On Sunday 20 June 2004 03:58, Jules Dubois wrote:
[...]
I don't have the URL handy, but debian.org has an APT user's guide.
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/
--
richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Thanks to all those helpful people who responded.
I have three HDs and around 70G free, so I'll keep Knoppix as my working
system and gradually work up a true Debian system on a separate
partition. From discussions on this list it seems that
testing (sarge) is the way to go initially.
I have
on my own system, rather than
extensively use the resources of debian.org.
Secondly, is the explanation for this listing
in
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.de.debian.org_pub_debian_dists_testing_main_binary-i386_Packages
Package: abiword
Priority: extra
Section: editors
Installed-Size: 48
...
Description
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 09:03:47PM -0400, Brian Astill wrote:
I have just started to use Debian - some would say I still haven't
started because I'm using Knoppix 3.4 installed on my HD. sigh
[snip]
Is there a list of packages sorted by Section, rather than by Package,
without logging
Brian Astill wrote:
I have just started to use Debian - some would say I still haven't
started because I'm using Knoppix 3.4 installed on my HD. sigh
sigh all you want, but Knoppix is not Debian; it is based on Debian.
Having said that, I'd agree that you're now located in the Debian
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 09:03:47PM -0400, Brian Astill wrote:
I have just started to use Debian - some would say I still haven't
started because I'm using Knoppix 3.4 installed on my HD. sigh
...
Is there a list of packages sorted by Section, rather than by Package,
without logging
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 09:49:52AM -0500, Kent West wrote:
Brian Astill wrote:
I have just started to use Debian - some would say I still haven't
started because I'm using Knoppix 3.4 installed on my HD. sigh
sigh all you want, but Knoppix is not Debian; it is based on Debian.
Having
On Monday 10 May 2004 22:22, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
Paul Johnson had the gall to say:
Derrick 'dman' Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
Almost. murphy generates a bounce and sends it to the list manager
(mailman, majordomo, ezmlm, etc. - I don't know what one murphy is
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: OT: Viruses on lists
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 09:45:51 +0200
From: steef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 10 May 2004 22:22, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
Paul Johnson had the gall to say:
Derrick 'dman' Hudson [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My choice is to simply drop viruses. I don't expect to have any legit
messages falsely identified as viral, and dropping the message simply
removes waste from the network bandwidth and disk storage
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:22:41PM +0100, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
Paul Johnson had the gall to say:
Derrick 'dman' Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
Almost. murphy generates a bounce and sends it to the list manager
(mailman, majordomo, ezmlm, etc. - I don't know what one murphy
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 02:06:43PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
Almost. murphy generates a bounce and sends it to the list manager
(mailman, majordomo, ezmlm, etc. - I don't know what one murphy is
running). The list manager then counts that against you in its
determination of which
, however, reject messages with certain spam-like characteristics
(for example, invalid sender domain). As a result, one of the lists I
subscribe to periodically sends me a probe to see if my address
really is invalid. Of course, the probe works and I am not removed
from the list, but it is still
Derrick 'dman' Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Since the mail has already been received and accepted by murphy, am
| I just pushing the sending of spoofed bounce messages one stage back
| up the email processing ladder?
Almost. murphy generates a bounce and sends it to the list manager
Paul Johnson had the gall to say:
Derrick 'dman' Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
Almost. murphy generates a bounce and sends it to the list manager
(mailman, majordomo, ezmlm, etc. - I don't know what one murphy is
running). The list manager then counts that against you in its
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:22:41PM +0100, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
| Paul Johnson had the gall to say:
| Derrick 'dman' Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| [snip]
| Almost. murphy generates a bounce and sends it to the list manager
| (mailman, majordomo, ezmlm, etc. - I don't know what one
Evenin' all.
I've installed ClamAV+Exim4 to reject viruses at SMTP time. d-u's
headers don't seem to mention anything about /virus/ scanning (as
opposed to SpamAssassin), so I guess I'm ok asking this question here:
The whole point of having virus scanning while the sender still has an
open
Jonathan Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm fine with (a) - I think that still holds - but is (b) incorrect when
dealing with listmail?
I don't believe so. I do it.
Since the mail has already been received and accepted by murphy, am
I just pushing the sending of spoofed bounce
I have noticed that in all the messages the following header appears:
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Does it mean that the debian list headquarters is using Symantec for
virus scanning, or it is done somewhere down the line?
If the Debian Group is doing it, isnt it ironic
Hello Antonio!
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 06:21:04AM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
I have noticed that in all the messages the following header appears:
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Does it mean that the debian list headquarters is using Symantec for
virus scanning, or it is
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 12:37:31PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
Hello Antonio!
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 06:21:04AM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
I have noticed that in all the messages the following header appears:
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Does it mean that the
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 12:37:31PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
Hello Antonio!
PS: Honoring your Mail-Followup-To...
Im trying to fix this problem. I just wrote `set followup_to=no´
in my .muttrc. I am missreading the manual pages for muttrc?
It says there that it is set to yes by default, so
for muttrc?
It says there that it is set to yes by default, so obviously I have to
invert it. Or it is not the setting to be changed?
thank you 4 ur help.
Perhaps looking at
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.8
will provide further insight into the process on mailing lists
at truffe-perigord-noir.com is request. This list
manager controls all lists.
Next you need to know the name of the list you wish to join or leave. Now
send
a message to the list manager with a command in the body of the message being
join list-name or leave list-name (you can also use
help need good bess bypassing proxys can you help
grade 10 student
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/main Release
Hit http://ftp.fr.debian.org stable/contrib Sources
Hit http://ftp.fr.debian.org stable/contrib Release
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Unable to write mmap - msync (28 No space left on device)
E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
malefoxipal:~# df
PROTECTED]:~]$ sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing zope-translationservice (NewFileVer1)
E: Problem with MergeList
/var/lib/apt/lists/ddtp.debian.org_aptable_dists_es_sid_main_binary-i386_Packages
E: The package lists
...'
Edjunto textual lo que me dice fiel amiga
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing zope-translationservice (NewFileVer1)
E: Problem with MergeList
/var/lib/apt/lists
PROTECTED]:~]$ sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing zope-translationservice (NewFileVer1)
E: Problem with MergeList
/var/lib/apt/lists/ddtp.debian.org_aptable_dists_es_sid_main_binary-i386_Packages
E: The package lists
porfavor...'
Edjunto textual lo que me dice fiel amiga
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing zope-translationservice (NewFileVer1)
E: Problem with MergeList
/var/lib/apt/lists
at truffe-perigord-noir.com is request. This list
manager controls all lists.
Next you need to know the name of the list you wish to join or leave. Now
send
a message to the list manager with a command in the body of the message being
join list-name or leave list-name (you can also use
Thanks to help, I now have my bash script (for copying mail to a web
page) working. Ideally I would do something slightly more complex:
copy mails to a web page, then forward those same mails on to a list
of addresses. So my originjal procmail recipe was:
:0:
* ? $FORMAIL -xFrom: -xSender:
I am looking for a list of commands that are only to debian. I want to
learn debian but it would be nice if there was a list of commands that are
specific to debian and a description of what these commands do. If it
exists, please let me know.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a list of commands that are only to debian. I want to
learn debian but it would be nice if there was a list of commands that are
specific to debian and a description of what these commands do. If it
exists, please let me
-Original Message-
From: Java Training News
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:04 AM
To: Sreelal Chandrasenan
Subject: Sun certifications make top lists!
Dear Sreelal Chandrasenan,
---
You
Lists... Error!
| E: Encountered a section with no Package: header
| E: Problem with MergeList
|
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.freenet.de_pub_debian-openoffice_dists_woody_main_binary-i386_Packages
| E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
`
,[ sources.list
Release
| Reading Package Lists... Error!
| E: Encountered a section with no Package: header
| E: Problem with MergeList
|
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.freenet.de_pub_debian-openoffice_dists_woody_main_binary-i386_Packages
| E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 15:39, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
| Reading Package Lists... Error!
| E: Encountered a section with no Package: header
| E: Problem with MergeList
|
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.freenet.de_pub_debian-openoffice_dists_woody_main_binary-i386_Packages
| E: The package lists
Martin Brauns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heino Tiedemann schrieb:
Hallo,
beim heutigen apt-get update passierte folgendes:
,[ apt-get update ]
| Hit http://backports.org woody/mozilla Packages
[..]
| Hit http://ftp.freenet.de woody/contrib Release
| Reading Package Lists... Error!
| E
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 at 06:49 GMT, ScruLoose penned:
I need to start keeping a list of little tweaks I'm making all over
the system, so I'll be able to roll them out on later installs...
I keep various config files in cvs. Makes it really easy to sync up
accounts on multiple systems. Of
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:10:25AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
Hello 'ScruLoose'!
Howdy, Flo!
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 07:13:31PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
I wonder whether the .muttrc is flexible enough to support something
like looking for known list addresses when you hit r, and giving you
Hello 'ScruLoose'!
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 07:13:31PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
I wonder whether the .muttrc is flexible enough to support something
like looking for known list addresses when you hit r, and giving you
an are you sure? prompt...
Somehow I doubt the .muttrc file is up to that job,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:10:25AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
How about adding
macro index r list-replyreply
macro pager r list-replyreply
to you .muttrc?
It will just act as usual when only a reply seems possible and
automatically do a list-reply otherwise. It even beeps once in this
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:03:35PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:42:09AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier to use mutt's builtin support for mailing lists?
Add the line
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
plus other lists you're on, naturally
'
folder-hook !debian 'bind pager r reply'
This works fine for my mailing lists that are filtered into folders
matching the regular-expression 'debian', however it would be nice to
have it a bit more generic:
message-hook ~l 'bind pager r list-reply'
message-hook !~l 'bind
pager r list-reply'
folder-hook !debian 'bind index r reply'
folder-hook !debian 'bind pager r reply'
This works fine for my mailing lists that are filtered into folders
matching the regular-expression 'debian', however it would be nice to
have it a bit more generic
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:42:09AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier to use mutt's builtin support for mailing lists?
Add the line
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
plus other lists you're on, naturally
somewhere in your .muttrc, and then use L for reply-to-list...
I do use
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:03:35PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
I do use mutt's built-in support for mailing lists. However, like many
people it seems (especially on debian-user); I occasionally hit 'r' to
reply to a list-post rather than L, and I don't have a copy of what I
wrote to post
Hello.
If someone is interested in patch that allows leafnode to act as
bidirectoral mailing lists - newsgroups gateway, please take a look at
http://zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su/leafnode/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 11:04:25PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 02:17:52AM +, Karsten M. Self wrote:
My .muttrc highlights my own posts (bright cyan) in index view, and
notes posts in response to or mentioning my name (easier for me than
at 02:03:05PM -0800, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
| [snip]
|
| Is CC'ing at epidemic levels on debian-user?
|
| I don't find it bad, since the debian- mailing lists are configured
| well. It's rampant on the postgresql- lists, where Reply All and
| Reply To List produce identical results
acceptable. Just pointing out the
possible pitfall.
Instead I target specific lists with this problem and convert them in
a procmail recipe. This is a correction to be applied before any
other mailer gets to it.
Here is an example from the aide list which munges reply-to. YMMV.
# This list
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 11:19:33AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
This has the unfortunate effect that reply-to is just completely
useless. It was made useless when the original list munged it. But
two wrongs do not make a right. Three do. :-)
I thought that was two wrongs don't make a right,
* Bijan Soleymani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031029 07:26]:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:44:52PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:12:28PM -0500, David Gaudine wrote:
With this mail program (the default Mac mail program, which I've not
used much), when I click reply it's your
David Gaudine wrote:
I wouldn't use reply to all, I'd just CC the one person. But indeed, for
those who have to choose between reply and Reply to all and don't want
to adjust things manually, that problem is there.
How would you do that, though? The most common example of CCing the
person
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:03:05PM -0800, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
Monique Y. Herman said on Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:34:25AM -0700:
I put a comment in my sig requesting that I not receive CCs, and I
swear that the number of CCs I received actually increased!
What can I do that will convince
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:57:26 -0800,
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
You have a point. However, I usually make an exception in the case
of newbies becuase they may not receive list messages (because of
Yahoo! or Hotmail spam
lots of newbie posters, and people come
and go often. I run a few small, stable lists (a hundred or so people
each) and even there it's impossible to get people to follow the list
rules. So the idea of trying to convince everyone why my ideas are best
for everyone else, I just deal with in on my own
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 07:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 01:14:15AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:03:05PM -0800, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
[snip]
Is CC'ing at epidemic levels on debian-user?
I don't find it bad, since the debian- mailing lists
-maint|ssh|l10n-english|www|project|glibc|bugs-rc|powerpc
:0:
* $^X-Mailing-List: debian-($DEBLISTS)@lists\\.debian\\.org
* ^X-Mailing-List: debian-\/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian/$MATCH
(I'm not subscribed to quite all of those lists, but I do read most of
them ...)
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
for the harmful camp. I've been to
too many mailing lists with reply-tos, and what you get is a lot of
mis-sent private messages, and then a lot of sorry, didn't mean
that, flame-wars over comments that weren't meant for the list, and
even hell, remove that comment from the list archive. All
.
The extra bandwidth consumed is very small. On the order of 10 extra
emails over the hundreds I already get each day.
Also for some lists (not debian-user yet) I use gmane
where I read and write to the list through a news interface. In that
case it's also nice to get copies of replies to my
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:44:52PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:12:28PM -0500, David Gaudine wrote:
With this mail program (the default Mac mail program, which I've not
used much), when I click reply it's your address that gets used.
I manually changed it in my
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 16:18, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
I like getting CCs. I receive hundreds of mailing list mail a day and
might not be able to check up on all of them every day, but I make
sure to check my main inbox, that way I can see if anybody replied to
anything I said.
Yup, the
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:12:49AM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:36:47PM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
Upon reading this, I have to agree with you -- having a supposedly
private message sent to the list could range from mildly annoying to
outrageously
Bijan Soleymani wrote:
I hit the g key in mutt. It usually does do CCs. I'm told that there is
a header that people can set to request no CCs. I think you mentionned
something along those lines. I am pretty sure mutt respects that. I
think most of the CCs you are receiving are from borken
Bijan Soleymani wrote:
I like getting CCs. I receive hundreds of mailing list mail a day and
might not be able to check up on all of them every day, but I make sure
to check my main inbox, that way I can see if anybody replied to
anything I said.
But how does this translate into being good to
-user?
|
| I don't find it bad, since the debian- mailing lists are configured
| well. It's rampant on the postgresql- lists, where Reply All and
| Reply To List produce identical results.
In that situation, mutt's
set ignore_list_reply_to = yes # fix broken mailing list software
option
* Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-10-29 11:32]:
Bijan Soleymani wrote:
I hit the g key in mutt. It usually does do CCs. I'm told that there is
a header that people can set to request no CCs. I think you mentionned
something along those lines. I am pretty sure mutt respects that. I
think
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 16:18, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
I like getting CCs. I receive hundreds of mailing list mail a day and
might not be able to check up on all of them every day, but I make
sure to check my main inbox, that way I can see if anybody replied to
anything
for the list:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
says When replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send a
carbon copy (CC) to the original poster unless they explicitly request
to be copied.
To use L I have to define the mailing lists I am subscribed to, this
causes
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 07:10:57 +0800
David Palmer. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sylpheed has 'reply to all
sender
mailing list'
option that works for me.
But setting
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as you seem to have done, prevents the
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 07:51:09AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Bijan Soleymani wrote:
I like getting CCs. I receive hundreds of mailing list mail a day and
might not be able to check up on all of them every day, but I make sure
to check my main inbox, that way I can see if anybody replied to
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:36:06PM +, Richard Kimber wrote:
| On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 07:10:57 +0800 David Palmer. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Sylpheed has 'reply to all
|sender
|mailing list'
|
| option that works for me.
|
|
| But
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:00:25PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
| On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:38:45AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
| Shouldn't you be hitting the L key in mutt, for 'reply-to-list' instead
| of g for 'reply-to-all'...
Yes, he should.
| To use L I have to define the mailing lists I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:00:25PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
To use L I have to define the mailing lists I am subscribed to, this
causes mutt to do weird things (I don't remember exactly what, but it
might have shown debian-user as the sender
To use L I have to define the mailing lists I am subscribed to, this
causes mutt to do weird things (I don't remember exactly what, but it
might have shown debian-user as the sender of all messages from
debian-user, instead of the actual senders).
Not for me - the From: header is correct
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 10:35 AM, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
Yup, the way I do this with KMail is to add a filter that checks if my
domain is in the References-header and puts it in a special folder if
it is.
There's an idea. I'll try it. Although personally I'd still rather
receive
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:00:25PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
To use L I have to define the mailing lists I am subscribed to, this
causes mutt to do weird things (I don't remember exactly what, but it
might have shown debian-user as the sender of all messages from
debian-user, instead
:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
says When replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send a
carbon copy (CC) to the original poster unless they explicitly request
to be copied.
To use L I have to define the mailing lists I am subscribed to, this
causes mutt to do
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 01:26:11PM -0500, David Gaudine wrote:
There's an idea. I'll try it. Although personally I'd still rather
receive the message in my debian-user folder and a CC in my inbox. I
suppose I can use a rule to duplicate the message if it's to
debian-user with me as a
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:37:25 -0500
Derrick 'dman' Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If sylpheed can't handle that, then that is a bug and ought to be
fixed.
Well ... my track record on persuading them what is a bug is not good, and
a common response is to be told to go and write the code myself,
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 at 18:26 GMT, David Gaudine penned:
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 10:35 AM, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
There's an idea. I'll try it. Although personally I'd still rather
receive the message in my debian-user folder and a CC in my inbox. I
suppose I can use a rule to
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:18:27 +
Richard Kimber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:37:25 -0500
Derrick 'dman' Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If sylpheed can't handle that, then that is a bug and ought to be
fixed.
Well ... my track record on persuading them what is a
On Wednesday October 29 at 12:36pm
Richard Kimber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 07:10:57 +0800
David Palmer. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sylpheed has 'reply to all
sender
mailing list'
option that works for me.
sometimes gets overwhelmed and posts
don't appear for over an hour, but CC's arrive almost instantaneously.
Hrm. Talk to your local listaholics anonymous yet?
You can accomplish this by setting the Reply-To header of your own
posts. Though some lists will strip and/or rewrite this (considered
Steve Lamb wrote:
Also there are other problems with the CC approach. Take, for
example, a
conversation between 20 people on the same topic (much like this one) all
whacking reply-to-all. Ok, fine, why have the mailing list software at
all?
By the time that 20th person hits reply-to-all
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 02:17:52AM +, Karsten M. Self wrote:
My .muttrc highlights my own posts (bright cyan) in index view, and
notes posts in response to or mentioning my name (easier for me than
some folk) (cyan). So my posts and any replies/references stand out.
O, tell me how!
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 05:15:32PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
| Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
| File a bug report.
|
| Why? I don't see it as a bug.
Richard said he does ...
| Mutt handles this situation correctly, as follows :
| list-reply replies only to the list (because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 02:17:52AM +, Karsten M. Self wrote:
You can accomplish this by setting the Reply-To header of your own
posts. Though some lists will strip and/or rewrite this (considered
harmful, GIYF).
For the people wanting
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:59:06PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
Karsten M. Self wrote:
My .muttrc highlights my own posts (bright cyan) in index view, and
notes posts in response to or mentioning my name (easier for me than
some folk) (cyan). So my posts and any
Paul Johnson wrote:
Karsten M. Self wrote:
You can accomplish this by setting the Reply-To header of your own
posts. Though some lists will strip and/or rewrite this (considered
harmful, GIYF).
For the people wanting to experiment, care to give a muttrc example?
my_hdr Reply
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 11:09:56PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You should be able to do this in a hook too to turn this on and off in
particular lists automatically. WARNING! Untested!
folder-hook
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 02:17:52AM +, Karsten M. Self wrote:
My .muttrc highlights my own posts (bright cyan) in index view, and
notes posts in response to or mentioning my name (easier for me than
some folk) (cyan). So my posts and any replies/references stand out.
Drifting off the
I'm going to attempt to make this a polite question, rather than a rant
or flame ...
For those of you who CC people when responding to the mailing list, why
do you do this? Is there some benefit to doing so of which I'm unaware?
I believe I have the Mail-Followup-To header set on my outgoing
On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 01:34 PM, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
I believe I have the Mail-Followup-To header set on my outgoing
messages, which should be a clue for some readers. (I was told that
gmane would translate Mail-Copies-To to Mail-Followup-To
automagically.)
With this mail
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 at 19:12 GMT, David Gaudine penned:
On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 01:34 PM, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
I believe I have the Mail-Followup-To header set on my outgoing
messages, which should be a clue for some readers. (I was told that
gmane would translate
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 20:30, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
[...]
Hrm.. Does debian-user not set the reply-to to the list, or is this my
[...]
Apparently not. I wonder why not. It would surely be a good idea - for
those using simpler mail clients. I use kmail and filter lists direct
clients. I use kmail and filter lists direct to
their own folders, where I set the reply-to-list address to try to prevent
myself making mistakes...
À propos, I've been thinking of giving mutt a try: can it do that too?
I don't think I could cope with the volume of mail without mutt ;) You
set
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:34:25AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
I'm going to attempt to make this a polite question, rather than a rant
or flame ...
For those of you who CC people when responding to the mailing list, why
do you do this? Is there some benefit to doing so of which I'm
801 - 900 of 1366 matches
Mail list logo
