Dear Friend,
This letter may come to you as a surprise due to the fact that we have
not yet met. The message could be strange but reel if you pay some
attention to it. I could have notified you about it at least for the sake of
your
integrity. Please accept my sincere apologies. In bringing thi
Dear Friend,
This letter may come to you as a surprise due to the fact that we have
not yet met. The message could be strange but reel if you pay some
attention to it. I could have notified you about it at least for the sake of
your
integrity. Please accept my sincere apologies. In bringing thi
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 04:35:59PM -0500, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 22:09:45 +0100
> "Colin Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (I believe that being subscribed does mean that you get whitelisted by
> > the spam checks, though.)
>
> There are spam checks in use?
As of a few
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 22:09:45 +0100
"Colin Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I believe that being subscribed does mean that you get whitelisted by
> the spam checks, though.)
There are spam checks in use? I'm just a little shocked at the pieces
that have made it through then. Perhaps, as yo
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:46:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BTW as "Walter Hombold" I am not subscribed to the debian-user-list and
> still I can post? I am subscribed with a _different_ name
> though. Can this be the reason why my post as "Walter" does not bounce?
With the exception of
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 08:17:57PM +0200, Walter Hombold wrote:
>> "laurent mpeti kabila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > REQUEST FOR URGENT BUSINESS ASSISTANCE
>> > --
>> > Your contact was availed to me by the ch
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 08:17:57PM +0200, Walter Hombold wrote:
> "laurent mpeti kabila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > REQUEST FOR URGENT BUSINESS ASSISTANCE
> > --
> > Your contact was availed to me by the chamber of commerce. It was given
>
> As I found
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Walter Hombold wrote:
> As I found your first e-mail in my trash-box: So why then do you ask me
> again for Fax & Telephone Numbers since you _already_ must know them,
> as you stated that _all_ necessary information were made available to
> you from the above source.
>
> Look
]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 05:23:49 -0500
Subject: Re: kindly get back to me
ATTN:
THANK FOR THE RESPONSES. PLEASE KINDLY PROVIDE US WITH ALL YOUR
CONTACTS ADDRESSES. INCLUDING YOUR TELEPHONE AND FAX NUMBER FOR MORE
DETAIL.WAITING FOR YOUR URGENT RESPONSE.
REGARD.
>
> Looking forward for
well this seems to be interesting let me know if you need more
assistance :-)
"laurent mpeti kabila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> REQUEST FOR URGENT BUSINESS ASSISTANCE
> --
> Your contact was availed to me by the chamber of commerce. It was given
> to me be
REQUEST FOR URGENT BUSINESS ASSISTANCE
--
Your contact was availed to me by the chamber of commerce. It was given
to me because of my diplomatic status as I did not disclose the actual
reasons for which I sought your contact. But I was assured
That you are reput
11 matches
Mail list logo