aSelect all processes on a
7 matches
Mail list logo
