On 08 Feb 1999q, Joey Hess wrote:
> Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > don't - in fact, I've even wired my speaker through the turbo switch so
> > it's off most of the time!
>
> Hm, do you dislike beeps or what? It's pretty trivial to patch the kernel to
> disable beeps, I could make a loadable module th
Anthony Campbell wrote:
> don't - in fact, I've even wired my speaker through the turbo switch so
> it's off most of the time!
Hm, do you dislike beeps or what? It's pretty trivial to patch the kernel to
disable beeps, I could make a loadable module that disabled kernel beeps
while it was loaded i
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Anthony Campbell wrote:
: On 02 Feb 1999q, Gary L. Hennigan wrote:
: >
: > 'Fraid I can't help you with that. I usually just download the raw
: > kernel source and use make-kpkg to get a kernel-image*.deb. I've never
: > had a need to build the kernel-source and kernel-h
On 03 Feb 1999q, E.L. Meijer Eric" wrote:
> Anthony replied:
> > What is the point of doing this? I've always compiled my own kernels from
> > source, in both RedHat and Debian, and never felt the need to use either
> > .rpm or .deb versions. Perhaps it's because I don't use lilo but prefer
> > loa
>What is the point of doing this? I've always compiled my own kernels from
>source, in both RedHat and Debian, and never felt the need to use either
>.rpm or .deb versions. Perhaps it's because I don't use lilo but prefer
>loadlin.
Compiling a kernel is not a problem, but I only installed the base
> On 02 Feb 1999q, Gary L. Hennigan wrote:
> >
> > 'Fraid I can't help you with that. I usually just download the raw
> > kernel source and use make-kpkg to get a kernel-image*.deb. I've never
> > had a need to build the kernel-source and kernel-headers
> > packages. You'll have to rely on one of
On 02 Feb 1999q, Gary L. Hennigan wrote:
>
> 'Fraid I can't help you with that. I usually just download the raw
> kernel source and use make-kpkg to get a kernel-image*.deb. I've never
> had a need to build the kernel-source and kernel-headers
> packages. You'll have to rely on one of the maintai
>The kernel-source is available as debs from ftp://ftp.netgod.bnet/linux/v2.2 .
>I don't know if they are official packages, but at least they're debs.
I installed the kernel-image*.deb, but there are many modules missing
(vfat, hpfs, hisax,...). If I compile the kernel-source deb, could I
compile
> *- On 2 Feb, M.C. Vernon wrote about "Re: Where is kernel 2.2.0?"
> > On 2 Feb 1999, Gary L. Hennigan wrote:
> >
> >> Mike Garfias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> | M.C. Vernon spoke forth with the blessed manuscript:
>
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, M.C. Vernon wrote:
> On 2 Feb 1999, Gary L. Hennigan wrote:
>
> > Mike Garfias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | M.C. Vernon spoke forth with the blessed manuscript:
> > | > I saw the uploaded message days ago, and sunsite still doesn't have the
> > | > kernel-source or k
*- On 2 Feb, M.C. Vernon wrote about "Re: Where is kernel 2.2.0?"
> On 2 Feb 1999, Gary L. Hennigan wrote:
>
>> Mike Garfias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | M.C. Vernon spoke forth with the blessed manuscript:
>> | > I saw the uploaded mes
"M.C. Vernon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 2 Feb 1999, Gary L. Hennigan wrote:
|
| > Mike Garfias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | M.C. Vernon spoke forth with the blessed manuscript:
| > | > I saw the uploaded message days ago, and sunsite still doesn't have the
| > | > kernel-source or
On 2 Feb 1999, Gary L. Hennigan wrote:
> Mike Garfias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | M.C. Vernon spoke forth with the blessed manuscript:
> | > I saw the uploaded message days ago, and sunsite still doesn't have the
> | > kernel-source or kernel-headers packages available yet :(
> It's usu
Mike Garfias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| M.C. Vernon spoke forth with the blessed manuscript:
| > I saw the uploaded message days ago, and sunsite still doesn't have the
| > kernel-source or kernel-headers packages available yet :(
| >
| > ftp.debian.org doesn't either
| >
| > Matthew
| >
M.C. Vernon spoke forth with the blessed manuscript:
> I saw the uploaded message days ago, and sunsite still doesn't have the
> kernel-source or kernel-headers packages available yet :(
>
> ftp.debian.org doesn't either
>
> Matthew
>
>
[snip]
Try ftp.kernel.org
I saw the uploaded message days ago, and sunsite still doesn't have the
kernel-source or kernel-headers packages available yet :(
ftp.debian.org doesn't either
Matthew
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Steward of the Cambridge Tolkien Society
Selwyn College Computer Support
http://www.cam.ac
Feb-99 Jan Krupa wrote:
> >
> > Is there somebody using the kernel 2.2.0 with debian2.0 ?
>
> Hamm has some programs that are not new enoufg for 2.2.0. You need to get
> slink.
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
On 01-Feb-99 Jan Krupa wrote:
>
> Is there somebody using the kernel 2.2.0 with debian2.0 ?
Hamm has some programs that are not new enoufg for 2.2.0. You need to get
slink.
Is there somebody using the kernel 2.2.0 with debian2.0 ?
It seems that the compilation process is finished successfully.
I copied the new zImage and System.map to /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.0 and
System.map-2.2.0
and changed the link of /vmlinuz to /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.0.
Next invoked 'lilo'
On 01 Feb 1999q, Helge Hafting wrote:
>
> > Those of you who have moved to 2.2.0---have you noticed serious
> > improvements in performance over the 2.0.xx kernels?
>
> You won't see much improvements in performance for a machine
> that runs a light load only. This is typical for the home/hobby
Lawrence Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have found almost miraculous performance gains.
Me too. I find that apps which took a while to load, like Applix,
Netscape etc. now load at least twice as fast. The increase in speed
cannot entirely be attributed to UDMA transfers since I have used
pa
My roommate and I noticed that it booted up much faster. Probablly
because of the new PCI ide driver, and the bus mastering support but my
chipset VIA is still under experimental :(
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> |> 2.2.0 will be available in deb packages, Real Soon Now (tm),
> |> I'm sure.
I have found almost miraculous performance gains.
*--* Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*--* Voice: 425.739.4247
*--* Fax: 425.827.9577
*--* HTTP://www.otak-k.com/~lawrence/
--
- - - - - - O t a k i n c . - - - - -
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Those of you who have moved to 2.2.0---have you noticed serious
> improvements in performance over the 2.0.xx kernels?
You won't see much improvements in performance for a machine
that runs a light load only. This is typical for the home/hobby
machines that many people have. Try pushing it wi
"Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is strange -- I too had a mysterious lockup with the same symptom you
> describe, but with 2.2.0 (the release version.). I'm running a 5X86-133 (this
> is
> a 486 from AMD) on an ASUS PCI/I-SP3.
OK, so it might not have been the one-off I t
I haven't seen any big differences in performance yet, but there are
several differences in how things are done in many cases. Read
Documentation/Changes.
2.2.1 is now out with a few bug fixes.
Bob
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> |>2.2.0 will be available in deb packages,
|> 2.2.0 will be available in deb packages, Real Soon Now (tm),
|> I'm sure. Since slink is now in 'frozen' status, the kernel will
|> show up in potato, not slink, I think.
Thanks to the many people who responded to my earlier question about
things to watch for in compiling and installing
Robert Rati wrote:
>
> The 2.2.0 kernels were released recently, but I don't see them in the
> slink distribution. Are they in potato, or have they not been packaged
> yet?
>
2.2.0 will be available in deb packages, Real Soon Now (tm), I'm
sure. Since slink is now in 'frozen' status,
The 2.2.0 kernels were released recently, but I don't see them in the
slink distribution. Are they in potato, or have they not been packaged
yet?
Rob
===
[EMAIL PRO
FWIW, I've compiled 2.2.1 without problems and it seems to be running
perfectly under hamm on both a desktop Cyrix DX486/100 and a laptop
Toshiba 4000CDT.
The only change I had to make, following on another message in this list,
was to change my /etc/printcap to use /dev/lp0 instead of /dev/lp1.
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999 18:14:27 +1300, Carey Evans wrote:
>Philip Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> ARe you using 2.2.0 with IDE? I found a message on dejanews listing
>> severals bugs on include freezing and corruption of certain IDE
>> drives.
>
>Actually, I'm now running 2.2.1 with IDE drive
Philip Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ARe you using 2.2.0 with IDE? I found a message on dejanews listing
> severals bugs on include freezing and corruption of certain IDE
> drives.
Actually, I'm now running 2.2.1 with IDE drives. I had one mysterious
lockup with -pre8, where new programs
On 29 Jan 1999q, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> > I was afraid that would be the answer. There is actually a more compressed
> > version, with a bz suffix; it is *only* about 10 Meg. But how do you
> > decompress this?
>
> Use bunzip2 (in the bzip2 package)
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> I was afraid that would be the answer. There is actually a more compressed
> version, with a bz suffix; it is *only* about 10 Meg. But how do you
> decompress this?
Use bunzip2 (in the bzip2 package). And get 2.2.1 instead of 2.2.0. For
future upd
> I was afraid that would be the answer. There is actually a more compressed
> version, with a bz suffix; it is *only* about 10 Meg. But how do you
> decompress this?
Get bz2cat/bunzip/bzip2, from the bzip2 package.
bz2cat will decompress to stdout, much like zcat. Useful for patches
and compr
On 28 Jan 1999q, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 28 Jan, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > On a slightly different theme, will there be patches available to upgrade
> > 2.0.36 to 2.2.0, or do we have to start afresh? As this would be a 12 Meg
> > download, it would take a long time and be expensive :(
> >
ARe you using 2.2.0 with IDE? I found a message on dejanews listing
severals
bugs on include freezing and corruption of certain IDE drives.
BTW: I just salvaged my config part ways my source code completely
and am re partioning my usr and root directories now.
Philip Thiem
Carey Evans wrote:
>
*- On 28 Jan, Odin wrote about "Samba and kernel 2.2.0"
>
>
> Any ideas? I have seen a special samba mounter for kernels 2.1.x, is
> there something similar for 2.2.x?
>
You need to install the smbfsx package which has the smbmount compiled
against the 2.1.x(which is
*- On 28 Jan, Gary L. Hennigan wrote about "Re: kernel 2.2.0"
>
> So if slink is frozen, meaning nothing but bug fixes can be put into
> the distribution, how can putting 2.2.x into it be justified? Please
> don't read this as negative or sarcastic, I'm genui
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 28 Jan, Anthony Campbell wrote:
| > On a slightly different theme, will there be patches available to upgrade
| > 2.0.36 to 2.2.0, or do we have to start afresh? As this would be a 12 Meg
| > download, it would take a long time and be expensive :(
|
| I'm afraid tha
I have recently compiled kernel 2.2.0 and am having some samba
difficulties now.
This is the sort of thing I get with smbmount
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~]# smbmount //alpha/LAAS /mnt
Password:
mount error: Invalid argument
Please look at smbmount's manual page for possible reasons
smbclient
On 28 Jan, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On a slightly different theme, will there be patches available to upgrade
> 2.0.36 to 2.2.0, or do we have to start afresh? As this would be a 12 Meg
> download, it would take a long time and be expensive :(
>
>
> Anthony
>
>
I'm afraid that enough has cha
On a slightly different theme, will there be patches available to upgrade
2.0.36 to 2.2.0, or do we have to start afresh? As this would be a 12 Meg
download, it would take a long time and be expensive :(
Anthony
--
Anthony Campbell - running Linux Debian 2.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ac
Richard Kaszeta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> The kernel builds fine, but when it boots, it stops at
> 'Starting kswapd v 1.5' and the machine hangs.
It might be the next thing _after_ kswapd causing the problem.
The next kernel message I get after this line is 'Detected PS/2 Mouse
Port.
esterday, I got
> Kernel 2.2.0 and it seem to be working; but not 100%.
Support for the Ensoniq chipset cards is new in 2.2 kernels (it's been in
2.1 for a while).
> When I try cat something.au > /dev/dsp, I do get some
> sound, but the volume is TOO low. I have to practically
>
Hi,
I have a Creative Ensoniq AudioPCI that used to work with Windowss NT.
I installed Debian 2.0 couple of months back and had not
made any attempts to get sound to work. Yesterday, I got
Kernel 2.2.0 and it seem to be working; but not 100%.
I enabled CONFIG_SOUND_ES1370 as module while
Wow... I've been running a nice, solid, stable pair of 2.0.34 and 2.0.36
systems. Decide to upgrade to 2.2.0 kernel. Download, see warnings on
versions of required packages. Test versions, lots out of date. Change
dselect from dists/stable to dists/unstable, . Change to dists/frozen
(yeah, I forgot
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 04:59:04PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > What does it mean when there is and question mark (?) in front of the file
> > instead of the other symbol?
>
> Pass. This is to do with the FTP site you get your files from.
Actually I think this has more todo with the Netscape bro
urations. Things may stop working every now and then
in the development kernel - new features sometimes mean new bugs.
> Is kernel 2.2.0 stable or dev?
Stable.
> What is the different between 2.2.0.tar.bz2 and 2.2.0.tar.gz?
One is compressed with bzip2, the other with gzip. While the .bz2 f
Scott J. Geertgens wrote:
>
> Tam Ma wrote:
>
> > How come all I hear about is kernel 2.0.36 and kernel 2.2.0, what
> > the following version in between, are they not working
> >
> > linux-2.0.4.tar.gz 08-Jul-1996 00:00 5.7M
>
*- Tam Ma wrote about "kernel 2.2.0"
> Hi,
>
> Can someone tell me what is the different between the
> "developement" version from the "stable" version of a kernel?
A developement kernel is one that is currently being modified and
updated and co
d to be very stable. When Linus feels that the current
development kernel is 'ready', he releases it as a 'stable' version. At
that point, the only changes allowed are bug fixes (it's not quite that
simple, however0.
>
> Is kernel 2.2.0 stable or dev?
If the second nu
On 27-Jan-99, Tam Ma took time to write :
> Hi,
>
> Can someone tell me what is the different between the
> "developement" version from the "stable" version of a kernel?
>
> Is kernel 2.2.0 stable or dev?
is stable, as are all kernels with 0,2,4
an occasionally do nasty things. The stable version is of
course, stable, and is one that is no longer in development and has been
more rigrously tested.
> Is kernel 2.2.0 stable or dev?
2.2.0 is part of the stable line. 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.3, etc will be
minor bug fixes, but still considere
Hi,
Can someone tell me what is the different between the
"developement" version from the "stable" version of a kernel?
Is kernel 2.2.0 stable or dev?
What is the different between 2.2.0.tar.bz2 and 2.2.0.tar.gz?
What does it mean when there is and question mark
Rafael Kitover writes ("Re: Kernel 2.2.0 on a 486DX2/66"):
>Are you using hamm? slink? "kswapd" is part of the util-linux package, and
>according to docs needs the newest version for 2.2, you should get the
>util-linux package from potato. (this may or may not be the
Well, I've already used 2.2.0 with success on two of my pentiumII
machines, so I figured I'd try it out on my 486DX2/66 that I am
setting up as a home machine for my janitor.
I'm building custom kernels with kernel-package 6.03, and using
pristine 2.2.0 source. I've made sure I've built with with
The sd_mod module in 2.2.0-pre6 doesn't seem to work for me; lots of
missing symbols. Anyone else experienced this? Not serious since my
Zip drive is all that's affected here, but annoying because otherwise
everything works well.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3TYD [EMAIL PROTECTED], [E
Ok folks, I just finished updating my slink system (it was a bit out of
date before). However, I still can't get ppp working with a 2.2.0-p3
kernel I recently compiled.
The symptoms are:
Jan 9 00:18:20 cnhobbes chat[280]: Password
Jan 9 00:18:20 cnhobbes chat[280]: -- got it
Jan 9 00:18:20
Ruud de Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> a) It seems that the initailisation of the COM ports is changed. I saw a
> message during boot that something was wrong.
Install the new version of "setserial" from slink or potato.
> b) I could not find a way to access my ZIP drive (parallel). It seem
I have basicly the same question but differnt problems. Everthing works
on my server except ip aliasing. Ie Only one of my web sites show up.
Do I need a new ifconfig or such? Would it be easier to just upgrade to
slink?
---
Mike Deal - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.zonenet.net / www.northwestext
I've downloaded yesterday from an Debbian mirror in the US a 2.2.0-pre1
kernel for Debian in .deb format. I've installed the kernel with dpkg to
give it a try.
The system booted up, but I've received a number of errors.
a) It seems that the initailisation of the COM ports is changed. I saw a
mess
62 matches
Mail list logo
