SMP Kernel 2.0.33 compile errors

1998-04-30 Thread Pure Energy
Hi all, (Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED], i'm currently off the list) My current system : Tyan TomcatIII Duel Board (S1563D) Pentium Class 430 HX 2 Pentium 200 Non-MMX processors 64 mgs ram (mixed 70s/60s unfortunatly) 120 mgs swap partition

Re: kernel 2.0.33

1998-04-07 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Mon, Apr 06, 1998 at 10:56:09AM -0400, Lewis, James M. wrote: > I tried using my old .config file from 2.0.30 and menuconfig did not show > me the NLS and code page options. I had to use the default .config file > and go from scratch. Also, if you don't say Y to the NLS support, the > kernel

RE: kernel 2.0.33

1998-04-06 Thread Lewis, James M.
27;t any?) jim -- From: Marcus Brinkmann[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 06, 1998 12:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: The recipient's address is unknown. Subject: Re: kernel 2.0.33 On Sun, Apr 05, 1998 at 09:56:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTE

Re: kernel 2.0.33

1998-04-06 Thread Joerg Friedrich
On Sun, 5 Apr 1998, tko wrote: > Since I've upgraded to this kernel(2.0.33), whenever a "vfat" partition is > mounted, the kernel complains about not being able to find "NLS charset > cp437" > module. I haven't found anywhere in the "menuconfig&q

Re: kernel 2.0.33

1998-04-06 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sun, Apr 05, 1998 at 09:56:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Since I've upgraded to this kernel(2.0.33), whenever a "vfat" partition is > mounted, the kernel complains about not being able to find "NLS charset > cp437" > module. I haven't fo

kernel 2.0.33

1998-04-06 Thread tko
Since I've upgraded to this kernel(2.0.33), whenever a "vfat" partition is mounted, the kernel complains about not being able to find "NLS charset cp437" module. I haven't found anywhere in the "menuconfig" options a listing for that module. Any hints a

Re: compiling kernel 2.0.33, libc6-dev

1998-04-01 Thread David Stern
On Wed, 01 Apr 1998 15:11:41 PST, David Stern wrote: > > I didn't mean to imply that it was that important, but according to that READ > ME (see "Debian's libc6 method"), it looks like that should've been changed b > eginning with kernel-[headers,source]-2.0.32 . That seems like such a minor > is

Re: compiling kernel 2.0.33, libc6-dev

1998-04-01 Thread David Stern
On 01 Apr 1998 16:00:51 CST, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > >>"David" == David Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > David> Then does the kernel-* package information (whatever it's > David> called) needs to be updated? > --8> - > David> Description: Linux kernel source. This pack

Re: compiling kernel 2.0.33, libc6-dev

1998-04-01 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"David" == David Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> Then does the kernel-* package information (whatever it's David> called) needs to be updated? --8> - David> Description: Linux kernel source. This package provides the David> source code for the Linux kernel, as well a

Re: compiling kernel 2.0.33, libc6-dev

1998-04-01 Thread David Stern
On 01 Apr 1998 12:27:13 CST, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > The kernel is delibrately independent of any kernel related > header files you may have installed (or that libc6 uses). It is OK to > compile 2.0.33 on your machine. That's good. > The newer kernel-source packages do not provide kern

Re: compiling kernel 2.0.33, libc6-dev

1998-04-01 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, The kernel is delibrately independent of any kernel related header files you may have installed (or that libc6 uses). It is OK to compile 2.0.33 on your machine. The newer kernel-source packages do not provide kernel-headers anymore, since the kernel-source package is archi

compiling kernel 2.0.33, libc6-dev

1998-03-31 Thread David Stern
Hi, The 2.0.32 kernel did wonderful things for my adaptec 2940-uw, but 2.0.33 has been out for quite a while now, and I was thinking about compiling a new kernel. I'm not at all sure how libc6-dev 's dependency on "stable" 2.0.32 kernel-headers pertains to compiling a 2.0.33 kernel. Is 2.0.3

kernel 2.0.33 smbfs bug

1998-03-10 Thread Rainer Clasen
Hi! there is a bug in kernel 2.0.33 which woes files' timestamp on mounted NT4 shares. There is already a bugfix patch, which seems to slip into 2.0.34. kernel-source-2.0.33-2 didn't include this patch. My questions: -shall I report this as bug or wait till kernel-*-2.0.34? -against

Re: kernel 2.0.33

1998-03-10 Thread Adam Klein
On Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 02:44:07PM -0300, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote: > Can I use the 2.0.33 deb package from hamm in a bo machine without > upgrade the whole system to hamm? Yes. Adam Klein -- E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING

Re: Kernel 2.0.33 questions

1998-03-09 Thread Ian Eure
Martin Jackson wrote: > I recently bought an HP 7200i CD-RW, an internal EIDE device. I was > wondering if > > 1) Kernel 2.0.33 (or perhaps one of the 2.1 series) supports CD-RW format? Not a kernel issue. The kernel supports ATAPI (e/ide) devices- so if the drive reads

kernel 2.0.33

1998-03-09 Thread Mario Olimpio de Menezes
HI, Can I use the 2.0.33 deb package from hamm in a bo machine without upgrade the whole system to hamm? Thanks, []s Mario O.de Menezes"Many are the plans in a man's heart, but IPEN-CNEN/SP is the Lord's purpose that prevails" http://curiango.ipen

Kernel 2.0.33 questions

1998-03-09 Thread Martin Jackson
I recently bought an HP 7200i CD-RW, an internal EIDE device. I was wondering if 1) Kernel 2.0.33 (or perhaps one of the 2.1 series) supports CD-RW format? 2) Kernel 2.0.33 supports the Joliet extensions to ISO9660? 3) Any CD-Writer software currently available for Linux natively supports