Re: lyx 0.12 final in hamm is actually bo ?

1998-02-28 Thread Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
> I'm running a lyx_0.12.0.final-0.1.deb from hamm tree and this one is libc6 > dependant: > Which means the hamm tree is the right place for it... yes, but mark it with an = in deselect to hold it, so it doesn't get replaced with the bo version mentioned, which requires obsolete xforms packag

Re: lyx 0.12 final in hamm is actually bo ?

1998-02-28 Thread Damir J. Naden
Hi Oleg Krivosheev; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote: > Hi, > > looks like lyx 0.12 binal bo version > live now in hamm tree. > > Is it known probelm ? > > regards I'm running a lyx_0.12.0.final-0.1.deb from hamm tree and this one is libc6 dependant: ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/lyx libforms.

lyx 0.12 final in hamm is actually bo ?

1998-02-27 Thread Oleg Krivosheev
Hi, looks like lyx 0.12 binal bo version live now in hamm tree. Is it known probelm ? regards OK -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .