On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 09:19:08AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 30.11.06 17:00, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > This is only true if you use IDE and also put the mirrored pair on the
> > same channel (which would be incredibly foolish). Under every other
> > conceivable scenario, th
On Thursday, 30.11.2006 at 22:53 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > On 30.11.06 15:44, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> > > > What is debian's opinion about hardware/software raid?
>
> > On Thursday, 30.11.2006 at 16:56 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > it highly depends on the hardw
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:53:26PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >
> > I did not want to mention this, because:
> >
> > - software RAID-1 has bus overhead (the same data have to be transferred
> > multiple times to multiple drives, so writing may be twice as slow)
On 30.11.06 17:00,
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:53:26PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> I did not want to mention this, because:
>
> - software RAID-1 has bus overhead (the same data have to be transferred
> multiple times to multiple drives, so writing may be twice as slow)
>
This is only true if you use I
> Dave Ewart wrote:
> > Although it's worth pointing out that software RAID-*1* (one of the
> > options under consideration) has almost no CPU overhead, and is often a
> > good low-cost option.
> >
> > Part of your decision must rest on what exactly the machine will be
> > doing. Different RAID s
> > On 30.11.06 15:44, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> > > What is debian's opinion about hardware/software raid?
> On Thursday, 30.11.2006 at 16:56 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > it highly depends on the hardware raid. The true hardware RAID with
> > hotspare, hotswap etc. support and with
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 17:20 +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> My concern is that we are going to have only one server. So if there was
> a hardware problem, with software raid I could just temporarily move the
> disks to an ordinary workstation and serve the data from there. With
> hardware raid,
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:44:38 +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote
> Preparing to buy a new server...
>
> What is debian's opinion about hardware/software raid?
>
> I have the feeling that software raid 1 is more reliable since if
> anything goes wrong with the hardware, I could just take one or two
>
Dave Ewart wrote:
> Although it's worth pointing out that software RAID-*1* (one of the
> options under consideration) has almost no CPU overhead, and is often a
> good low-cost option.
>
> Part of your decision must rest on what exactly the machine will be
> doing. Different RAID setups are best
On Thursday, 30.11.2006 at 16:56 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 30.11.06 15:44, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> > Preparing to buy a new server...
> >
> > What is debian's opinion about hardware/software raid?
> >
> > I have the feeling that software raid 1 is more reliable since if
> >
On 30.11.06 15:44, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Preparing to buy a new server...
>
> What is debian's opinion about hardware/software raid?
>
> I have the feeling that software raid 1 is more reliable since if
> anything goes wrong with the hardware, I could just take one or two
> disks out of th
Preparing to buy a new server...
What is debian's opinion about hardware/software raid?
I have the feeling that software raid 1 is more reliable since if
anything goes wrong with the hardware, I could just take one or two
disks out of the server and put them into a workstation to get up and
runni
12 matches
Mail list logo
