On 2017-07-08 03:24 -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 04:39:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Argh, I am sorry. I meant to say just the opposite by leaving out the
>> extra "not", In fact, various packages have been demoted from Priority
>> standard or important to optional
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 04:39:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Argh, I am sorry. I meant to say just the opposite by leaving out the
> extra "not", In fact, various packages have been demoted from Priority
> standard or important to optional in recent years. This includes the
> venerable "ed"
On 2017-07-07 16:52 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 07/07/17 à 16:39, Sven Joachim a écrit :
>> In fact, various packages have been demoted from Priority
>> standard or important to optional in recent years. This includes the
>> venerable "ed" text editor for instance, and also any package
Le 07/07/17 à 16:39, Sven Joachim a écrit :
> On 2017-07-07 05:19 -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:41:33AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>> On 2017-07-07 02:06 -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
What was the reason for omitting mailutils (and, specifically, a
On 2017-07-07 05:19 -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:41:33AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2017-07-07 02:06 -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
>> > What was the reason for omitting mailutils (and, specifically, a
>> > functional /usr/bin/mail binary) from the default strech
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 05:19:45AM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:41:33AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > There are certainly reasons for that, and I don't think many people
> > use /usr/bin/mail to send or read mail these days.
Huh? I think plenty of locally written
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:41:33AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2017-07-07 02:06 -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > What was the reason for omitting mailutils (and, specifically, a
> > functional /usr/bin/mail binary) from the default strech install?
>
> For the record, mailutils have never been
On 2017-07-07 02:06 -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> What was the reason for omitting mailutils (and, specifically, a
> functional /usr/bin/mail binary) from the default strech install?
For the record, mailutils have never been part of a default install, but
bsd-mailx (which also provides
What was the reason for omitting mailutils (and, specifically, a
functional /usr/bin/mail binary) from the default strech install?
That's kind of a standard thing to be there on *nix systems...
(Yes, I've just spent the last couple days wondering why a couple new
stretch servers I set up were
9 matches
Mail list logo
