If the file "/etc/inetd.conf" contains only comment or empty lines, with
the package "openbsd-inetd" installed inetd is not started at boot-up.
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11.09.06 19:51, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> But I wonder why netbase depends on inetd.
because many packages depending on netbase depends on it because of inetd
(inetd was some time ago in netbase). See:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=154441;archive=yes
However they imho should
Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PS: Funnily enough `apt-get remove openbsd-inetd' says that a whole bunch of
> packages depend on it:
> Looks like bugs in the dependencies in `testing'.
I don't think they depend directly on inetd. It seems netbase depends
on openbsd-inetd, and a whol
Please look at
#385320: Users of xinetd can't remove openbsd-inetd
Bye,
Stefan Monnier wrote:
I would say that the choice between the two is defined not by how
'professional' your host is, but rather by the hostility of the
networking environment. Xinetd can limit the number of connections an
> I would say that the choice between the two is defined not by how
> 'professional' your host is, but rather by the hostility of the
> networking environment. Xinetd can limit the number of connections and
> running processes, preventing some DoS attacks. Xinetd also has a more
> extensive logging
On 9/8/06, Ismael Valladolid Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
inetd is more than ok for a personal environment, why not also for a
professional setup. xinetd is far more featured, though, and it's been
the default for Red Hat systems for years.
I would say that the choice between the two is d
T escribe:
> On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:12:48 +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
>
> >> ...I'd like to know whether
> >> inetd or xinetd is preferred for a *personal environment*.
> >
> > inetd is more than ok for a personal environment, why not also f
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:12:48 +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
>> ...I'd like to know whether
>> inetd or xinetd is preferred for a *personal environment*.
>
> inetd is more than ok for a personal environment, why not also for a
> professional setup.
Thanks Ism
> > On Thursday 07 September 2006 03:56, T wrote:
> > > Hope I'm not starting a religious war here, but I'd like to know
> > > whether inetd or xinetd is preferred for a *personal environment*.
I prefer xinetd anywhere. IT's better configurable, even if so
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 23:58:49 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 07 September 2006 03:56, T wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Hope I'm not starting a religious war here, but I'd like to know
> > whether inetd or xinetd is preferred for a
T escribe:
> Hope I'm not starting a religious war here, but I'd like to know whether
> inetd or xinetd is preferred for a *personal environment*.
inetd is more than ok for a personal environment, why not also for a
professional setup. xinetd is far more featured, though, a
On Thursday 07 September 2006 03:56, T wrote:
> Hi
>
> Hope I'm not starting a religious war here, but I'd like to know whether
> inetd or xinetd is preferred for a *personal environment*.
I like openbsd-inetd because it's straightforward, lightweight and got the
O
T:
>
> # /etc/init.d/inetd has been diverted by the xinetd package.
> # The inetd service is provided by xinetd, which means inetd
> # doesn't need to be run.
> #
> # See /etc/init.d/xinetd, or /etc/init.d/inetd.real.
>
> exit 0
>
>
> Does it imply xinetd is more
Hi
Hope I'm not starting a religious war here, but I'd like to know whether
inetd or xinetd is preferred for a *personal environment*.
In my current system:
$ cat /etc/init.d/inetd
#!/bin/sh
# /etc/init.d/inetd has been diverted by the xinetd pack
14 matches
Mail list logo
