On Friday, January 31, 2003 11:15, Michael Wardle wrote:
I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
sent.
As Nathan and others pointed out, there was an unusually high amount of
Internet traffic around
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 07:36:00PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
| On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
|
| At present, SPI cannot accept donations in Canadian currency due to the
| reluctance of U.S. banks to deal with Canadian
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 09:20:46PM -0900, Andy wrote:
OTOH there's no argument that the debian list server is probably in
need of an upgrade. I've no idea what they've got right now, but I'm
sure donations will be accepted :-)
WellI will be the first to step up to the plate!
I
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
At present, SPI cannot accept donations in Canadian currency due to the
reluctance of U.S. banks to deal with Canadian funds. SPI is currently
evaluating the possibility of opening an account in a Canadian bank.
:/
Then again, i've always been
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:59:59 +1100
bob parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may be due to circumstances at the time. I've been subscribed for a few
months now and I find that my messages are returned at any time between a
minute and a couple of hours maximum.
Possible postfix problem on
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 07:36:00PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
| On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
|
| At present, SPI cannot accept donations in Canadian currency due to the
| reluctance of U.S. banks to deal with Canadian funds. SPI is currently
| evaluating the possibility of
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 10:57:09PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
That's almost funny. Around here, Canadian coins (quaters, dimes,
nickels, pennies) are treated as equal to US coins by people and
cashiers. (vending machines won't take Canadian, though) I can't
speak for the local
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 01:00, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 10:57:09PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
That's almost funny. Around here, Canadian coins (quaters, dimes,
nickels, pennies) are treated as equal to US coins by people and
cashiers. (vending machines won't take
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 01:18:30AM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
Which is why many Canadian stores dealing with American currency advise
customers that they would be usually further ahead to use debit or
credit cards and hopefully take advantage of the card issuer's bulk
currency exchange rates.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 11:15:29AM +1100, Michael Wardle wrote:
I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
sent.
You must be new to the Internet. Email and news have no gauranteed
delivery time. Be
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:15, Michael Wardle wrote:
Hi
I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
sent. Among other things, this typically results in several identical
responses to a question, as
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 08:36:01PM -0600, Jason Pepas wrote:
On Thursday 30 January 2003 06:15 pm, Michael Wardle wrote:
Hi
I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
sent. Among other things,
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 11:15:29AM +1100, Michael Wardle wrote:
Hi
I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
sent. Among other things, this typically results in several identical
responses to a
Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 08:36:01PM -0600, Jason Pepas wrote:
On Thursday 30 January 2003 06:15 pm, Michael Wardle wrote:
Hi
I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
sent.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 05:37:09PM +, Sean Burlington wrote:
Nathan E Norman wrote:
[ snip ]
I'm sure if someone donated a more powerful machine and more
bandwidth, it would help.
I've some opinions for slowness:
1) Overall crappiness of the Internet due to the exploit du jour.
2)
Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 05:37:09PM +, Sean Burlington wrote:
mail does seem to get stuck on the mailserver at debian for a couple of
hours
Sometimes, but not all the time. Thus, we can conclude that this is
not a constant problem.
so it's probably not down to
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 08:51:28PM +, Sean Burlington wrote:
Nathan E Norman wrote:
Say, do those other mailing lists (why would you need other lists??
:-) apply spamfilter to every message?
some do some don't - but this is by far the slowest list I can
remember subscribing to
There
Sean Burlington said:
No offense, but I seriously doubt that last Friday and Saturday you were
getting replies in under a minute from any mailing list.
no but I have since monday
some additional data. redhat's user list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has
been pretty responsive recently, but today it
Narins, Josh wrote:
DEAR DEBIAN USER, this is joke e-mail. I think.
We are manipulating the time in the headers
in order to cover the tracks from our efforts
to monitor the e-amail from sketchy users
such as yourself
to prevent them from posting rude or obnoxious e-mails
We've noted your
OTOH there's no argument that the debian list server is probably in
need of an upgrade. I've no idea what they've got right now, but I'm
sure donations will be accepted :-)
WellI will be the first to step up to the plate!
I will donate $100 (US) right NOW!
It is the least I can do
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 09:20:46PM -0900, Andy wrote:
| OTOH there's no argument that the debian list server is probably in
| need of an upgrade. I've no idea what they've got right now, but I'm
| sure donations will be accepted :-)
|
| WellI will be the first to step up to the plate!
|
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:29:56PM -0800, nate wrote:
some additional data. redhat's user list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has
been pretty responsive recently, but today it seems to have stalled,
Really? I've always gotten better responses out of debian-user. *duck*
--
.''`. Baloo [EMAIL
Hi
I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
sent. Among other things, this typically results in several identical
responses to a question, as subscribers are unaware that somebody has
already responded.
On Thursday 30 January 2003 06:15 pm, Michael Wardle wrote:
Hi
I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
sent. Among other things, this typically results in several identical
responses to a question,
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 11:15:29AM +1100, Michael Wardle wrote:
| I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
| receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
| sent.
It varies over time. Sometimes the list is processed very rapidly,
and sometimes
25 matches
Mail list logo
