Re: libmp3lame.so -- where?

> > > > Hm. I *think* there's a configure option to build it... but looking > > through the Makefile it doesn't seem to get built by just 'make'. > > The configure option --enable-shared is on by default, and thus probably > is broken someplace along the way. Yup. Noticed that. Found this in a

Re: libmp3lame.so -- where?

On 09 Aug 2001 11:26:06 -0400, Mike McGuire wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 11:07:19PM +0100, James Green wrote: > > I've been battling to make 'vcr' work for some time now, and it's > > moaning about a lack of libmp3lame.so at runtime. > > > > The library is allegedly found in lame, which isn't

Re: libmp3lame.so -- where?

On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 11:07:19PM +0100, James Green wrote: > I've been battling to make 'vcr' work for some time now, and it's > moaning about a lack of libmp3lame.so at runtime. > > The library is allegedly found in lame, which isn't in Debian. I > downloaded the source tarball, created a deb f

libmp3lame.so -- where?

I've been battling to make 'vcr' work for some time now, and it's moaning about a lack of libmp3lame.so at runtime. The library is allegedly found in lame, which isn't in Debian. I downloaded the source tarball, created a deb from it, only to find it only creates libmp3lame.a, not .so. I looked at