Re: kernel upgrade options - follow-up

1999-10-18 Thread Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, John wrote: > >Are you sure you're not confusing the kernel headers in /usr/include/linux > >with the actual kernel source tree that is usually placed in > >/usr/src/linux? > > > I may well be, but what is certain is that /usr/src contains o

Re: kernel upgrade options - follow-up

1999-10-18 Thread John
on 17 Oct 99, Brad wrote...(inter alia)... > >Please put plank lines between the quoted text and replies, it makes things >easier to find > >On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, John wrote: > >> >> According to the Howto the kernel should be in /usr/src/linux - it >> >> seems to be in /usr/include/linux/2.0.36

Re: kernel upgrade options - follow-up

1999-10-17 Thread Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Please put plank lines between the quoted text and repies, it makes things easier to find On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, John wrote: > I've now discovered that my Debian CD-ROM contains kernel-source- > 2.2.1 under the devel directory. Can I not use this? I'd like to avo

Re: kernel upgrade options - follow-up

1999-10-17 Thread John
on 16 Oct 99, Brad wrote... > >On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, John wrote: > >> It seems an opportunity to upgrade to 2.2.7, and etc, etc > >i'd recommend 2.2.12 (the latest), although 2.2.7 might be my second >choice. > I've now discovered that my Debian CD-ROM contains kernel-source- 2.2.1 under the devel