nt.
--
I challenge you to play the game in which there is no loser but
everything is fun and worthwhile!
--- Begin Message ---
From: Evuraan
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2013 2:47:10 PM
Subject: 2013 -- KDE or GNOME?
I've been on Gnome for years. (vdpau, G
From: Paul Lane
To: debian-user
Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2013 9:18:36 PM
Subject: Re: 2013 -- KDE or GNOME?
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Go Linux wrote:
> From: Evuraan
> Subject: 2013 -- KDE or GNOME?
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Sunday, June 9, 2013, 1:47 PM
&
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Go Linux wrote:
> From: Evuraan
> Subject: 2013 -- KDE or GNOME?
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Sunday, June 9, 2013, 1:47 PM
>
> I've been on Gnome for years. (vdpau, GT430, 1080p - the typical nvidia setup)
>
> Looking
--- On Sun, 6/9/13, Evuraan wrote:
From: Evuraan
Subject: 2013 -- KDE or GNOME?
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Sunday, June 9, 2013, 1:47 PM
I've been on Gnome for years. (vdpau, GT430, 1080p - the typical nvidia setup)
Looking at http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current-live
From: Evuraan
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2013 2:47:10 PM
Subject: 2013 -- KDE or GNOME?
I've been on Gnome for years. (vdpau, GT430, 1080p - the typical nvidia setup)
Looking at http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current-live/i386/bt-hybrid/, I
gott
On Du, 09 iun 13, 11:47:10, Evuraan wrote:
>
> These days, kde or gnome - which one?
This decision is quite personal, it's better you try both and decide for
yourself.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and
Am 09.06.2013 20:47, schrieb Evuraan:
I've been on Gnome for years. (vdpau, GT430, 1080p - the typical
nvidia setup)
Looking at
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current-live/i386/bt-hybrid/, I
gotta ask:
These days, kde or gnome - which one?
iirc, kde does retina display (hig
I've been on Gnome for years. (vdpau, GT430, 1080p - the typical nvidia
setup)
Looking at http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current-live/i386/bt-hybrid/,
I gotta ask:
These days, kde or gnome - which one?
iirc, kde does retina display (high dpi), and gnome yet may not etc.
thanks in advance!
> "C" == Cybe R Wizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
C> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:35:12 +0200
C> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hubert Palme) wrote:
>> Seems to me that KDE uses xscreensaver, but I'm not sure -- the
>> cooperation netween KDE and X is pretty inscrutable for me.
>> =20
>> In the "KDE con
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:35:12 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hubert Palme) wrote:
> Seems to me that KDE uses xscreensaver, but I'm not sure -- the
> cooperation netween KDE and X is pretty inscrutable for me.
>
> In the "KDE control center" (KControl) I find "Attached devices"
> (Angeschlossene Geräte)
> "C" == Cybe R Wizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
C> On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:05:53 +0200
C> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hubert Palme) wrote:
C> sudo xset -dpms ?
>>
>> How can I make this setting the default?
>>
>> It is lost on logout and I'm still searching a central place (script?)
>> wh
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:05:53 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hubert Palme) wrote:
> C> sudo xset -dpms ?
>
> How can I make this setting the default?
>
> It is lost on logout and I'm still searching a central place (script?)
> where such settings are made when logging in on panels like kdm, xdm,
> ..
> "C" == Cybe R Wizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
C> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 01:09:30 -0400
C> Mitchell Laks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I use kde desktop and notice that my screen saver works for a while
>> and then I get a dark screen. Where is the "power" setting that is
>> doi
On Friday 15 July 2005 01:24 am, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
>
> sudo xset -dpms ?
>
Thank you very much. That is exactly what I needed to know.
It is even better to know what the command level structure is that lies behind
the gui setting !!!
Now I can play with xset.
Mitchell
> Cybe
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 01:09:30 -0400
Mitchell Laks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I use kde desktop and notice that my screen saver works for a while
> and then I get a dark screen. Where is the "power" setting that is
> doing this.
>
> I would like to waste cpu cycles running opengl screensav
Hi,
I use kde desktop and notice that my screen saver works for a while and then I
get a dark screen. Where is the "power" setting that is doing this.
I would like to waste cpu cycles running opengl screensaver instead of getting
black screen.
I know how to do this on windows.
At present on t
This is more a KDE or gnome question then a Debian question however...
In KDE 3.1 you would click on Control Center->peripherals->X Display
This will allow you to change resolution, color depth, and virtual
desktop size. It edits the XF86 Config-4 file for you automatically.
F
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 22:26, Joe Bosak wrote:
> Is there an easy way to switch between screen resolutions when using a GUI like
> KDE or Gnome?
>
> I'm using Debian 3, stable release.
>
>
> - Joe
editing your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 might help, go to the screens >
Joe Bosak wrote:
Is there an easy way to switch between screen resolutions when using a
GUI like KDE or Gnome?
I'm using Debian 3, stable release.
- Joe
Yes.
Configure your xserver ('dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86') and choose
the desired resolutions. The highest will be def
Joe Bosak wrote:
>Is there an easy way to switch between screen resolutions when using a GUI like
>KDE or Gnome?
>
>I'm using Debian 3, stable release.
+/- will cycle through the resolutions set in your X config.
--
gt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If someone tells you---
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:26:42PM +, Joe Bosak wrote:
> Is there an easy way to switch between screen resolutions when using a GUI like
> KDE or Gnome?
Try gvidm.
--
Jens Kubieziel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
millihelen, n.:
The amount of
Is there an easy way to switch between screen resolutions when using a GUI like KDE or Gnome?
I'm using Debian 3, stable release.
- Joe
On 02 Oct 2002 19:52:05 -0500
Shyamal Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joyce> So, before I do something irreversable, which is the
> Joyce> preferred desktop ?
>
> Joyce> Some peolle seem not to like kde (3) and other seems to
> Joyce> love it.
>
> Joyce> Any advice p
se.
>
> Is one better suited to this spec than the other ?
>
> Matthew Joyce
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Pastern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 3 October 2002 9:22 AM
> To: Joyce, Matthew; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Kde or gnom
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 19:13, Joyce, Matthew wrote:
>
> So, before I do something irreversable, which is the preferred desktop ?
>
> Some peolle seem not to like kde (3) and other seems to love it.
>
> Any advice please ?
>
>
Use twm until things are standardised ;)
KDE has its strengths, Gn
On Wed, 02 Oct 2002, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> Joyce> So, before I do something irreversable, which is the
> Joyce> preferred desktop ?
> Joyce> Some peolle seem not to like kde (3) and other seems to
> Joyce> love it.
> Joyce> Any advice please ?
I'm using kde 3.0.3 right n
Joyce> So, before I do something irreversable, which is the
Joyce> preferred desktop ?
Joyce> Some peolle seem not to like kde (3) and other seems to
Joyce> love it.
Joyce> Any advice please ?
Which is better. Emacs or vi? ;-)
Seriously, they are both equally nice and equa
> So, before I do something irreversable, which is
the preferred desktop ?
>
irreversable <-- you need to get used to not
using this word when talking about gnu/linux
distro's :-)
> Some peolle seem not to like kde (3) and other
seems to love it.
>
i don't really care for either of them :-)
Joyce, Matthew said:
>
> So, before I do something irreversable, which is the preferred desktop ?
>
> Some peolle seem not to like kde (3) and other seems to love it.
>
I use neither, it depends on your needs. I have been using afterstep
for at least 3 years I think, and enjoy it, it gets out of
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 3 October 2002 9:22 AM
To: Joyce, Matthew; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Kde or gnome
Try both, see for you which one you prefer by usage, not opinion. I've been
a gnome user for several years now, and i'm only just trying kde out. Both
desktops
e, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 3 October 2002 9:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Pastern
Subject: Kde or gnome
So, before I do something irreversable, which is the preferred desktop ?
Some peolle seem not to like kde (3) and other seems to love it.
Any advice please
So, before I do something irreversable, which is the preferred desktop ?
Some peolle seem not to like kde (3) and other seems to love it.
Any advice please ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 09:49:49AM +0518, USM Bish wrote:
> Just a small clarification sought :
> What exactly is meant by Gnome or KDE compliance ?
>
> Is it the capability of running Gnome or KDE apps ?
No. Window managers don't run apps, they just manage the way they are
placed on the scre
Just a small clarification sought :
What exactly is meant by Gnome or KDE compliance ?
Is it the capability of running Gnome or KDE apps ?
I'm on fvwm2 and blackbox. I've both qt (for KDE) and
necessary libs for running gnome apps installed. I am
able to run kmail, kedit (and other kde pa
Felix Natter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/09/2000 (13:02) :
> Sawfish is highly scriptable via lisp, so it probably isn't fast, either.
It is faster than the default Enlightenment at least. Neither does it
require that you have the latest video card with Open-GL and 128Mb RAM.
--
Preben Randh
Ian Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/09/2000 (10:38) :
> Read the quote again. I wrote "the only wm with _full_ support" etc.
> If sawfish is "Most integrated", the others are necessarily "less
> integrated", or not? I don't want the wm and the desktop to step over
> each other, and that
On 5 Sep 00 19:05:33 GMT, Felix Natter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Namely, Gnome does not include its own window manager; KDE does.
>> Gnome depends on hooks for Gnome support compiled into an external
>> window manager, and at present the only window manager with full
>> support for Gnome seems
Ian Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Felix" == Felix Natter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Helgi> Of course it depends on who you ask.:-) Generally I like
> Helgi> KDE because it is locical in so many ways, but I don't like how
> Helgi> big it is and therefore takes a lot of re
> "Joachim" == Joachim Trinkwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
itz> window manager, and at present the only window manager with full
itz> support for Gnome seems to be Enlightenment, AKA `E'.
Joachim> That's nonsense, many window managers have Gnome support now,
Joachim> e.g. icewm-gnome, wmake
Ian Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> window manager, and at present the only window manager with full
> support for Gnome seems to be Enlightenment, AKA `E'.
That's nonsense, many window managers have Gnome support now,
e.g. icewm-gnome, wmaker, sawfish-gnome.
Most integrated in Gnome is
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> I tried both KDE and Gnome; in fact I tried installing Gnome multiple
> times, and always came to the same conclusion (which is: I run KDE :).
> The problem I have with Gnome is a bit subtle, and not obvious to
> someone who's installing Linux or even a Linux GUI for the fir
> "Felix" == Felix Natter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Helgi> Of course it depends on who you ask.:-) Generally I like
Helgi> KDE because it is locical in so many ways, but I don't like how
Helgi> big it is and therefore takes a lot of resources, and it's not
Helgi> 'free'. Gnome is faster
Helgi Örn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> Of course it depends on who you ask.:-)
> Generally I like KDE because it is locical in so many ways, but I don't
> like how big it is and therefore takes a lot of resources, and it's not
> 'free'.
> Gnome is faster (for me) but I got problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, John Griffiths wrote:
> LET THE FLAME WARS COMMENCE
>
This list has pretty much gotten over flaming about GNOME/KDE. We prefer
to flame about licensing and social-contract wording here. 8^)
> if you hae the QT and GTK libns in place the
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 11:19:43AM +0200, Helgi Örn wrote:
> Gnome is faster (for me) but I got problems with using different
> keyboard layouts in Gnome, but it's free.
> I really love fvwm2 and icewm but there I got this problem with differet
> keyboard layouts; I don't know how to configure use
ayouts in Gnome, but it's free.
I really love fvwm2 and icewm but there I got this problem with differet
keyboard layouts; I don't know how to configure use that in them.
Helgi Örn
Daniel Gebhardt wrote:
>
> What's generally better, kde or gnome? Or is there something
ken by the new KDE 2.0
also qt licensing remains an issue
At 12:50 AM 8/11/2000 -0700, Daniel Gebhardt wrote:
>What's generally better, kde or gnome? Or is there something else out there?
>
>Thanks,
>
>-Daniel
>
>
>--
>Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 12:50:07AM -0700, Daniel Gebhardt wrote:
> What's generally better, kde or gnome? Or is there something else out
> there?
Yes.
--
Karsten M. Self http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
Evangelist, Opensales, Inc.http://www.opensales.org
W
What's generally better, kde or gnome? Or is there something else out there?
Thanks,
-Daniel
49 matches
Mail list logo
