-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 09:12:42PM +0100, Shango Oluwa wrote:
Why, if 2.4.x is more recent secure, is my Debian 3 (woody) CD
distribution built with kernel 2.2.20 ?
Cause 2.4 wasn't out long enough to be well tested before Woody came out.
- --
Shango == Shango Oluwa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shango Why, if 2.4.x is more recent secure, is my Debian 3
Shango (woody) CD distribution built with kernel 2.2.20 ?
and in response to several good explanations Shango asks:
Shango Is kernel 2.4.21 considered safe for a
Greetings all,
I have been thinking deep thoughts about this:
Why, if 2.4.x is more recent secure, is my Debian 3 (woody) CD distribution
built with kernel 2.2.20 ?
I am a new user and this might be a naive question, but why?
why?
Shango
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by
On Sunday 06 July 2003 22:12, Shango Oluwa wrote:
Why, if 2.4.x is more recent secure, is my Debian 3 (woody) CD
distribution built with kernel 2.2.20 ?
Mostly because the 2.4 series had some serious (as in don't use for
production machines) problems when Woody was locked.
--
Got Backup?
Nicos wrote:
Mostly because the 2.4 series had some serious (as in don't use for
production machines) problems when Woody was locked.
Understood.
Is kernel 2.4.21 considered safe for a production machine now?
I'm configuring an internet router and have been advised to use 2.4.21
- I have also
On Sunday 06 July 2003 23:18, Shango Oluwa wrote:
- I have also considered LRP but that distribution seems to be
crumbling and unsupported
The guy who did the LRP just recently gave up, so you aren't likely to see
anything new from that thing soon.
--
Got Backup?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
El Sun, 06 Jul 2003 21:12:42 +0100 Shango Oluwa [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Why, if 2.4.x is more recent secure, is my Debian 3 (woody) CD distribution
built with kernel 2.2.20 ?
Obviously you haven't looked at the latest security issues in 2.4.X kernels.
BTW; the default 2.4.18-bf2.4 ate my
7 matches
Mail list logo
