clients. I use kmail and filter lists direct to
their own folders, where I set the reply-to-list address to try to prevent
myself making mistakes...
À propos, I've been thinking of giving mutt a try: can it do that too?
I don't think I could cope with the volume of mail without mutt ;) You
set
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:34:25AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
I'm going to attempt to make this a polite question, rather than a rant
or flame ...
For those of you who CC people when responding to the mailing list, why
do you do this? Is there some benefit to doing so of which I'm
the debian-user addy too.
I am on other lists, and 'reply' will use the list address for them.
Those messages have, among others, the following headers set to the posting
address for that list.
Resent-From:
X-Mailing-List:
X-Loop:
Reply-To:
List-Post:
I do not know which makes outlook work
Monique Y. Herman said on Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:34:25AM -0700:
I'm going to attempt to make this a polite question, rather than a rant
or flame ...
Huzzah! Polite questions are gold.
For those of you who CC people when responding to the mailing list, why
do you do this? Is there some
lists direct to
their own folders, where I set the reply-to-list address to try to prevent
myself making mistakes...
À propos, I've been thinking of giving mutt a try: can it do that too?
yes, you can set up a list of list email addresses and then hit
(IIRC) L to reply to the list
erik
simpler mail clients.
If the tool doesn't work, get one that does. It's not like options
aren't available or are overpriced.
| I use kmail and filter lists direct to
| their own folders, where I set the reply-to-list address to try to prevent
| myself making mistakes...
|
| À propos, I've been
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 22:37, Richard Lyons wrote:
Apparently not. I wonder why not. It would surely be a good idea -
for those using simpler mail clients. I use kmail and filter lists
direct to their own folders, where I set the reply-to-list address to
try to prevent myself making
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 at 22:18 GMT, Kjetil Kjernsmo penned:
I can't agree. For a review of the opposing viewpoints, see
http://marc.merlins.org/perso/listreplyto.html I've been in both
camps, but I have now settled for the harmful camp. I've been to
too many mailing lists with reply-tos
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 at 22:03 GMT, Mark Ferlatte penned:
[snip]
Most of the people who have this problem, I believe, have the
technical abi= lity to setup such a filter, and for reasons that I
don't understand choose not = to do so and instead depend upon the
charity of the mailing list
- for
those using simpler mail clients. I use kmail and filter lists direct to
their own folders, where I set the reply-to-list address to try to prevent
myself making mistakes...
À propos, I've been thinking of giving mutt a try: can it do that too?
And another thing: all those
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:34:25AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
I'm going to attempt to make this a polite question, rather than a rant
or flame ...
For those of you who CC people when responding to the mailing list, why
do you do this? Is there some benefit to doing so of which I'm
Monique Y. Herman said on Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:41:56PM -0700:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 at 22:03 GMT, Mark Ferlatte penned:
[snip]
Most of the people who have this problem, I believe, have the
technical abi= lity to setup such a filter, and for reasons that I
don't understand choose not =
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:36:47PM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
| But then I have to ask -- do some clients automagically CC the poster,
| or are people going to the trouble of CCing manually?
I forget who already mentioned it this time around, but it is
automatic. Some mail clients aren't
not. I wonder why not. It would surely be a good
idea - for those using simpler mail clients. I use kmail and filter
lists direct to their own folders, where I set the reply-to-list
address to try to prevent myself making mistakes...
À propos, I've been thinking of giving mutt a try: can
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 at 23:19 GMT, Bill Moseley penned:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:34:25AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
I'm going to attempt to make this a polite question, rather than a
rant or flame ...
For those of you who CC people when responding to the mailing list,
why do you do
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 at 23:38 GMT, Mark Ferlatte penned:
=20 Whoa. Where did all of those `=3D' chars come from?
Dunno. I see them on some of the messages I receive. And then again
just now in the text you quoted.
Something about slrn not handling quoted-printable multi-part messages
Bill Moseley wrote:
I cc, but luckily my mailer mutt understands what you want. That's good
because I can't keep track of what the hundreds (thousands?) of people on this
list wish, and not all of them have smart mailers to set the
Mail-Followup-To header.
You don't have to, the onus is on
Mark Ferlatte wrote:
Most of the people who have this problem, I believe, have the technical ability
to setup such a filter, and for reasons that I don't understand choose not to
do so and instead depend upon the charity of the mailing list posters to cater
to their reply whims. This, to me,
Monique Y. Herman wrote:
For those of you who CC people when responding to the mailing list, why
do you do this? Is there some benefit to doing so of which I'm unaware?
None. They just like breaking the CoC for these mailing lists.
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct item #9
- Original Message -
From: Monique Y. Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 13:30
Subject: Re: netiquette: CCing on lists
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 at 19:12 GMT, David Gaudine penned:
On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 01:34 PM, Monique Y. Herman
Monique Y. Herman said on Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 05:00:29PM -0700:
Something about slrn not handling quoted-printable multi-part messages
properly, I believe. I don't know the meaning of what I just said, but
that's what I've been told. I guess I could write a vim script to clean
it up on
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:51:14PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
You don't have to, the onus is on them to ask, explicitly, in the body
of the message that they want a CC. If they don't ask and you don't send
that is their problem. But sending a CC unasked you're causing unasked
work
kind of annoyance that spam was, what, 7 years ago? Oh, just hit delete
every now and again... Rude is rude.
The other part is, like it or not, on these lists it is also a matter of
accepted conduct codified on the web page people should read before
subscribing. So those who do find it rude
Steve Lamb wrote:
Mark Ferlatte wrote:
Most of the people who have this problem, I believe, have the
technical ability
to setup such a filter, and for reasons that I don't understand choose
not to
do so and instead depend upon the charity of the mailing list posters
to cater
to their reply
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
You have a point. However, I usually make an exception in the case of
newbies becuase they may not receive list messages (because of Yahoo! or
Hotmail spam filtering for such accounts). I know I had this problem
when I first subscribed to the list. But otherwise, I tend
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 17:10, David Palmer. wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 22:37:49 +0100
Richard Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 20:30, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
[...]
Hrm.. Does debian-user not set the reply-to to the list, or is this my
[...]
[snip]
--
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:28:12 -0600
Ron Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 17:10, David Palmer. wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 22:37:49 +0100
Richard Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 20:30, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
[...]
Hrm.. Does debian-user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:12:28PM -0500, David Gaudine wrote:
With this mail program (the default Mac mail program, which I've not
used much), when I click reply it's your address that gets used.
I manually changed it in my earlier followup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:37:49PM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
And another thing: all those spamassassin headers are resent to the list.
Seems a waste of bandwidth...
Murphy is running spamassassin, IIRC.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 05:12:42PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
mutt is _very_ powerful; at this point I use enough of its advanced
features and have enough keystrokes ingrained in my fingers that I
can't really handle mail (certainly not
function. In those mail
clients, the user only has the choice of reply or reply-to-all.
These are considered harmful for use on mailing lists. File a bug.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin and user
`- Debian - when you have better things to do
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:34:50AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
Bairestrade:
Someone is apparently subscribing one or more mailing lists at
@lists.debian.org to your mailing lists. These relate to a
computer-related project, the Debian GNU/Linux distribution, which has
no interest in your
Bairestrade:
Someone is apparently subscribing one or more mailing lists at
@lists.debian.org to your mailing lists. These relate to a
computer-related project, the Debian GNU/Linux distribution, which has
no interest in your mailing lists.
This has been reported to several spam reporting
Actualitzant la llista de paquets disponible amb el dselect... va fent
tota la baixada dels llistats actualitzats però al final em surt aquest
missatge d'error:
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing selfhtml (NewPackage)
E: Problem
Gràcies per la ràpida resposta.
has d'afegir la seguent linia a
/etc/apt/apt.conf
APT::Cache-Limit 1000;
(o un numero similarment gran).
Mmmm no tinc un /etc/apt/apt.conf a /etc/apt/ només hi ha el
sources.list i un subdirectori /etc/apt/apt.conf.d on s'hi troba un
70debconf que
echo APT::Cache-Limit 1000 /etc/apt/apt.conf
Ja està resolt. Faltava un punt i coma al final, però ja ho he deduït
per l'anterior instrucció. Quedem llavors en que
echo APT::Cache-Limit 1000; /etc/apt/apt.conf
Moltes gràcies.
Quim
Dear everyone,
I have used the debian mailing lists using yahoo mail services as the email account receiving the mails for several months. However, a fewer weeks ago, I cannot receive any mails from debian-user mailing lists. I do not know why this happen, but i have not accidentially set
the list several times.So you're not the only one this happens to.
Maybe someone will look into what's really happening?
Quoting Yuen Sum Ng [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dear everyone,
I have used the debian mailing lists using yahoo mail services as the
email account receiving the mails for several
Kim
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men. ~Willy
Wonka
There's a little witch in all of us - Practical Magic
I'm not a Bad Witch, I'm a Grumpy Witch
attachment: winmail.dat
I was surprised to find that some debian lists require a subscription
to post, but have no nomail option.
This means e.g. gmane.org users will get a copy of each message, even
though they've already read them.
For modem users, for the privilege of posting one message, one must
get one's POP box
Dan Jacobson wrote:
I was surprised to find that some debian lists require a subscription
to post, but have no nomail option.
Umm, which debian lists require a subscription in order to post?
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Travis Crump wrote:
Dan Jacobson wrote:
I was surprised to find that some debian lists require a subscription
to post, but have no nomail option.
Umm, which debian lists require a subscription in order to post?
never mind, I figured it out(some==2, debian-chinese-(big5|gb) and
debian-ctte, both
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 07:17:47AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
This means e.g. gmane.org users will get a copy of each message, even
though they've already read them.
No, it doesn't. Try thinking about what it means when the web page says
This list is not moderated, posting is allowed to
My web hosting service lost the aliases file, and mail was bounced back
to senders for user unknown.
It is fixed now; but, I am unclear on mailing list response to this
situation? Will the bounced messages be re-sent? Are they lost
forever?
What do you think?
--
Best Regards,
mds
mds
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 04:53:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Thanks Derrick, your directions were a great help.
|
| The weirdest thing is that Netscape seems to tell IMAP daemon
| where folders are, I think.
Yes, that's the way the IMAP protocol is defined.
| I only entered the IMAP
Thanks Derrick, your directions were a great help.
The weirdest thing is that Netscape seems to tell IMAP daemon
where folders are, I think.
I only entered the IMAP directory in Netscape and then
the IMAP daemon somehow picked this up and started serving the files
that I had placed in that
on Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 06:31:36PM +0200, Dennis Stosberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
J?rgen A.Erhard wrote:
What I'm looking for is a way to tell a mail filtering tool how to
automatically sort mails from mailing lists.
Just two days ago Sascha Andres has announced on [EMAIL PROTECTED
Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 06:31:36PM +0200, Dennis Stosberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
J?rgen A.Erhard wrote:
What I'm looking for is a way to tell a mail filtering tool how to
automatically sort mails from mailing lists.
Just two days ago Sascha Andres has
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 06:19:36PM -0700, J F wrote:
| root:/var/log# pwd
| /var/log
| root:/var/log# egrep imap daemon.log
| ...
| Jun 16 17:49:23 a1700xp imapd[978]: connect from a1700xp.ebeb.com
| Jun 16 17:49:23 a1700xp imapd[978]: error: cannot execute /usr/sbin/imapd:
| No such file or
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:01:38PM -0700, J F wrote:
| It even responds sort of:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc# telnet 10.0.0.9 143
| Trying 10.0.0.9...
| Connected to 10.0.0.9.
| Escape character is '^]'.
| ((It pauses a few seconds and then))
| Connection closed by foreign host.
Apparently
root:/var/log# pwd
/var/log
root:/var/log# egrep imap daemon.log
...
Jun 16 17:49:23 a1700xp imapd[978]: connect from a1700xp.ebeb.com
Jun 16 17:49:23 a1700xp imapd[978]: error: cannot execute /usr/sbin/imapd: No such
file or directory
root:/var/log#apt-get update
root:/var/log#
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 08:22:37AM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 05:58:50PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
Try this to identify all the Debian mailing lists in one whack:
# Debian lists ...
:0:
* ^X-Mailing-List: .*[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
* ^X-Mailing-List
Mail lists lots of headers but mozilla does not see any imap mail.
~$ mail
Mail version 8.1.2 01/15/2001. Type ? for help.
/var/mail/jf: 118 messages 118 new
N 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 14 11:52 192/12701 Time Sensitive Information Regarding your
ATTBI E-mail Account
...
I can see imap
hard disk install.
Thanks in advance,
J F
J F wrote:
Mail lists lots of headers but mozilla does not see any imap mail.
~$ mail
Mail version 8.1.2 01/15/2001. Type ? for help.
/var/mail/jf: 118 messages 118 new
N 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 14 11:52 192/12701 Time Sensitive
Information Regarding
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:21:08PM +0100, Hugh Saunders wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:40:17PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:41:37AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Or maybe it's easier to just lobby the various MLM authors to add
List-Id? If so, where could I
Jürgen A.Erhard wrote:
What I'm looking for is a way to tell a mail filtering tool how to
automatically sort mails from mailing lists.
Just two days ago Sascha Andres has announced on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that he started to host a list of procmail recipes for mailing
lists. At the moment
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:37:58PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
So they do... The other List headers are included. Oh well...
Try this to identify all the Debian mailing lists in one whack:
# Debian lists ...
:0:
* ^X-Mailing-List: .*[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
* ^X-Mailing-List: .*[] *\/[^ [EMAIL
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 05:58:50PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:37:58PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
So they do... The other List headers are included. Oh well...
Try this to identify all the Debian mailing lists in one whack:
# Debian lists ...
:0:
* ^X-Mailing
Hi list.
[Please CC: me on list replies, I'm too far behind in ML traffic.
Thank you.]
I've googled every which way I can, but I didn't find it. It being
a list of identifying markers for various mailing lists.
What I'm looking for is a way to tell a mail filtering tool how to
automatically
already have
wishlist bugs to support RFC2919, but if you find any that don't it's
probably a good idea to file one.
btw, I filter debian lists via X-Mailing-List: .
good times,
Vineet
--
http://www.doorstop.net/
--
Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 09:43:59PM +0200, J?rgen A.Erhard wrote:
What I'm looking for is a way to tell a mail filtering tool how to
automatically sort mails from mailing lists.
I use, in order of preference, the List-id, X-Mailing-List
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:41:37AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Or maybe it's easier to just lobby the various MLM authors to add
List-Id? If so, where could I find a list of MLMs and their
respective authors?
When you find a list that doesn't, point out the RFC and ask the list
operator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:40:17PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
Er... is debian-user using List-Id? I don't seem to be able to locate it
in the headers... Might be my eyes, of course, ;-)
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=78237
They
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:40:17PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:41:37AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Or maybe it's easier to just lobby the various MLM authors to add
List-Id? If so, where could I find a list of MLMs and their
respective authors?
When you
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 10:04:32AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Not a doc bug -- that part of the documentation is immediately
created from the relevant program code. But, of course, the Debian
package may unset use_domain in the systemwide configuration file
/etc/Muttrc.
That's exactly
On 2003-05-25 13:23:32 -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
I'm trying to figure this out myself. In particular, it looks
like there might be a bug in either the documentation or (I hope)
mutt 1.4. The documentation says that the ~l pattern matches
messages to known lists (anything matched
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:39:13PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
The logic for the mail-followup-to header is a little more
complicated, and involves both subscribed and known lists.
First of all, mutt will only generate a mail-followup-to header if
(1) the $followup_to option is set
On a related note: I noticed that my reply had:
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian users list [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mutt users list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is not my address.
I didn't have $hostname set in my .muttrc so I assume it set the
Mail-Followup-To:
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 01:40:51PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
On a related note: I noticed that my reply had:
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian users list [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mutt users list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is not my address.
I didn't have
* Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-29-03 18:36]:
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:39:13PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
The logic for the mail-followup-to header is a little more
complicated, and involves both subscribed and known lists.
First of all, mutt will only generate a mail
On 2003-05-29 14:24:38 -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
And to follow up to my own post. Mutt 1.5.4i (2003-03-19) does
not set $use_domain yes by default. The docs say:
use_domain
Type: boolean
Default: yes
When set, Mutt will qualify all local addresses (ones without the @host
portion)
Manuel Beetz schrieb:
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
APT::Cache-Limit 141943904;
Was für wahnwitzige Werte geistern da eigentlich durch die Gegend?
Ich habe das von den vorherigen 4 auf 8 MiB (= 8388608) erhöht und
vermutlich reicht das noch für Jahre, bis mal wieder mehr nötig wird.
--
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:20:03 -0300, Gilberto Villani Brito wrote:
Ola lista que msg e essa???
Eu nunca fiz isso de mandar varios e-mails.
A reclamacão não é de que você tenha mandado muitas
mensagens, mas que teu servidor rejeitou muitas mensagens.
Se continuar a ter
Ola lista que msg e essa???
Eu nunca fiz isso de mandar varios e-mails.
Abracos
Gilberto
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 04:30:52 -0500 (CDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (SmartList)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: You have been removed from the following lists
Your mail address
Quoted by a bunch of ninja agents
For `Gilberto Villani Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
On Wednesday, 23 April 2003 (22:20):
Ola lista que msg e essa???
Eu nunca fiz isso de mandar varios e-mails.
Talvez você não, mas o servidor que hospeda seus emails, sim. Ou sua
caixa
postal estava
can someone please tell me why this is happening?
apt-get update;
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing courier-ssl (NewVersion1)
E: Problem with MergeList
/var/lib/apt/lists
Joel Alexandre wrote:
can someone please tell me why this is happening?
apt-get update;
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing courier-ssl (NewVersion1)
E: Problem with MergeList
/var/lib/apt
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:37:35PM -0800, Xavian-Anderson Macpherson wrote:
Your mail address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], has been removed
from the following mailing lists, because it generated an
exessive number of bounced mails:
bounced messages are normally not generated by mail clients like Kmail
Your mail address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], has been removed
from the following mailing lists, because it generated an
exessive number of bounced mails:
Someone else mention the same thing to me before, but I have no idea
what is causing it or how to fix it. I have no idea what I may have
done
site gmane http://gmane.org/, ciente dessas questões propicia um
serviço gratuito de gateway que permite a leitura /e/ postagem para as
mailing-lists via news /com propagação para mailing-lists/.
Isso significa que você não precisa mais /assinar/ mailing-lists e
receber aquele tráfego maciço em sua
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Iain.) writes:
I'm finding that INN is returning empty replies to requests for lists
in /var/lib/news/, like active and newsgroups. It does however list
stuff in /etc/news like overview.fmt and motd.
No takers?
Oh well - I'll have to purge it and try installing it from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Iain.) writes:
Looking in /var/lib/news/, I can see that the files are populated as
I'd expect. I've used ctlinnd to newgroup groups, but nothing more
appears from INN.
I should mention that GROUP also fails with a 441 No such group. I've
rebuilt the history and overview
I've upgraded my news server to Woody (I know - I was on holiday and
busy and things...) following the blurb in
/usr/share/doc/inn2/NEWS.gz.
I'm finding that INN is returning empty replies to requests for lists
in /var/lib/news/, like active and newsgroups. It does however list
stuff in /etc
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 06:47, Josh Rehman wrote:
I agree with Jerry. Consider that as a new user of this list, I began
with a post asking about ext3. I found the responses to be overall very
helpful, although at first rather terse. Encouraged, I responded to a
Terseness is not always bad. I
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 19:25, Jamin W.Collins wrote:
On 01 Oct 2002 18:23:40 +0100 Peter Whysall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Terseness is not always bad. I always try to respond to a politely
asked, well-structured question in kind; I personally think that people
who post only links to
Oh, man, I thought this thread was dead...
On 0, Peter Whysall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
thread about the structure of the list itself, namely the use of
reply-to headers. Instead of responding materially to my points, one
poster, for example, made mention of my use of Outlook as a
I've found two things on the spamassassin package that I am unable
to determine how to configure or manage.
(My setup is postfix|procmail|spamassassin)
spamd.conf:
There is, on one machine, a line DROPPRIVS=yes. But it doesn't
show up anywhere else.
What is this line used for? What does it
in doing so. Also, if you're not on a permanent
connection, I'm sure there are bandwidth issues as well.
I agree that the point he made is somewhat valid.
I am subscribed to a couple of other lists as well. Should fetchmail
for one reason or another not work for a couple of days, I am sure I
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 06:35, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
I have been on this list for about 5 years, and I don't think I have ever
seen one instance of Fuck Off. I have heard many people advise others to
go away, but never actually as blunt or blatant as that.
Wlll, there's certainly
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:47:38AM +1000, David Pastern wrote:
You guys are goddamn rude. If this is linux helpfulness at it's best god
help linux and open source. To quote three dead trolls in a baggie' every
os sucks.mp3:
Yep, some are, some are not. I don't want to get philosophical and
can't deal with email lists; we don't do things his way.
Too fucking bad.
You're funny, man. But from one Bob to another, please use smilies
or you run the risk of being misunderstood.
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On 0, Josh Rehman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jerry Gaiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
This is the third time I've subscribed to debian-user. Each time I
leave
in disgust because of the attitude of a few posters. Debian is *not*
the
easiest distribution to install, but some of you
On Monday 09 September 2002 10:42 pm, Barney Wrightson wrote:
David Pastern wrote:
Snip
10. Remember that english is not everyones main tongue. Writing skills
are always weaker for a person from a NESB (non english speaking
background).
Best wishes,
Dave W Pastern
On the
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 08:43:06 -0400
Edward Guldemond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd recently bought (yes paid money) for Suse 8 pro. I decided to
trial it on my laptop, Compaq Armada 1750. Eventually, I got it to
work and install. After contacting Suse support that is.
Installation
.
For that matter I wasn't knocking the debian system, I was having a go at a
few users who were plain downright rude. And at the general elitism that
i've personally found from a large % of linux users elsewhere (and that
appeared to initially be the case on the debian lists here).
Thankfully most
distribution. After
playing with it for a week and a half (and learning a reasonable amount in
that time frame) i've managed to get it working. And i'm happy. I don't
have a problem with Debian mailing lists/help. I do have a problem with
people like those that I replied to in my original post
Amen. Good points Matthias.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Szupryczynski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 11 September 2002 12:22 AM
To: Debian User; David Pastern
Subject: [STOP THIS] Why mailing-lists? Usenet have been invented, I
hear.;-)
He list,
just
- Why on earth (to stay local) doesn't Debian move the lists to a
- newsserver instead That way it's much easier to follow threads and
- only download the messages that is of interest. And if Debian does not
- connect to other newsservers, they will not get obnoxious groups as
- alt.sex
be a better medium than a mailing list for this. I would suggest that
among the vast majority of computer users, both mailing lists and Usenet
are something of an unknown, and the same would apply to IRC - if it
isn't the web or usual person-to-person email, it is a Wuzzat? type of
black cyber-magic
make you less stupid; it just makes you stupid faster.
Jerry Gregoire - Former CIO at Dell
-Original Message-
From: Colin Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why mailing-lists? Usenet have been invented, I hear
901 - 1000 of 1368 matches
Mail list logo
