lp0 on fire - Epson Stylus Color 480 with Woody and Knoppix and CUPS

2004-03-04 Thread Geoff Thurman
Hello folks. My logs are showing lp0 to be on fire. This is an Epson Stylus Color 480. It behaved oddly last time I printed something - a few weeks back. It was a fairly large print job, which it refused to touch only to print the lot out the next time I booted. Thereafter it refused to print

Re: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-07 Thread Mark L. Kahnt
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 13:04, Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote: > On Thursday 06 March 2003 23:16, Mark L. Kahnt wrote: > > And if there is lots of heat, light and smoke, get the fire extinguisher > > - it is not *totally* impossible for printers to catch fire. > > Old, very fast line printers could catch f

Re: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-07 Thread Christian Kaenzig
On Thursday 06 March 2003 20:57, Carla Schroder wrote: > A Google search for lp0 on fire turns up several hits: > http://216.239.37.100/search?q=cache:bcjVD8F2zJUC:www.kalamazoolinux.org/ma >ilarchive/0006/msg00188.html+lp0+on+fire&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 Apparently this is > an ol

Re: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-07 Thread Svenn Are Bjerkem
On Thursday 06 March 2003 23:16, Mark L. Kahnt wrote: > And if there is lots of heat, light and smoke, get the fire extinguisher > - it is not *totally* impossible for printers to catch fire. Old, very fast line printers could catch fire if the paper jamed while the printer still wanted to spit o

Re: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-07 Thread Carla Schroder
On Thursday 06 March 2003 11:02 pm, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:20:09PM +1100, John Griffiths wrote: > > >Yes, you are using a retarded email client and inserting this huge > > >disclaimer bullshit which is all one one line. > > > > > >You asked for that one :-) > > > > Wow, > > >

Re: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-07 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:06:04PM +, Shri Shrikumar wrote: > Mar 6 14:24:35 server kernel: lp0 on fire > > What does this mean - I can confirm that there is no actual fire as of > yet but it does have me worried - any thoughts ? You just became the umpteenth victim of an ex

Re: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-07 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:20:09PM +1100, John Griffiths wrote: > > > > > >Yes, you are using a retarded email client and inserting this huge > >disclaimer bullshit which is all one one line. > > > >You asked for that one :-) > > > > Wow, > > you're in a charming mood today dude. Well, it's not

Re: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-06 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:20:09PM +1100, John Griffiths wrote: > > > > > >Yes, you are using a retarded email client and inserting this huge > >disclaimer bullshit which is all one one line. > > > >You asked for that one :-) > > > > Wow, > > you're in a charming mood today dude. I see your mail

Re: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-06 Thread John Griffiths
Yes, you are using a retarded email client and inserting this huge disclaimer bullshit which is all one one line. You asked for that one :-) Wow, you're in a charming mood today dude. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-06 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 05:10:13PM -0500, Narins, Josh wrote: > > Quoting Shri Shrikumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I got this very interesting logcheck email with this line > > > > > > Mar 6 14:24:35 server ker

Re: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-06 Thread Hugh Saunders
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 05:10:13PM -0500, Narins, Josh wrote: > I set my printer ablaze, and did not get this message. > > Am I doing something wrong? yes: arson hugh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-06 Thread Shri Shrikumar
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 22:10, Narins, Josh wrote: > > Quoting Shri Shrikumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I got this very interesting logcheck email with this line > > > > > > Mar 6 14:24:35 server kernel: lp0 on fire &g

Re: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-06 Thread Mark L. Kahnt
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 15:05, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: > Quoting Shri Shrikumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi All, > > > > I got this very interesting logcheck email with this line > > > > Mar 6 14:24:35 server kernel: lp0 on fire > > > > W

RE: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-06 Thread Narins, Josh
> Quoting Shri Shrikumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi All, > > > > I got this very interesting logcheck email with this line > > > > Mar 6 14:24:35 server kernel: lp0 on fire > > > > What does this mean - I can confirm that there is no actua

Re: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-06 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
Quoting Shri Shrikumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi All, > > I got this very interesting logcheck email with this line > > Mar 6 14:24:35 server kernel: lp0 on fire > > What does this mean - I can confirm that there is no actual fire as of > yet but it does

Re: kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-06 Thread Carla Schroder
On Thursday 06 March 2003 11:06 am, Shri Shrikumar wrote: > Hi All, > > I got this very interesting logcheck email with this line > > Mar 6 14:24:35 server kernel: lp0 on fire > > What does this mean - I can confirm that there is no actual fire as of > yet but it do

kernel: lp0 on fire ????

2003-03-06 Thread Shri Shrikumar
Hi All, I got this very interesting logcheck email with this line Mar 6 14:24:35 server kernel: lp0 on fire What does this mean - I can confirm that there is no actual fire as of yet but it does have me worried - any thoughts ? Shri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: lp0 on fire

2001-06-16 Thread John R Lenton
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 10:41:07AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Do let the FAQ maintainer know, then. According to the feedback section, > his address is Robert Kiesling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. I'll wait for 2.4.7 :/ -- John Lenton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Random fortune: It is through symbols that m

Re: lp0 on fire

2001-06-16 Thread Colin Watson
John R Lenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 05:13:13PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >>In newer kernels this message reads lp1 reported invalid error status >>(on fire, eh?). > >that should read 'older newer kernels' or something. It means >2.2.x. (in 2.4.x people returne

Re: lp0 on fire

2001-06-16 Thread John R Lenton
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 05:13:13PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >In newer kernels this message reads lp1 reported invalid error status >(on fire, eh?). that should read 'older newer kernels' or something. It means 2.2.x. (in 2.4.x people returned to sanity and put it back) -- John Lenton (

Re: lp0 on fire

2001-06-16 Thread Colin Watson
David Raeker-Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I was printing a rather large label job from a local debian machine to a >remote debian machine that has an old dot matrix printer attached to it. >After about 10 minutes of printing to the remote printer, the message "lp0 >on

Re: lp0 on fire

2001-06-15 Thread Paul Wright
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:51:57 EDT, David wrote: > I was printing a rather large label job from a local debian machine to a > remote debian machine that has an old dot matrix printer attached to it. > After about 10 minutes of printing to the remote printer, the message "lp0 > on f

Re: lp0 on fire

2001-06-15 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
* David Raeker-Jordan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: > I was printing a rather large label job from a local debian machine to a > remote debian machine that has an old dot matrix printer attached to it. > After about 10 minutes of printing to the remote printer, the message "

lp0 on fire

2001-06-15 Thread David Raeker-Jordan
I was printing a rather large label job from a local debian machine to a remote debian machine that has an old dot matrix printer attached to it. After about 10 minutes of printing to the remote printer, the message "lp0 on fire" popped up on the remote machine's terminal and the