this is a bug
in linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7.
The problem is, IP masquerading doesn't work when booting the
etchnhalf kernel. Is there any way to fix this? Attached is my dmesg
and iptables rules, if that information is required.
Thanks!
Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
Linux version 2.6.24-etchnhalf
Para acortar sólo pongo parte del mensaje:
Using binary mode to transfer files.
ftp ls
500 Illegal PORT Command
ftp: bind: Address already in use (SOLUCIÓN)
ftp ls
500 Illegal PORT Comman
ftp
Yo tenía el mismo problema. La verdad es que no entiendo del todo la
configuración a bajo
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ethx -j SNAT --to
ppp_address
this is the wrong approach for a dialup where you would get a dynamic
ip. use masquerading instead. (this will always work regardless of your
external ip assigned from the ISP)
do the following commands:
# iptables -t nat -A
--- Matt Zagrabelny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ethx -j SNAT
--to
ppp_address
this is the wrong approach for a dialup where you
would get a dynamic
ip. use masquerading instead. (this will always work
regardless of your
external ip assigned from the
Many thanks for all these replies. I've now got it working now so that
another Debian box and a Mac can both connect through the Debian gateway.
The thing I was doing wrong was in setting the gateway on the other network
machines. Like not doing it on the Debian one [doh!] and mixing up
I wonder if someone could help please!
I've upgraded to sarge, and built a new kernel with lots of the networking
options built in.
I've tried to set up IP masquerading so I can use my Debian PC as a router
to a [dialup] ISP. The Debian machine has a serial modem and an ethernet
card
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 1:09 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once connected to the ISP, the Debian machine can ping the IP address
of its modem and get a response, and canload web pages. But other
machines get nothing when I try.
Did you install the ipmasq package as well?
--
Paul
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if someone could help please!
I've upgraded to sarge, and built a new kernel with
lots of the networking
options built in.
I've tried to set up IP masquerading so I can use my
Debian PC as a router
to a [dialup] ISP. The Debian machine has
with
lots of the networking
options built in.
I've tried to set up IP masquerading so I can use my
Debian PC as a router
to a [dialup] ISP. The Debian machine has a serial
modem and an ethernet
card. The ethernet connects OK to the other
computers [Macs and Windows] -
you can ping
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:04:16 -0800, Daniel Asarnow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the advice. It looks like I'll be at this for a while...if
I can't make any headway with it, I'll ask for more help
Thanks again,
As a basis for your rules I recommend
Your firewall rules look, uh, ugly, meaning, not meant for human eyes.
You should try to isolate your problem from bottom to top:
Try a minimalistic firewall. Just for testing, of course, as this is
totally insecure:
# Clear all rules
/sbin/iptables -F; /sbin/iptables -t nat -F;
Thanks for the advice. It looks like I'll be at this for a while...if
I can't make any headway with it, I'll ask for more help
Thanks again,
da
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 03:11:38 -0600, Yusuf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your firewall rules look, uh, ugly, meaning, not meant for human eyes.
You
Here's the output of iptables -L -v -t nat:
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 1 packets, 60 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, 11.11.2004 at 07:57 +, Alan Chandler wrote:
On Thursday 11 November 2004 03:03, Daniel Asarnow wrote:
The complete output of iptables -L is here: www.boxbattle.com/iptables.txt
A bit long...
I don't know what its doing
Hey all,
I have set up my debian box as a firewall/router for my home network
(using firehol to actually make the firewall). Everything seems to be
working just fine, except that the computers behind the firewall box
can only access some websites. They can perform succesful DNS lookups
on any
On Thursday 11 November 2004 03:03, Daniel Asarnow wrote:
The complete output of iptables -L is here: www.boxbattle.com/iptables.txt
A bit long...
I don't know what its doing either - some things to check:-
- There is a long list of IP networks which its doing something with
(accepting or
Hallo,
ich habe IP_Masquerading auf meinem Linux-Rechner
installiert. Dabei bin ich Schritt für Schritt dem
offiziellen HowTo
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/index.html
gefolgt.
Das Dokument schlägt vor, als Skript folgendes beim Booten zu
starten:
am 11.06.2004, um 14:40:25 +0200 mailte Christian Christmann folgendes:
Hat jemand eine Idee, warum diese Meldung erscheint?
Ja, die FAQ. Lies bitte meine Antwort in dcsf
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer(Kontakt: siehe Header)
Tel. NL Heynitz: 035242/47212
GnuPG-ID
Am Sat, 06 Mar 2004 17:30:33 +0100 von
linux has questions [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Du bist jetzt auch schon ein paar Tage auf der Liste,
hast du noch nicht gelesen, dass hier vernünftige Realnamen gewünscht
sind?
--
Gruss
Holger
==
Hi Leute!
Hab folgendes Problem:
Auf meinem Rechner habe ich debian drauf und eine Internetverbindung hat
der rechner ebenfalls. da ich noch andere rechner so rumstehen habe
(auch win-pcs) will ich dennen auch internet gönnen.
also hab ich mal ip-masquerading aktiviert: mit ein paar wenig
Jean-Michel OLTRA wrote:
les machines du réseau ont une passerelle dans /etc/interfaces ?
Les machines du réseau sont sous win98 avec les paramètres suivants :
les DNS sont ceux du FAI (les mêmes que dans /etc/resolv.conf de la
passerelle),
l'hôte c'est le nom de l'ordinateur (le même
Le mardi 28 octobre 2003, Marco Ricco a écrit...
bonjour,
Les machines du réseau sont sous win98 avec les paramètres suivants :
Je crains de ne t'être d'un grand secours, c'est tout juste si je sais
démarrer ce machin.
les DNS sont ceux du FAI (les mêmes que dans /etc/resolv.conf de
Le dimanche 26 octobre 2003, Marco Ricco a écrit...
bonjour,
# L'interface eth0 connectée au réseau local (IP privée fixe)
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.0.1
netmask 255.255.255.0
broadcast 192.168.0.255
Jean-Michel OLTRA wrote:
# Activation de la fonction de forwarding IP au niveau du
noyau
up echo 1 | /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
Bof, le mettre dans /etc/network/options, peut-être, à la debian ?
J'ai constaté que j'avais dans /etc/network/options
Le lundi 27 octobre 2003, Marco Ricco a écrit...
bonjour,
J'ai constaté que j'avais dans /etc/network/options ip_forward=no.
J'ai commenté ip_forward=no puis ajouté up echo 1 ...
Aucune amélioration.
Ensuite je commente up echo et ajouté ip_forward=yes
Toujours rien.
Au temps pour
Bonjour,
J'essaie de faire de l'IP masquerading sur une passerelle woody 2.4.22.
J'ai suivi la formation d'Alexis de Lattre à propos du firewalling (et
de la compilation du noyau).
J'ai bien activé l'IP forwarding dans [/etc/network/interfaces] :
up echo 1 | /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
Le dimanche 26 octobre 2003, Marco Ricco a écrit...
bonjour,
Il semble qu'avec Netfilter il n'y ait rien à ajouter ?
??
Tu as mis la règle qui active le masquerading ?
Tu as des règles pour le forwarding ?
La connexion est activée sur la passerelle ? Tu peux joindre quelque
chose de la
Jean-Michel OLTRA wrote:
Il semble qu'avec Netfilter il n'y ait rien à ajouter ?
Tu as mis la règle qui active le masquerading ?
J'ai ceci dans /etc/network/interfaces :
(d'après la formation d'Alexis de Lattre)
# L'interface loopback
auto lo
iface lo
Hallo Liste,
ich habe ein -- für mich nicht nachvollziehbares -- Problem.
Ich habe ip-masquerading nach HOWTO eingerichtet und es funktioniert
auch prinzipiell. Beim Hochfahren des Servers wird das firewall-Skript
eingeschaltet, keine Fehlermeldungen. Versuche ich jetzt vom Client eine
ip
Hallo,
* On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:59:50AM +0200, Matthias Weinhold wrote:
ich habe ein -- für mich nicht nachvollziehbares -- Problem.
Ahhssoo, deswegen die fehlenden Fehlermeldungen *fg*
Ich habe ip-masquerading nach HOWTO eingerichtet und es funktioniert
auch prinzipiell.
Mit einem
*
Ich habe ip-masquerading nach HOWTO eingerichtet und es funktioniert
auch prinzipiell.
Mit einem eigenen script?? Oder was genau?
Was hast du gemacht?
Was meinst du? Ich habe ip-masquerading nach dem HOWTO eingerichtet,
steht doch schon in der ersten Mail.
Beim Hochfahren des Servers
-aliasing.
Bien, despues de documentarme, he leido por algún lado que no es muy
conveniente, concretamente en el ip-masquerading howto:
[Ip-masquerade howto]
( IP Aliasing ) - Can IP Masquerade work with only ONE Ethernet
network card?
Yes and no. With the IP Alias kernel feature, users can
algún lado que no es muy
conveniente, concretamente en el ip-masquerading howto:
[Ip-masquerade howto]
( IP Aliasing ) - Can IP Masquerade work with only ONE Ethernet
network card?
Yes and no. With the IP Alias kernel feature, users can setup multiple
aliased interfaces such as eth0:1
reglas del cortafuegos, de
hecho le voy a echar un vistazo detenidamente a ver si me voy aclarando
un poco, que estoy muy verde en este asunto.
Pero, la principal pregunta es si ¿es o no posible utilizar ip-aliasing
con ip-masquerading? La respuesta negativa no dejaria mas opcion que
comprar una
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:16:55AM -0400, Jim Hribar wrote:
Installed ipmasq (apt-get install ipmasq) and it does not seem to be
working. The error message that puzzles me is:
Initializing IP Masquerading...IP Masquerade has not been enabled in the
kernel.
done.
Loading IP Masquerade
Hej,
Jag har lite problem med när jag håller på med att följa instruktionerna till
IP-Masquerading-HowtTo. Det är när jag är klar med att kompilera kärnan
(2.4.19) skall man skriva in i /etc/rc.d/rc.local: etc/rc.d/rc.firewall. Och
den existerar som sagt inte i Debian. Jag hystade
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:23:50PM +0200, Benny Jensen wrote:
1. Jag har lagt rc.firewall i /etc/rc.boot. Fungerar det?
Filer med punkter i filnamnet ignoreras.
2. Den vill ha en fil i /etc/init.d/functions?. Var finns den egentligen?
På RedHat system?
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at
Thank to all who help me with my IP Addresses problem
Now I have successfuly configured an IP Masquerading linux gateway, of
course with the 192.168.0.1 IP. I know its working correctly because I
have a windows machine as client getting the Internet from this linux
gateway.
But I dont know what
On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 20:59, Romel Sandoval wrote:
Thank to all who help me with my IP Addresses problem
Now I have successfuly configured an IP Masquerading linux gateway, of
course with the 192.168.0.1 IP. I know its working correctly because I
have a windows machine as client getting
-
From: Vineet Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: martes, 04 de junio de 2002 2:26
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: rc.local in debian (was: Ip Masquerading)
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020603 16:51]:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:49:54PM +0200, Ronald Castillo wrote:
I
-
From: Vineet Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: martes, 04 de junio de 2002 2:26
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: rc.local in debian (was: Ip Masquerading)
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020603 16:51]:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:49:54PM +0200, Ronald Castillo wrote:
I
Ronald Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just to update something new I have found out.. I tried pinging my ADSL
router and my brother´s PC from my Linux box and it doesn't work either,
but it did work from my Windows PC when I had it connected directly to
my ADSL router. So, now I'm feeling
1:50 AM
Subject: Re: rc.local in debian (was: Ip Masquerading)
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:49:54PM +0200, Ronald Castillo wrote:
I was thinking that I should configure my secondary LAN card (the one
that connects to my internal network) in the /etc/network/interfaces
card, but I don't know
2:26 AM
Subject: Re: rc.local in debian (was: Ip Masquerading)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello.
Thanks to you all for your suggestions for trying to connect my Linux
box to my Windows one via serial port, but after trying some things and
not being able to make it work I decided to try to do that via network
cards.
On the IP Masquerading HOWTO it says I have to edit my
/etc/rc.d
:
Hello.
Thanks to you all for your suggestions for trying to connect my Linux
box to my Windows one via serial port, but after trying some things and
not being able to make it work I decided to try to do that via network
cards.
On the IP Masquerading HOWTO it says I have to edit my
/etc
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:08:56AM -0500, Elizabeth Barham wrote:
I made my own entitled local in /etc/init.d by copying
/etc/init.d/skeleton to /etc/init.d/local, added what I needed it to
do in the start section, and created a softlink to it in rc2.d
entitled S99local.
I don't know how
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:08:56AM -0500, Elizabeth Barham wrote:
I made my own entitled local in /etc/init.d by copying
/etc/init.d/skeleton to /etc/init.d/local, added what I needed it to
do in the start section, and created a softlink to it in rc2.d
entitled S99local.
I don't know how
appreciate any help about this.
Thanks a lot for helping me so far..
Ronald Castillo
-Original Message-
From: Colin Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin
Watson
Sent: lunes, 03 de junio de 2002 13:16
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: rc.local in debian (was: Ip
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:49:54PM +0200, Ronald Castillo wrote:
I was thinking that I should configure my secondary LAN card (the one
that connects to my internal network) in the /etc/network/interfaces
card, but I don't know what to place there. I have already configured
the LAN card that
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020603 16:51]:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:49:54PM +0200, Ronald Castillo wrote:
I was thinking that I should configure my secondary LAN card (the one
that connects to my internal network) in the /etc/network/interfaces
card, but I don't know what to place
* Johannes Athmer wrote:
Initializing IP Masquerade... IP Masquerade has noch been enabled in the kernel.
Loading IP Masquerade kernel module... done
Mich wundert etwas das die Module geladen werden koennen aber im
Kernel kein Masuqerading Support aktiviert ist. Die Module werden
automatisch
* Markus Hubig wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Johannes Athmer wrote:
Initializing IP Masquerade... IP Masquerade has noch been enabled in the kernel.
Kann es sein das Du ipmasq oder ein aehnliches Packet installiert
hast? Das wuerde die erste Meldung erklaeren:
Fuer Masquerading braucht man
Hi Norbert!
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Markus Hubig wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Johannes Athmer wrote:
Initializing IP Masquerade... IP Masquerade has noch been enabled in the kernel.
Kann es sein das Du ipmasq oder ein aehnliches Packet installiert
hast? Das wuerde
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010807 10:35]:
What is a good program for Windows 98 that will allow me to set up IP
Masquerading to share my internet connection with some Linux boxes?
The Right Way to do this is to make one of the Linux machines do the
masquerade. A windows 98
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Vineet Kumar wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010807 10:35]:
What is a good program for Windows 98 that will allow me to set up IP
Masquerading to share my internet connection with some Linux boxes?
The Right Way to do this is to make one of the Linux
What is a good program for Windows 98 that will allow me to set up IP
Masquerading to share my internet connection with some Linux boxes?
-- Deven
IP
Masquerading to share my internet connection with some Linux boxes?
-- Deven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Patrick No sig in my .sig Kirk
GSM: +44 7876 560 646
ICQ: 42219699
On Saturday 23 June 2001 00:35, you wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:56:52PM +0200, Brendon wrote:
Gateway: external ip 195.38.200.201 internal ip 192.162.0.1
Laptop: internal ip 192.162.0.2
desktop:..
the gateway is able to access the net and the laptop.
the laptop is able to
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 12:45:18AM +0200, Brendon wrote:
'fraid it had no affect. the syslogs on both machines show nothing out of the
ordinary either
How did you setup masquerading, did you install ipmasq.deb or did
you try everything by hand?
Cheers,
Joost
and Masquerading
#
# NOTE: In IPTABLES speak, IP Masquerading is a form of SourceNAT or SNAT.
#
# NOTE #2: The following is an example for an internal LAN address in the
#192.168.0.x network with a 255.255.255.0 or a 24 bit subnet
mask
#connecting to the Internet
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 01:22:37AM +0200, Brendon wrote:
On Saturday 23 June 2001 01:11, Joost Kooij wrote:
How did you setup masquerading, did you install ipmasq.deb or did
you try everything by hand?
I used the mini howto on www.linuxnewbie.org next to the Masquerading HOWTO.
the
On Saturday 23 June 2001 01:37, you wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 01:22:37AM +0200, Brendon wrote:
On Saturday 23 June 2001 01:11, Joost Kooij wrote:
How did you setup masquerading, did you install ipmasq.deb or did
you try everything by hand?
I used the mini howto on
Turn on forwarding:
echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
--
Dwayne C. Litzenberger - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgphUNIWDB0hH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Oh yeah, instead, you can edit /etc/network/options and change:
ip_forward=no
to
ip_foward=yes
Then, either run /etc/init.d/networking restart, or reboot the system.
--
Dwayne C. Litzenberger - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp6ccRNFlCig.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dwayne C. Litzenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Turn on forwarding:
echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
That's already done. As I said, I can connect to remote systems
through the firewall machine, and data flows back and forth. It's
just that it freezes up within a couple of minutes,
My main machine, scratchy, is connected to the net using PPPOE (PPP
over ethernet) over DSL. I have another machine, cheddar, connected
to a second ethernet card on scratchy with an ethernet crossover
cable. I am trying to using netfilter (iptables) to masquerade
cheddar behind scratchy, and it
Check your routing table with 'route -n'.
Do you have a route on the Linux router machine that looks like this? --
Destination Gateway GenmaskIface
200.189.192.144 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248eth1
I guess the problem is on the ipmasq rules.
I'll put three
Hello debian users.
I am having the following ip masquerading issue:
1) I have four networks in my office
200.189.194.144 (netmask 255.255.255.248) - internet servers
10.0.0.x (netmask 255.255.255.0) - internal network
10.0.1.x (netmask 255.255.255.0) - other internal network
200.217.207.129
Guilherme Barile [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello debian users.
I am having the following ip masquerading issue:
1) I have four networks in my office
200.189.194.144 (netmask 255.255.255.248) - internet servers
10.0.0.x (netmask 255.255.255.0) - internal network
10.0.1.x (netmask
Guilherme Barile wrote:
From a computer in the 10.0.0.x network I can ping the internet (via ADSL)
and any computer on the 10.0.1.x network (vice versa for the computers on
the 10.0.1.x net) BUT, i cannot access the servers connected to NIC2 (eth1)
directly I need some special rule for
I was reading the IP masq how-to and it shows how to setup ipchains in a
rc.firewall file. From what I gather, debian uses a different boot system.
How would I make the rc.firewall for a debian system? I am new to debian, I
am used to using redhat.
Kyle Peterson wrote:
I was reading the IP masq how-to and it shows how to setup ipchains in a
rc.firewall file. From what I gather, debian uses a different boot system.
How would I make the rc.firewall for a debian system? I am new to debian, I
am used to using redhat.
i usually make a
Hi,
you can make a script and put it in /etc/init.d and make a link to one of
the /etc/rcX.d. With the number (like S40firewall) you can set the
priority.
As an alternative, in Debian you have a /etc/rc.boot where you can put
files which must be started at boottime (but not after a init 1; init
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Sebastiaan wrote:
Hi,
you can make a script and put it in /etc/init.d and make a link to one of
the /etc/rcX.d. With the number (like S40firewall) you can set the
priority.
As an alternative, in Debian you have a /etc/rc.boot where you can put
files which must be
At 11:20 AM 12/10/00 +0100, Leen Besselink wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Sebastiaan wrote:
Hi,
you can make a script and put it in /etc/init.d and make a link to one of
the /etc/rcX.d. With the number (like S40firewall) you can set the
priority.
As an alternative, in Debian you have a
Kyle == Kyle Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was reading the IP masq how-to and it shows how to setup ipchains
in a rc.firewall file. From what I gather, debian uses a different
boot system. How would I make the rc.firewall for a debian system?
I am new to debian, I am used to using
am new to debian, I am used to using redhat.
Install the 'ipmasq' Debian package. Configure, read its docs.
Nothing could be easier. (er, unless you have a non-standard
setup)
I am new to Debian, but is this still true? I do not have this package
installed, but I am doing IP masquerading
-
From: Willy Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: IP masquerading
Kyle == Kyle Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was reading the IP masq how-to and it shows how to setup ipchains
in a rc.firewall file. From what I
installed, but I am doing IP masquerading on my 2.2
installation just by making a script to execute on boot from the
commands:
ipchains -P forward DENY ipchains -A forward -i ppp0 -j MASQ echo 1
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
after launching my pppd (dial on demand).
Perhaps
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 11:00:59AM -0800, Michael Smith wrote:
I just set up a masquerade box at work in about 1.5 hours (from scratch) with
Debian. Just make your box with two nics, configure one nic for your outside
connection, configure the other for 192.168.0.1, and then install the ipmasq
was thinking to enable IP-Masquerading on one of them and build a
firewall on it as well. It will be running Samba too. Nevertheless I'd like to
continue using these PC's as Workstations.
Does that seem to be a useful approach? I would really appreciate any
opions or suggestions you might have
Hi,
I have two PC's at home and would like to share my internet connection
(DSL) between them. As I don't want a third computer here running all the time
I was thinking to enable IP-Masquerading on one of them and build a
firewall on it as well. It will be running Samba too. Nevertheless I'd like
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000 11:02:14 +0100, Robert Kasunic said:
Hi,
I have two PC's at home and would like to share my internet connection
(DSL) between them. As I don't want a third computer here running all the
time
I was thinking to enable IP-Masquerading on one of them and build
of this is that
things are easier all-round.
At 11:02 AM 11/11/00 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
I have two PC's at home and would like to share my internet connection
(DSL) between them. As I don't want a third computer here running all the time
I was thinking to enable IP-Masquerading on one of them and build
on Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:59:25PM -0700, Nate Amsden sent 1.1K bytes on
their merry way:
not sure what kernels your using but:
I am using kernel 2.2.16.
I'm using 2.2.17 (woody)
- i've never gotten MASQ to work with DNS on 2.2 i've always had to
put
a DNS on the masq machine and
and point everything to it.
Yikes! That's not a trivial task and it's of questionable value given
what I'm able to do, as stated above.
Willi Dyck wrote:
Hi.
I don't understand the world (Debian)anymore.
As soon as I compile things like
- ip firewalling
- ip masquerading
Willi Dyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Willi Dyck wrote:
Hi.
I don't understand the world (Debian)anymore.
As soon as I compile things like
- ip firewalling
- ip masquerading
- ip forwarding into the kernel, I can't ping any host by it's name.
I am able
Hi.
I don't understand the world (Debian)anymore.
As soon as I compile things like
- ip firewalling
- ip masquerading
- ip forwarding into the kernel, I can't ping any host by it's name.
I am able to ping IP's. Seems like a DNS Lookup failure. But why??
I didn't changed any file I only compiled
everything to it.
nate
Willi Dyck wrote:
Hi.
I don't understand the world (Debian)anymore.
As soon as I compile things like
- ip firewalling
- ip masquerading
- ip forwarding into the kernel, I can't ping any host by it's name.
I am able to ping IP's. Seems like a DNS Lookup failure. But why
on Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:59:25PM -0700, Nate Amsden sent 1.1K bytes on their
merry way:
not sure what kernels your using but:
I'm using 2.2.17 (woody)
- i've never gotten MASQ to work with DNS on 2.2 i've always had to put
a DNS on the masq machine and point machines to it instead, this
to it.
Yikes! That's not a trivial task and it's of questionable value given
what I'm able to do, as stated above.
Willi Dyck wrote:
Hi.
I don't understand the world (Debian)anymore.
As soon as I compile things like
- ip firewalling
- ip masquerading
- ip forwarding
)anymore.
As soon as I compile things like
- ip firewalling
- ip masquerading
- ip forwarding into the kernel, I can't ping any host by it's name.
I am able to ping IP's. Seems like a DNS Lookup failure. But why??
I didn't changed any file I only compiled the features listed above.
When
Alvin Oga wrote:
hi ya..
what flags do you have set in your linux-2.2.*/.config file ???
the ones that apply to firewalls/networking:
CONFIG_PACKET=y
CONFIG_FIREWALL=y
CONFIG_FILTER=y
CONFIG_UNIX=y
CONFIG_INET=y
CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL=y
CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE=y
CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_ICMP=y
HELP!! I can't get IPMASQ working. I've recompiled my kernel to add MASQ
support and I'm pretty sure that I got it right. I've read through the
HOW-TO but I had problems following along (I think it was written with BSD
in mind.not Sys5). Anywaysany ideas or suggestions would be
What does it say when you do: ipchains -L
Ron Rademaker
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Jason Schepman wrote:
HELP!! I can't get IPMASQ working. I've recompiled my kernel to add MASQ
support and I'm pretty sure that I got it right. I've read through the
HOW-TO but I had problems following along (I
A list of steps you've already performed would be useful in order to pinpoint
where things are going wrong.
Cheers,
Jason.
--On Wednesday, August 9, 2000 6:22 -0500 Jason Schepman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HELP!! I can't get IPMASQ working. I've recompiled my kernel to add MASQ
support
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone on this list wrote recently wondering if
they would need to recompile their kernel inorder
to get ip masquerading working.
They are using a stock kernel version 2.0.38 that
came with slink and said that when they executed the
command...
/sbin/ipfwadm
Someone on this list wrote recently wondering if
they would need to recompile their kernel inorder
to get ip masquerading working.
They are using a stock kernel version 2.0.38 that
came with slink and said that when they executed the
command...
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -p deny
they got
I guess there's some kind of module somewhere that should be loaded in
(using modprobe).
Ron Rademaker
On Fri, 26 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone on this list wrote recently wondering if
they would need to recompile their kernel inorder
to get ip masquerading working
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
