On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 09:19:39AM -0600, Jeff Hahn wrote:
From: Rob Weir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I haven't used it, but judging from the package description, 'no'.
That's the conclusion I came to as well. I don't see anything in
particular using the lightweight resolver, but if
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:43:01AM -0600, Jeff Hahn wrote:
I need to run named (this 'puter is secondary for a few zones)
Do I still need to run lwresd?
Or do I enable the lwresd functionality in named conf?
I don't have a clue what libraries or applications use the lightweight
From: Rob Weir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I haven't used it, but judging from the package description, 'no'.
That's the conclusion I came to as well. I don't see anything in
particular using the lightweight resolver, but if it wants to, I added:
lwres { };
to the
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Jeff Hahn wrote:
I need to run named (this 'puter is secondary for a few zones)
Do I still need to run lwresd?
Not if you have bind9 installed. lwresd appears (from its description)
to be a stripped down version of bind9. Also, bind9 depends on
liblwres1, so we can infer
I need to run named (this 'puter is secondary for a few zones)
Do I still need to run lwresd?
Or do I enable the lwresd functionality in named conf?
I don't have a clue what libraries or applications use the lightweight
resolver libraries...
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
-Jeff
--
5 matches
Mail list logo
