RE: lilo (linux only hd - dos only hd), no solution possible?

1998-10-30 Thread Shaleh
/dev/hda is pure linux /dev/hdc is pure windows /dev/hdb is a cdrom Been using it for a year. Next time please use Subject:'s that catch the eye. I skipped the catch-22 discussion. 1000 e-mails a day makes one read selectively. boot=/dev/hda1 compact install=/boot/boot.b map=/boot/map

RE: lilo (linux only hd - dos only hd), no solution possible?

1998-10-30 Thread H C Pumphrey
Hi I've been following this thread as I have W98 on /dev/hda and Debian on /dev/hdb (Keep them nice and separate, I thought) and I havn't configured lilo yet, I'm still booting off a floppy. I was planning to sit down with the LILO manual (recommended reading) sometime and fix it up, but

lilo (linux only hd - dos only hd), no solution possible?

1998-10-29 Thread Kevin Grant
Thanks for the help I've gotten on this so far. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be working. I seem to be caught in a catch-22 situation as far as getting the system to behave as I want it to. Here's the situation: I have one dos/windows only hd. I have one linux only hd. I want to be able

Re: lilo (linux only hd - dos only hd), no solution possible?

1998-10-29 Thread W. Paul Mills
Kevin Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks for the help I've gotten on this so far. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be working. I seem to be caught in a catch-22 situation as far as getting the system to behave as I want it to. Here's the situation: I have one dos/windows only hd. I

Re: lilo (linux only hd - dos only hd), no solution possible?

1998-10-29 Thread stephen . p . ryan
On 29 Oct, Kevin Grant wrote: Thanks for the help I've gotten on this so far. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be working. I seem to be caught in a catch-22 situation as far as getting the system to behave as I want it to. Here's the situation: I have one dos/windows only hd. I have one

Re: lilo (linux only hd - dos only hd), no solution possible?

1998-10-29 Thread Laurent PICOULEAU
On Thu, Oct 29, 1998 at 05:19:24AM +, Kevin Grant wrote: Thanks for the help I've gotten on this so far. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be working. I seem to be caught in a catch-22 situation as far as getting the system to behave as I want it to. Here's the situation: I have one