Re: [Ignor Whois] Re: make-kpgk -- recompile without clean?

2004-04-21 Thread Brian Brazil
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 06:54:13AM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 12:17:43PM +0100, Brian Brazil wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 05:38:56PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote: > > > I built a kernel image and I forgot to enable one setting (console > > > framebuffer). > > > > > > I

Re: [Ignor Whois] Re: make-kpgk -- recompile without clean?

2004-04-20 Thread Bill Moseley
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 12:17:43PM +0100, Brian Brazil wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 05:38:56PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote: > > I built a kernel image and I forgot to enable one setting (console > > framebuffer). > > > > Is it possible to recompile without running clean first? > > It should c

Re: make-kpgk -- recompile without clean?

2004-04-20 Thread Brian Brazil
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 05:38:56PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote: > I built a kernel image and I forgot to enable one setting (console > framebuffer). > > Is it possible to recompile without running clean first? It should complain. Not a good idea to do this anyway. If you must do this search back

make-kpgk -- recompile without clean?

2004-04-19 Thread Bill Moseley
I built a kernel image and I forgot to enable one setting (console framebuffer). Is it possible to recompile without running clean first? -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]