On 1/8/2015 3:02 PM, Brian wrote:
>
> If you have resorted to using iptables you have lost it. A standard
> Debian install doesn't need it.
>
>
I disagree. iptables is a great tool for blocking unwanted connections.
What do you have against it?
Jerry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-use
>
> You have completely failed to understand what fail2ban is telling you.
>
> > Anyway, I have decided to get new hardware and do a clean install of
> > everything
> > ... as many of you have suggested ...
>
> It was heading that way so it is probably best for you.
>
You sound like a heartles
*me* < blushing
>
> Why?
>
> If you don't know anyone in China, don't pick up the phone. Why are
> your services responding to them?
>
> You're not seriously telling us you're accepting user name and password
> for ssh authentication from the Internet, are you?
>
Uhm ... yes ... (looking do
> Blocking a country which is famous for producing chocolate and beer.
> What is the world coming to?
rofl :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2015010
So Many??
> For instance here is a list of the blocks for Belgium:
> http://www.nirsoft.net/countryip/be.html
>
> -Joris
>
Feel sorry for iptables
;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
> If you want to inspect further, I would suggest you look at each of the
> jobs being run. See if they are what you expect them to be. Also check
> your /etc/crontab and /etc/anacrontab to see what is in them.
I would love to investigate further but I am afraid I am not inclined towards
forensi
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 10:53:45PM +0200, Danny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> My apologies for replying a little late ...
[cut]
>
> As you can see ... I am already DROPping some of these IP's ... I just need
> something to block an ENTIRE country ...
Install xtables-addons-dkms (which will build the mo
ng, Belgium and Canada ...
You cannot tell something is responding to that user name on your system based
only on that fail2ban alert. On the contrary, the mail means fail2ban
successfully thwarted that particular attempt.
Attackers can't know what names are valid login names unless they can
Am Freitag, 9. Januar 2015, 00:24:06 schrieb Brian:
> On Thu 08 Jan 2015 at 22:36:46 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2015, 14:20:27 schrieb Jerry Stuckle:
> > > Just ensure you're using good security practices - don't allow root
> > > login, use long, random passwords,
On Thu 08 Jan 2015 at 22:36:46 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2015, 14:20:27 schrieb Jerry Stuckle:
>
> > Just ensure you're using good security practices - don't allow root
> > login, use long, random passwords, etc. I also use a random character
> > strings for the
Am Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2015, 14:20:27 schrieb Jerry Stuckle:
> As for the attacks - I've seen a big uptake in the attacks over the last
> couple of weeks. The worst I've seen is > 100 IP's locked out in one 24
> hour period. They are coming from all over the world, although since
> there are a
Am Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2015, 14:20:27 schrieb Jerry Stuckle:
> As for the attacks - I've seen a big uptake in the attacks over the last
> couple of weeks. The worst I've seen is > 100 IP's locked out in one 24
> hour period. They are coming from all over the world, although since
> there are a
On Thu 08 Jan 2015 at 22:53:45 +0200, Danny wrote:
> However, as soon as my network was up and running I got attacked ...
> here is an excerpt of one of the fail2ban mails ...
>
> ###
> The IP 204.12.2
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 02:20:27PM -0500, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> Danny,
>
> If you want to inspect further, I would suggest you look at each of the
> jobs being run. See if they are what you expect them to be. Also check
> your /etc/crontab and /etc/anacrontab to see what is in them.
>
And if y
On Thu 08 Jan 2015 at 11:30:46 -0800, Joris Bolsens wrote:
>
>
> On 01/08/2015 12:53 PM, Danny wrote:
> ###
> >
> > As you can see ... I am already DROPping some of these IP's ... I just need
> > som
On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 22:53:45 +0200
Danny wrote:
>
> As you can see ... I am already DROPping some of these IP's ... I
> just need something to block an ENTIRE country ...
>
Why?
If you don't know anyone in China, don't pick up the phone. Why are
your services responding to them?
You're not s
On 1/8/2015 3:53 PM, Danny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> My apologies for replying a little late ...
>
> It was an absolute struggle getting things to work just so that I can give
> more
> information about the intrusion. I narrowed it down to cron ... What would
> happen is this ... After a boot the ne
On 01/08/2015 12:53 PM, Danny wrote:
###
>
> As you can see ... I am already DROPping some of these IP's ... I just need
> something to block an ENTIRE country ...
>
> Thank you ... and thanks to eve
Hi guys,
My apologies for replying a little late ...
It was an absolute struggle getting things to work just so that I can give more
information about the intrusion. I narrowed it down to cron ... What would
happen is this ... After a boot the network would work fine but would start
degrading at
Some people on this list are treating this far too casually.
2015/01/07 1:06 "Danny" :
>
> Hi guys,
>
> A while ago I posted a question about SFTP (I think the thread name was
"SFTP
> Question") about attacks I got against my server after syslog warned me
about an
> attempted breakin.
Too bad I'v
Brian writes:
> On Tue 06 Jan 2015 at 19:47:09 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>
>> Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 21:51:26 schrieb Danny:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > I am afraid my happiness was short lived. To test if the deletion of the
>> > file (and the effects thereof) would be permanent I rebo
Hello!!
While I am not an expert on the other issues on your machine, I would
recomend a wipe and a clean reinstall. Those root files with the random
characters are what an asian language font typing system rendered into the
standard qwerty would look like (lots of experience). My quick gut instin
On 01/06/2015 11:42 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 20:04:56 schrieb Danny:
Hi guys,
Hi Danny!
A while ago I posted a question about SFTP (I think the thread name was
"SFTP Question") about attacks I got against my server after syslog warned
me about an attempted b
On Tue 06 Jan 2015 at 20:28:04 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 19:20:20 schrieb Brian:
> > On Tue 06 Jan 2015 at 19:47:09 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 21:51:26 schrieb Danny:
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > >
> > > > I am afraid my hap
Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 19:20:20 schrieb Brian:
> On Tue 06 Jan 2015 at 19:47:09 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 21:51:26 schrieb Danny:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > I am afraid my happiness was short lived. To test if the deletion of the
> > > file (and the ef
On Tue 06 Jan 2015 at 20:09:00 +0100, Hans wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 13:33:50 schrieb Jerry Stuckle:
> >
> > One other suggestion I might make is rkhunter (apt-get install
> > rkhunter). While not perfect (what is?), it does scan your system for a
> > number of different compromises.
On Tue 06 Jan 2015 at 19:47:09 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 21:51:26 schrieb Danny:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I am afraid my happiness was short lived. To test if the deletion of the
> > file (and the effects thereof) would be permanent I rebooted the system and
> >
Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 13:33:50 schrieb Jerry Stuckle:
> On 1/6/2015 2:53 PM, Danny wrote:
> >> A stab in the dark, but is it possible this machine has services exposed
> >> to the internet, and you'd not applied fixes against the recent
> >> shellshock bug?>
> > Jip ... ssh, apache, postfix
On 1/6/2015 2:53 PM, Danny wrote:
>> A stab in the dark, but is it possible this machine has services exposed to
>> the internet, and you'd not applied fixes against the recent shellshock bug?
>>
>
> Jip ... ssh, apache, postfix, popa3d ... come to think of it ... all the candy
> is available ...
Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 21:51:26 schrieb Danny:
> Hi guys,
>
> I am afraid my happiness was short lived. To test if the deletion of the
> file (and the effects thereof) would be permanent I rebooted the system and
> consequently found another file (same size, same random lettering) booted
> u
> A stab in the dark, but is it possible this machine has services exposed to
> the internet, and you'd not applied fixes against the recent shellshock bug?
>
Jip ... ssh, apache, postfix, popa3d ... come to think of it ... all the candy
is available ... lol ...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Hi guys,
I am afraid my happiness was short lived. To test if the deletion of the file
(and the effects thereof) would be permanent I rebooted the system and
consequently found another file (same size, same random lettering) booted up
with everything else. :( ... The culprit is well hidden and reg
> From: Simon Brandmair
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Sent: Tuesday, 6 January 2015, 16:53
>Subject: Re: Have I been hacked?
>
>
>On 01/06/2015 09:10 AM, Danny wrote:
>[...]
>> However, prior to this breakin, in early December 2014, I noticed my network
&g
On 01/06/2015 09:10 AM, Danny wrote:
[...]
> However, prior to this breakin, in early December 2014, I noticed my network
> behaving strangely especially through wireless connections.
[...]
I can't give you any input on your specific problem. But here is a
pointer from the Securing Debian Manual (
Le 06.01.2015 19:04, Danny a écrit :
However, I have a few other weird looking files in the /boot
directory. Can you
guys please have a look at them and tell me if they are normal or
not.
#
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Jan 6 19:35 .
drw
Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 20:04:56 schrieb Danny:
> Hi guys,
Hi Danny!
> A while ago I posted a question about SFTP (I think the thread name was
> "SFTP Question") about attacks I got against my server after syslog warned
> me about an attempted breakin.
>
> Consequently I installed fail2ban
Hi guys,
A while ago I posted a question about SFTP (I think the thread name was "SFTP
Question") about attacks I got against my server after syslog warned me about an
attempted breakin.
Consequently I installed fail2ban and did a few other things to let me sleep
better at night.
However, prior
put a "cron job" that rewrites my
> .htaccess from time to time! :)
>
> Anyone else saw this problem?
At the Google forum there's a link it can help you with this:
http://www.mastermindblogger.com/2011/14-ways-to-prevent-your-wordpress-blog-from-being-hacked/
So I g
--- On Thu, 8/23/12, shthead wrote:
> From: shthead
> Subject: Re: Hacked .htaccess redirect to htttp://reltime2012.ru/frunleh?9
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Thursday, August 23, 2012, 1:27 AM
> On 23/08/2012 3:32 AM, Dr Beco
> wrote:
> > One of my sites,
On 23/08/2012 3:32 AM, Dr Beco wrote:
One of my sites, that has joomla (and not wordpress) also got hacked (again).
Is your Joomla along with all components/skins etc. up to date? Many of
the hacked sites I look at are not up to date.
" the sysadmin told me that there was a php s
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Dr Beco wrote:
> For this system I don't have root access. It is managed abroad by a
> "host farm". I already wrote to them to report the (second) problem.
I suggest you take your business elsewhere. You don't want to risk your
name/site/domain being associated with criminals
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:41:59 -0300:
>
> If you have root access, try to use chattr to mark that file as
> immutable (chattr +i).
>
> But really, if they keep changing your .htaccess, it means they have
> compromised the box, and will remain compromising it until you clean
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Dr Beco wrote:
> Does anyone knows how to protect against unauthorized change of .htaccess?
If you have root access, try to use chattr to mark that file as
immutable (chattr +i).
But really, if they keep changing your .htaccess, it means they have
compromised the box, and wil
Dear debianusers,
Does anyone knows how to protect against unauthorized change of .htaccess?
I googled the "htttp://reltime2012.ru/frunleh?9 redirect problem" and
found out that a lot of sites (mainly using wordpress) got hacked and
is redirected to a russian site.
One of my sites
Marc Shapiro gmail.com> writes:
> On 02/06/12 06:56, Camaleón wrote:
> > On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:33:24 -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> >
> >> It looks like my Yahoo mail got hacked. Several e-mails were sent out
> >> earlier today from this account containing on
On 02/06/12 06:56, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:33:24 -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote:
It looks like my Yahoo mail got hacked. Several e-mails were sent out
earlier today from this account containing only a single link as
content. I have no idea what the link goes to, but do not click on
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:33:24 -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> It looks like my Yahoo mail got hacked. Several e-mails were sent out
> earlier today from this account containing only a single link as
> content. I have no idea what the link goes to, but do not click on it.
> Nothing good
Marc Shapiro wrote:
It looks like my Yahoo mail got hacked. Several e-mails were sent out earlier
today from this account containing only a single link as content. I have no
idea what the link goes to, but do not click on it. Nothing good can come of
it. I will be changing my password as
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:39:57 +0200
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sb, 31 dec 11, 10:55:04, Richard wrote:
> > >
> > The upgrade does not leave the installed nvidia 290 intact NAUGHTY !
> > the proprietary Nvidia driver has to be reloaded.
>
> I'm guessing you are not using the Debian packaged nvi
On Sb, 31 dec 11, 10:55:04, Richard wrote:
> >
> The upgrade does not leave the installed nvidia 290 intact NAUGHTY !
> the proprietary Nvidia driver has to be reloaded.
I'm guessing you are not using the Debian packaged nvidia driver,
otherwise you wouldn't get such issues.
More generally, w
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:05:16 +
Richard wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:43:15 +
> Joe wrote:
>
>
> > > I upgraded from sid all of gnome to 3.2.1 , gnome-shell 3.2.1-8
> > > Now it runs in fall back mode only, has anyone else found this ?
> > > I've tried looking in /var/log/gdm3, but it
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:43:15 +
Joe wrote:
> > I upgraded from sid all of gnome to 3.2.1 , gnome-shell 3.2.1-8
> > Now it runs in fall back mode only, has anyone else found this ?
> > I've tried looking in /var/log/gdm3, but its like looking in a
> > haystack for a needle. ideas please
>
> Y
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 15:04:27 +
Richard wrote:
> Hi
> just got blasted by the list politzi for posting on deb-boot.
> I re-enabled sid after a complete reload of wheezy to make sure my
> ex-friend could load without problems all the Ham apps he uses.
> After doing all the work for him , he sa
Richard wrote:
Hi
just got blasted by the list politzi for posting on deb-boot.
You posted to linux.debian.devel.boot on a subject that has nothing to
do with Debian boot development and were told so.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
Hi
just got blasted by the list politzi for posting on deb-boot.
I re-enabled sid after a complete reload of wheezy to make sure my ex-friend
could load without problems all the Ham apps he uses.
After doing all the work for him , he says he's read the debian is no good as
it needs lots of patche
Hi
21.07.2010 14:39, Sergey Spiridonov пишет:
> I found yesterday that some files in /etc/ (/etc/shells and
> /etc/default/default/schroot) are changed. They contain data which I was
> typing on keyboard. Strange enough, this files are not overwritten, but
> contain data they should contain + some
On 04/04/2011 09:13 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/04/2011 05:27 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/04/2011 01:46 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/03/2011 12:19 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
Any expanding civilization engages in Cultural Imperialism. W/o it, we
wouldn't be here using using computers and (whe
On 04/04/2011 05:27 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 01:46 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On 04/03/2011 12:19 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> Any expanding civilization engages in Cultural Imperialism. W/o it, we
>>> wouldn't be here using using computers and (where it's hot) availing
>>> ourselve
On 04/04/2011 01:46 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/03/2011 12:19 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
Any expanding civilization engages in Cultural Imperialism. W/o it, we
wouldn't be here using using computers and (where it's hot) availing
ourselves of air conditioning.
...what's air conditioning? Yeste
On 04/03/2011 12:19 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Any expanding civilization engages in Cultural Imperialism. W/o it, we
> wouldn't be here using using computers and (where it's hot) availing
> ourselves of air conditioning.
...what's air conditioning? Yesterday, it was 42°C and windy, I just
opened
Hello Lisi,
Am 2011-04-01 10:17:42, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> > > 04/01/11 !
> > What does the 4th of January have to do with it??
> Perhaps on an international list we should say the month names as Liam has
> here. Otherwise one is playing guessing games to work out the upbringing o
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:05:50 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 09:42 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> A Spaniard would be vaguely familiar with the concept ;-)
And I'd have to say that *sadly* (IMO, nothing to be proud about)
yes, we do are ;-(
>>> Any expanding civiliza
On 04/04/2011 09:42 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 12:19:24 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/03/2011 07:18 AM, Camaleón wrote:
What part of "Cultural Imperialism" don't you understand???
:)
A Spaniard would be vaguely familiar with the concept ;-)
And I'd have to say that *sadl
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 12:19:24 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/03/2011 07:18 AM, Camaleón wrote:
What part of "Cultural Imperialism" don't you understand???
:)
>>> A Spaniard would be vaguely familiar with the concept ;-)
>>
>> And I'd have to say that *sadly* (IMO, nothi
On 04/03/2011 12:35 PM, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:10, Ron Johnson wrote:
handwriting
What's that?
Something that some American schools still teach to children.
--
"Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure
the liberty and happiness of a people w
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:10, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> handwriting
What's that?
Cheers,
Kelly Clowers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/banlktinfdxr+2w
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 02:06, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity - I've attached a (tiny) screenscrape of how a post
> appears in Thunderbird (yeah I know, but the rest of things are Debian).
> I guess the date format on the left is from the list, and the one on the
> right is from my syst
On 04/03/2011 07:18 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:19:49 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2011-04-02, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/01/2011 07:20 AM, Camaleón wrote:
--- SNIP ---
Here in Spain we celebrate it on December 28th instead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day#Othe
On 04/03/2011 04:24 AM, Heddle Weaver wrote:
[snip]
The logical progression, in the English language and not the American
dialect, is 'day' of the 'month' of the specified 'year'. dd/mm/yy.
This is obvious.
Only obvious if you've grown up that way.
However, "3 Jan 2011" *slightly* reduces con
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:19:49 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2011-04-02, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 04/01/2011 07:20 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> --- SNIP ---
>>> Here in Spain we celebrate it on December 28th instead.
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day#Other_prank_days_in_the_world
>>
On Sunday 03 April 2011 10:06:39 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 03/04/11 16:54, Lisi wrote:
> > On Sunday 03 April 2011 01:20:10 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >> I suspect Liam's response was made in jest :-)
> >
> > I'm sure it was - and a successful jest. But mine was not. In that
> > case, context made
On 3 April 2011 19:06, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 03/04/11 16:54, Lisi wrote:
> > On Sunday 03 April 2011 01:20:10 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >> I suspect Liam's response was made in jest :-)
> >
> > I'm sure it was - and a successful jest. But mine was not. In that
> case,
> > context made the dat
On 03/04/11 16:54, Lisi wrote:
> On Sunday 03 April 2011 01:20:10 Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> I suspect Liam's response was made in jest :-)
>
> I'm sure it was - and a successful jest. But mine was not. In that case,
> context made the date's form redundant, but it _is_ a problem. Not major
>
On Sunday 03 April 2011 01:20:10 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> I suspect Liam's response was made in jest :-)
I'm sure it was - and a successful jest. But mine was not. In that case,
context made the date's form redundant, but it _is_ a problem. Not major
one, a very minor one. But a problem - an
On 02/04/11 23:35, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 02:23:31PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> Why not use the Debian standard??
^ It *was* a question, and I *was* soliciting an answer.
>> Reasoning - it's already been extensively debated *and* voted on, it's a
>> system already
On 04/02/2011 06:31 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In<4d96a8c3.9080...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
I've always thought that Unix Time is *incredibly stupid* (who the heck
says "Fri Apr 1 23:27:41 CDT 2011"?)
and *monumentally shortsighted*
(did nothing happen before 01-Jan-1970?).
What ma
In <4d96a8c3.9080...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
>I've always thought that Unix Time is *incredibly stupid* (who the heck
>says "Fri Apr 1 23:27:41 CDT 2011"?)
>and *monumentally shortsighted*
>(did nothing happen before 01-Jan-1970?).
What makes you say this is UNIX time? The UNIX standard pro
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 02:23:31PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Why not use the Debian standard??
> Reasoning - it's already been extensively debated *and* voted on, it's a
> system already in place, it's the "Debian" way.
>
> (Is there more than one (Debian standard)?)
>
> >From :-
> http://www.
On Saturday 02 April 2011 12:18:03 Simon Hollenbach wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
>
> wrote:
> > It's neither a hack nor a joke. See our announcement at
> > http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110401
>
> In my eyes that's the only thing you cant do on 1st April
On 04/02/2011 12:45 AM, Doug wrote:
On 04/02/2011 12:40 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
I've always thought that Unix Time is *incredibly stupid* (who the
heck says "Fri Apr 1 23:27:41 CDT 2011"?) and *monumentally
shortsighted* (did nothing happen before 01-Jan-1970?).
OpenVMS does it one of the two R
On 04/02/2011 12:18 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 02/04/11 15:40, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/01/2011 11:17 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 02/04/11 14:57, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 20:23, Scott Ferguson
[snip]
Why not use the Debian standard??
day-of-week, dd month hh:mm:ss
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
wrote:
>
> It's neither a hack nor a joke. See our announcement at
> http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110401
>
In my eyes that's the only thing you cant do on 1st April, state that
your prank aint one. Followed up by a "Head of Executive
On 2011-04-02, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/01/2011 07:20 AM, Camaleón wrote:
--- SNIP ---
>> Here in Spain we celebrate it on December 28th instead.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day#Other_prank_days_in_the_world
>>
>
> What part of "Cultural Imperialism" don't you understand???
On 04/02/2011 12:40 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
I've always thought that Unix Time is *incredibly stupid* (who the
heck says "Fri Apr 1 23:27:41 CDT 2011"?) and *monumentally
shortsighted* (did nothing happen before 01-Jan-1970?).
OpenVMS does it one of the two Right Ways of displaying time
(01
On 02/04/11 15:40, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/01/2011 11:17 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 02/04/11 14:57, Kelly Clowers wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 20:23, Scott Ferguson
> [snip]
Why not use the Debian standard??
day-of-week, dd month hh:mm:ss +
>>>
>>> Too verbose,
On 04/01/2011 11:17 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 02/04/11 14:57, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 20:23, Scott Ferguson
[snip]
Why not use the Debian standard??
day-of-week, dd month hh:mm:ss +
Too verbose, not sortable
Cheers,
Kelly Clowers
So...
the RFC standards
On 02/04/11 14:57, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 20:23, Scott Ferguson
> wrote:
>> On 02/04/11 13:50, Kelly Clowers wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 07:12, green wrote:
Aaron Toponce wrote at 2011-04-01 08:11 -0500:
> For international mailing lists, if you stick with IS
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 04:57, Kelly Clowers wrote:
>> Why not use the Debian standard??
>>day-of-week, dd month hh:mm:ss +
ISO format available.
--
Mars 2 Stay!
http://xkcd.com/801/
/etc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 20:23, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
> On 02/04/11 13:50, Kelly Clowers wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 07:12, green wrote:
>>> Aaron Toponce wrote at 2011-04-01 08:11 -0500:
For international mailing lists, if you stick with ISO 8601, there should
be no ambiguity in the
On 02/04/11 13:50, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 07:12, green wrote:
>> Aaron Toponce wrote at 2011-04-01 08:11 -0500:
>>> For international mailing lists, if you stick with ISO 8601, there should
>>> be no ambiguity in the date:
>>>
>>> 2011-04-01 or 20110401 is defined as Apr
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 07:12, green wrote:
> Aaron Toponce wrote at 2011-04-01 08:11 -0500:
>> For international mailing lists, if you stick with ISO 8601, there should
>> be no ambiguity in the date:
>>
>> 2011-04-01 or 20110401 is defined as April 1, 2011, or truncated as
>> 11-04-01 or
On 04/01/2011 08:09 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/01/2011 04:17 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2011 10:05:54 Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2011-04-01, Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:16:37AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site seems hack
Ron Johnson writes:
> What part of "Cultural Imperialism" don't you understand?
Yes. Those northern European can be pretty pushy, can't they? Good to
see that the Spaniards have been able to hold to the old ways. (see the
subject line for a hint).
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
On 04/01/2011 04:17 AM, Lisi wrote:
> On Friday 01 April 2011 10:05:54 Liam O'Toole wrote:
>> On 2011-04-01, Freeman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:16:37AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>>> Hello List,
>>>>
>>>> right n
On 04/01/2011 02:18 PM, Freeman wrote:
[snip]
Well, ISO dates are the best. And *all* the cultures of the world are
magnificent.
No, not *all* of the cultures of the world are magnificent. In fact,
there's pretty hard evidence that some of them really suck. But that's
getting way
On 02/04/11 05:17, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On 20110401_051637, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hello List,
>>
>> right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
>> Distribution.
>>
>> I guess it is a joke.
>
> Apparently not a joke.
>
On 04/01/2011 08:11 AM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 09:01:41PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 01/04/11 20:17, Lisi wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2011 10:05:54 Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2011-04-01, Freeman wrote:
04/01/11 !
What does the 4th of January have to do with it??
On 04/01/2011 07:20 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:17:42 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2011 10:05:54 Liam O'Toole wrote:
I guess it is a joke.
04/01/11 !
What does the 4th of January have to do with it??
Perhaps on an international list we should say the month n
Em 19:59, Nate Bargmann escreveu:
> * On 2011 01 Apr 07:49 -0500, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>> The community distributions have already worked close together and
>> coordinated
>> the solution of common issues, e.g., the top-level "/run" directory, see
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/de
tv.deb...@googlemail.com:
>
> On Sid:
>
> aptitude show cant
>
> Paquet : cant
> État: non installé
> Version : 0.8.15-1
> Priorité : supplémentaire
> Section : admin
> Responsable : Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
This installs the following shell script as /usr/bin/cant:
|#!/bin/bash
|
|args=(${@
201 - 300 of 478 matches
Mail list logo
