Re: graphical file managers (gmc vs. nautilus)

2002-03-04 Thread Angus D Madden
Sam, Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:13:47AM -0800: > Hi, > I saw the screenshot that you mentioned. It's really nice. Can you tell > me how you get borderless windows in gnome? Also, which mail client do > you use and how do you get those colors in vi/vim while writing mail? > Also please point me to som

Re: graphical file managers (gmc vs. nautilus)

2002-03-03 Thread Angus D Madden
Timothy R. Butler, Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 09:32:37PM -0600: > Oops, sorry - here we go: > http://www.uninetsolutions.com/tbutler/linux/ss-1.html . > doeslook nice > > Is there any way in KDE to do a borderless window? The last time I > > tried I couldn't figure out how to do it. I like to pu

Re: graphical file managers (gmc vs. nautilus)

2002-03-03 Thread Timothy R. Butler
Hi Angus, > I'm getting a 404 from your link. Oops, sorry - here we go: http://www.uninetsolutions.com/tbutler/linux/ss-1.html . > Is there any way in KDE to do a borderless window? The last time I > tried I couldn't figure out how to do it. I like to put borderless > windows at a few points

Re: graphical file managers (gmc vs. nautilus)

2002-03-03 Thread Angus D Madden
Timothy R. Butler, Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 06:27:20PM -0600: > > Thanks for the suggestion, though. Maybe it's time to try KDE again. > > You might find it worth while. Really, you could make it look virtually > like unthemed Gnome using the QT-Motif widget style (or most other GTK-looks, > KDE

Re: graphical file managers (gmc vs. nautilus)

2002-03-03 Thread Timothy R. Butler
Howdy, > I tried KDE about six months ago and I went back to gnome because I like > the ability to configure everything to the pixel (enlightenment) and I > couldn't get KDE to display icons (some pixmap problem). Hrm... that's odd. > Thanks for the suggestion, though. Maybe it's time to try

Re: graphical file managers (gmc vs. nautilus)

2002-03-03 Thread Angus D Madden
Timothy R. Butler, Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 01:23:39PM -0600: > > I'm not sure if you are looking for other options, but if you are have you > taken a look at Konqueror? It can handle mounting by itself, can follow > symlinks, has an easy-to-use mime-type editor, provides most of the bells and

Re: graphical file managers (gmc vs. nautilus)

2002-03-03 Thread Angus D Madden
Timo Benk, Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 07:23:11PM +0100: > > My solution in using Mime types with mc is the following > section in /etc/mc.ext: > > -- > ### Default ### > >

Re: graphical file managers (gmc vs. nautilus)

2002-03-03 Thread Timothy R. Butler
On Sunday 03 March 2002 11:56 am, Angus D Madden wrote: > I need to find a good graphical file manager for my family pc. I am > aware of two choices: gmc and nautilus. I'm not sure if you are looking for other options, but if you are have you taken a look at Konqueror? It can handle mounting

Re: graphical file managers (gmc vs. nautilus)

2002-03-03 Thread Timo Benk
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 12:56:04PM -0500, Angus D Madden wrote: > I need to find a good graphical file manager for my family pc. I am > aware of two choices: gmc and nautilus. > > Right now they are using gmc. I like it because it is simple and > straightforward. The only problem is that I have

graphical file managers (gmc vs. nautilus)

2002-03-03 Thread Angus D Madden
I need to find a good graphical file manager for my family pc. I am aware of two choices: gmc and nautilus. Right now they are using gmc. I like it because it is simple and straightforward. The only problem is that I have not been able to associate mime-types with applications. Say, for exampl