Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

On Friday 09 July 2004 14:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The following url for a forum thread on Java's site probably has the > answer for your error. I was getting the same error and used the unpack > rt.jar method mentioned on the following thread. > > http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:39:35PM -0400, H. S. wrote: > Apparently, _Michael B Allen_, on 07/09/04 04:50,typed: > > > > >Note a good way to setup the shell environment in X so you can run java > >and javac on the commandline is to start the session manager through a > >login shell by changing: >

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

Apparently, _Michael B Allen_, on 07/09/04 04:50,typed: Note a good way to setup the shell environment in X so you can run java and javac on the commandline is to start the session manager through a login shell by changing: /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99xfree86-common_start to read: exec -l $SHELL -c "$

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 10:32:57 +0300 David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Netbeans would try to execute and kick me off X. Reinstalled > everything, tried everyting. Now I only get: > # java > Error occurred during initialization of VM > java/lang/NoClassDefFoundError: java/lang/Object The fol

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 00:37:25 -0400 "H. S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > /usr/local/ and export JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/java and > > PATH=$PATH:${JAVA_HOME}/bin? > > This is what I did. I extracted the version of the Java in > /usr/local/java. Then made links

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 10:32:57 +0300 David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The update alternatives will let you choose between the java's. It does > not pickup the javac from Sun (must be manually put in there. Java must be > > manually put into alternatives as well if not done using a proper .de

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

On Friday 09 July 2004 05:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > You should go to . Get j2se-package, convert your > > JRE to a deb, download the matching *debian-deb for your Java version, > > and install both the downloaded package and the converted JRE. The > > package manageme

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

Hello Michael B Allen (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > Andreas Janssen said: >> You should go to . Get j2se-package, convert >> your JRE to a deb, download the matching *debian-deb for your Java >> version, and install both the downloaded package and the converted >> JRE. The

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

ure just to install Java? Why not just unpack the sun.com archive in /usr/local/ and export JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/java and PATH=$PATH:${JAVA_HOME}/bin? Mike This is what I did. I extracted the version of the Java in /usr/local/java. Then made links /usr/local/j2sdk -> /usr/local/java/java-versio

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

Andreas Janssen said: > You should go to . Get j2se-package, convert your > JRE to a deb, download the matching *debian-deb for your Java version, > and install both the downloaded package and the converted JRE. The > package management will take care of the symlinks in /etc/

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

e javac already (new > >>install a couple of months back). Earlier I used to download Sun's > >>j2sdk and install that. Now that I already have javac (probably > >>provided by Debian), in what way would the new installation of j2skd > >>be affected by it? &

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

(new >>> install a couple of months back). Earlier I used to download Sun's >>> j2sdk and install that. Now that I already have javac (probably >>> provided by Debian), in what way would the new installation of j2skd >>> be affected by it? >> >

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

stribution, I noticed that I have javac already (new > > > >>install a couple of months back). Earlier I used to download Sun's > >>j2sdk and install that. Now that I already have javac (probably > >>provided by Debian), in what way would the new installation of

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

Apparently, _Jacob S._, on 07/08/04 14:51,typed: On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 14:36:17 -0400 "H. S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In my Testing distribution, I noticed that I have javac already (new install a couple of months back). Earlier I used to download Sun's j2sdk and ins

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 14:36:17 -0400 "H. S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In my Testing distribution, I noticed that I have javac already (new > install a couple of months back). Earlier I used to download Sun's > j2sdk and install that. Now that I already h

Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

In my Testing distribution, I noticed that I have javac already (new install a couple of months back). Earlier I used to download Sun's j2sdk and install that. Now that I already have javac (probably provided by Debian), in what way would the new installation of j2skd be affected by it?

Re: (maybe solved -- well, not) Re: apt-get reports conflicts while installing j2sdk

On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 03:28:57PM -0500, H. S. said > Apparently, _H. S._, on 03/22/04 15:01,typed: > > >> > >>So how do I remove whateve was left over from j2sdk1.3 remove operation? > >> > > > >I think solved: > >~# dpkg --remove j2re1.3 > >~# apt-get install j2re1.4 > > > >seemed to have work

Re: (maybe solved -- well, not) Re: apt-get reports conflicts while installing j2sdk

Apparently, _H. S._, on 03/22/04 15:01,typed: So how do I remove whateve was left over from j2sdk1.3 remove operation? I think solved: ~# dpkg --remove j2re1.3 ~# apt-get install j2re1.4 seemed to have worked. Well, not exactly. Mozilla cannot find java and does not load the plugins. Here are

(maybe solved) Re: apt-get reports conflicts while installing j2sdk

Apparently, _H. S._, on 03/22/04 14:57,typed: Hi, I am running Sarge. I am trying to install Java and yesterday installed j2sdk1.3 and then realized I needed j2sdk1.4. Some problem with the glibc or gcc version. So I removed that: #> apt-get --purge remove j2sdk1.3 j2re1.3 Then I installed j2sd

apt-get reports conflicts while installing j2sdk

Hi, I am running Sarge. I am trying to install Java and yesterday installed j2sdk1.3 and then realized I needed j2sdk1.4. Some problem with the glibc or gcc version. So I removed that: #> apt-get --purge remove j2sdk1.3 j2re1.3 Then I installed j2sdk1.4 but go these errors: ~# apt-get install j

Re: Debian Woody (2.4 kernel) testing and Blackdown J2SDK 1.3.1

r > > directory at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method) > > at java.util.zip.ZipFile.(ZipFile.java:110) > > at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:115) > > at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:57) > > Not sure exactly what the problem is, but it lo

Re: Debian Woody (2.4 kernel) testing and Blackdown J2SDK 1.3.1

ibraries. The libc bug I mentioned above produced very different output anyhow (it complained about __libc_wait). > as J2SDK 1.3.1 seems *very* standard to me, i gotta admit i was kind of > shocked to find out it doesn't run although the installer doesn't > complain. actually, i had sw

Debian Woody (2.4 kernel) testing and Blackdown J2SDK 1.3.1

ZipFile.(ZipFile.java:110) at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:115) at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:57) as J2SDK 1.3.1 seems *very* standard to me, i gotta admit i was kind of shocked to find out it doesn't run although the installer doesn't complain. actually, i had swi

Re: j2sdk

Kamil Jonca wrote: >Hello. > >I have tried to install java plugin for mozilla from blackdown. Unfortunately >mozilla crashes. I just made a symlink to the java plugin in the jre directory instead of directly installing the plugin,inside the mozilla plugins directory. I think this workaround w

j2sdk

Hello. I have tried to install java plugin for mozilla from blackdown. Unfortunately mozilla crashes. I think that is j2sdk bug (or glibc) because installing jmf from blackdown causes errors: Running /usr/sbin/jmfinit... An irrecoverable stack overflow has occurred. Unexpected Signal : 11