On 08/07/11 22:55, lee wrote:
David Jardine da...@jardine.de writes:
I have version 275.09.07 in wheezy running fine - although I think I
did have to remove some mesa-related packages that broke things on an
update a few days ago.
You mean libgl1-mesa-glx? There are 1716 packages
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Mahesh T Pai paiva...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have nvidia GeForce 7300GT video card.
I did not find xorg.conf in /etc/X11
But when it starts gui, I get first hazy stripes. Further I get
panels half black.
Any solutions?
1.
Before you downgrade, try
On Sb, 09 iul 11, 10:30:23, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I didn't run into dependency hell, anything else is from testing.
I really wonder hat people claim to get issues regarding to
dependencies, when downgrading X.
We're still almost one year away from the freeze, I'm guessing many
changes are
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 12:35 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 09 iul 11, 10:30:23, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I didn't run into dependency hell, anything else is from testing.
I really wonder hat people claim to get issues regarding to
dependencies, when downgrading X.
We're still almost
David Jardine da...@jardine.de writes:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:55:00PM +0200, lee wrote:
David Jardine da...@jardine.de writes:
I have version 275.09.07 in wheezy running fine - although I think I
did have to remove some mesa-related packages that broke things on an
update a few
bri...@aracnet.com writes:
it's the strangest thing though, Xorg -configure still fails.
It simply generates the xorg.conf which is practically useless and
un-used (on your and my systems); so why bother??
--
Mahesh T. Pai ||
Encryption: A powerful algorithmic encoding
I am also having nvidia card. Should I delete xorg.conf for good
performance. I am having discoloured task bar.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:28 AM, bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 00:42:57 -0400
William Hopkins we.hopk...@gmail.com wrote:
First problem I found - still had an nvidia
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:26:15 +0530, L V Gandhi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:28 AM, bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 00:42:57 -0400
William Hopkins we.hopk...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
Have you tried running it without a config file? Why are you running
X as
root?
I
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:39:26 +0530
Mahesh T Pai paiva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Mahesh,
It simply generates the xorg.conf which is practically useless and
un-used (on your and my systems); so why bother??
Isn't a basic one required to run the nvidia driver rather than nouveau?
--
Regards
On 2011-07-08 11:15 +0200, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:39:26 +0530
Mahesh T Pai paiva...@gmail.com wrote:
It simply generates the xorg.conf which is practically useless and
un-used (on your and my systems); so why bother??
Isn't a basic one required to run the nvidia driver
On Friday 08 July 2011 12:38:23 am bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
howdy,
got a new motherboard and I'm trying to figure out how to get
reasonable X working. using vesa and something very low resolution
right now.
I tried googling on that error symbol and literally got nothing
back.
Hi,
What
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:34:19 +0200
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello Sven,
True, but you don't need configuration programs to create one. The
following four lines will do:
Well, yes. Of course, you don't actually *need* a config tool to create
extremely complex configs. It just
Brad Rogers b...@fineby.me.uk writes:
Isn't a basic one required to run the nvidia driver rather than nouveau?
If I got the message to which I was responding right, the problem was
solved by removing xorg.conf. I was responding to (what seemed to me) an
aside comment about the configuration
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 10:04:08 -0400
mark m...@neidorff.com wrote:
On Friday 08 July 2011 12:38:23 am bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
howdy,
got a new motherboard and I'm trying to figure out how to get
reasonable X working. using vesa and something very low resolution
right now.
I tried
On 07/07/11 at 09:58pm, bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 00:42:57 -0400
William Hopkins we.hopk...@gmail.com wrote:
First problem I found - still had an nvidia modules installed, and didn't
realize it. so I purged nvidia* and rebooted.
I saw it reported you were using an
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 20:14:12 +0530
Mahesh T Pai paiva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Mahesh,
If I got the message to which I was responding right, the problem was
solved by removing xorg.conf. I was responding to (what seemed to me)
That's right, but the OP would ultimately prefer to use the
Forwarded Message
From: Brad Rogers
Subject: Re: help ! nvidia driver and X
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:39:47 +0100
As did I recently; nVidia is b0rked in testing, ATM. :-(
No it isn't, here 173.14.30-1 is ok with kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64 from the
repositories and a self
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 19:44:26 +0200
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
Hello Ralf,
No it isn't, here 173.14.30-1 is ok with kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64 from the
Okay, I'll qualify my statement; 275.* nvidia drivers are currently
broken in testing.
repositories and a self build 2.6.39
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 19:44 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Forwarded Message
From: Brad Rogers
Subject: Re: help ! nvidia driver and X
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:39:47 +0100
As did I recently; nVidia is b0rked in testing, ATM. :-(
No it isn't, here 173.14.30-1
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:13:39PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 19:44:26 +0200
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
Hello Ralf,
No it isn't, here 173.14.30-1 is ok with kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64 from the
Okay, I'll qualify my statement; 275.* nvidia drivers are
David Jardine da...@jardine.de writes:
I have version 275.09.07 in wheezy running fine - although I think I
did have to remove some mesa-related packages that broke things on an
update a few days ago.
You mean libgl1-mesa-glx? There are 1716 packages depending on that,
and I have too many
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:55:00PM +0200, lee wrote:
David Jardine da...@jardine.de writes:
I have version 275.09.07 in wheezy running fine - although I think I
did have to remove some mesa-related packages that broke things on an
update a few days ago.
You mean libgl1-mesa-glx?
Forwarded Message
From: David Jardine da...@jardine.de
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: help ! nvidia driver and X
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 00:03:11 +0200
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:55:00PM +0200, lee wrote:
David Jardine da...@jardine.de writes
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Mahesh T Pai paiva...@gmail.com wrote:
Brad Rogers b...@fineby.me.uk writes:
Isn't a basic one required to run the nvidia driver rather than nouveau?
If I got the message to which I was responding right, the problem was
solved by removing xorg.conf. I was
howdy,
got a new motherboard and I'm trying to figure out how to get reasonable X
working.
using vesa and something very low resolution right now.
I tried googling on that error symbol and literally got nothing back.
Here's the lspci entry:
03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia
On 07/07/11 at 09:38pm, bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
howdy,
got a new motherboard and I'm trying to figure out how to get reasonable X
working.
using vesa and something very low resolution right now.
I tried googling on that error symbol and literally got nothing back.
Here's the lspci
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 00:42:57 -0400
William Hopkins we.hopk...@gmail.com wrote:
First problem I found - still had an nvidia modules installed, and didn't
realize it. so I purged nvidia* and rebooted.
Have you tried running it without a config file? Why are you running X as
root?
I was
27 matches
Mail list logo
