On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 02:48:17PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> I assume that for two numbers in the second list to be selected, both
> have to match the two members of an individual tuple. As the tuples
> are ordered, I would assume that they are to be tested in the order
> supplied.
>
> As dicti
On Wed 19 Dec 2018 at 16:53:44 (+), Andy Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:23:59AM +, mick crane wrote:
> > just to be a bit clearer.
> > given a list A of *unique* numbers
> > and a list B of possible pairings find which pairs you can make from the
> > list A.
> > 6 can pair with 1
Andy Smith wrote:
> You saying, "a list B of possible pairings find which pairs you can
> make from the list A" doesn't help when B is actually a hash,
> because hashes have keys and values, so we don't know if you mean to
> "make pairings" with the key or the value, nor is it entirely clear
> wha
Hi Mick,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:23:59AM +, mick crane wrote:
> just to be a bit clearer.
> given a list A of *unique* numbers
> and a list B of possible pairings find which pairs you can make from the
> list A.
> 6 can pair with 100 and 15 can pair with 100 but they cannot both be
> in the
On 2018-12-19 09:12, mick crane wrote:
On 2018-12-19 08:34, deloptes wrote:
mick crane wrote:
yes but there is only one 100, only one key can have it.
I still try to figure out what goes on with the hash pairs
with a longer list of numbers your example seems to pick up on the
values somehow.
I
On 2018-12-19 08:34, deloptes wrote:
mick crane wrote:
yes but there is only one 100, only one key can have it.
I still try to figure out what goes on with the hash pairs
with a longer list of numbers your example seems to pick up on the
values somehow.
I dunno, unless there is something about
mick crane wrote:
> yes but there is only one 100, only one key can have it.
> I still try to figure out what goes on with the hash pairs
> with a longer list of numbers your example seems to pick up on the
> values somehow.
> I dunno, unless there is something about using $_ in a loop being
> unr
On 2018-12-19 07:17, deloptes wrote:
mick crane wrote:
except there is only one 100 in @array it gets me along.
thanks and David too.
but this one 100 satisfies both 6 and 15 so 6 and 15 match.
regards
yes but there is only one 100, only one key can have it.
I still try to figure out what
mick crane wrote:
> except there is only one 100 in @array it gets me along.
> thanks and David too.
but this one 100 satisfies both 6 and 15 so 6 and 15 match.
regards
On 2018-12-19 00:43, deloptes wrote:
deloptes wrote:
if ( @array =~ /$hash[$key]/) {
print "key $key with value " . $hash{$key} .
" is in the array of values\n";
}
I checked and it seems the right answer is
my %hash = ( 1=>8,2=>20,6=>100,15=>100 );
my @array = (1, 21, 100, 8, 15, 22, 6, 12,
On 2018-12-19 00:43, deloptes wrote:
deloptes wrote:
if ( @array =~ /$hash[$key]/) {
print "key $key with value " . $hash{$key} .
" is in the array of values\n";
}
I checked and it seems the right answer is
my %hash = ( 1=>8,2=>20,6=>100,15=>100 );
my @array = (1, 21, 100, 8, 15, 22, 6, 12,
On 12/18/18 5:43 AM, mick crane wrote:
On 2018-12-18 13:34, mick crane wrote:
sorry I put 15 twice there just to confuse the issue
should be
not really on the topic but...
I'm not very good at perl (or anything else ) and could maybe sort it
but perhaps there is an extension that does it.
I h
deloptes wrote:
> if ( @array =~ /$hash[$key]/) {
> print "key $key with value " . $hash{$key} .
> " is in the array of values\n";
> }
I checked and it seems the right answer is
my %hash = ( 1=>8,2=>20,6=>100,15=>100 );
my @array = (1, 21, 100, 8, 15, 22, 6, 12, 56);
foreach my $key (keys %hash
Hi,
it is not exactly clear if you want to test the key or the value of the
pairs, but I assume you are after the values.
mick crane wrote:
> I have an list of pairs
> (1=>8,2=>20,6=>100,15=>100)
this would be a hash array (means key/value pairs)
> and an array of unique numbers
> (1 21 10
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:34:53PM +, mick crane wrote:
> I'm not very good at perl (or anything else ) and could maybe sort it but
> perhaps there is an extension that does it.
> I have an list of pairs
> (1=>8,2=>20,6=>100,15=>100)
> and an array of unique numbers
> (1 21 100 8 15 22 6 12
On 2018-12-18 13:34, mick crane wrote:
sorry I put 15 twice there just to confuse the issue
should be
not really on the topic but...
I'm not very good at perl (or anything else ) and could maybe sort it
but perhaps there is an extension that does it.
I have an list of pairs
(1=>8,2=>20,6=>100,
not really on the topic but...
I'm not very good at perl (or anything else ) and could maybe sort it
but perhaps there is an extension that does it.
I have an list of pairs
(1=>8,2=>20,6=>100,15=>100)
and an array of unique numbers
(1 21 100 8 15 22 6 12 15 )
I want to see what pairs can
17 matches
Mail list logo