I made a custom kernel:
make kpkg --revision=.custom.10 --append-to-version=.cybo.1 --initrd
kernel_image
this issued in: linux-image-2.6.25.cybo.1_custom.1.0_amd64.deb
I installed this and wanted to make nvidia modules for it:
make-kpkg modules_image
This issued an error: (para phrased
Hallo Leute,
ich versuche module zu backen und bekomme diese Meldung.
make-kpkg modules_image
exec debian/rules DEBIAN_REVISION=2.6.16-10.00.Custom modules_image
echo The UTS Release version in include/linux/version.h; echo
\2.6.16-2-k7\ ; echo does not match current version:; echo
\2.6.16
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:51:13 +0200 Dirk Schleicher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make-kpkg modules_image
exec debian/rules DEBIAN_REVISION=2.6.16-10.00.Custom modules_image
echo The UTS Release version in include/linux/version.h; echo
\2.6.16-2-k7\ ; echo does not match current version:; echo
Am Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:24:50 +0200
schrieb Evgeni Golov:
Hallo,
make-kpkg --append-to-version -2-k7 modules-image
make-kpkg --append-to-version -2-k7 modules_image
exec debian/rules DEBIAN_REVISION=2.6.16-10.00.Custom
APPEND_TO_VERSION=-2-k7 modules_image The changelog says we are
creating
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:38:53 +0200 Dirk Schleicher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:24:50 +0200
schrieb Evgeni Golov:
Hallo,
make-kpkg --append-to-version -2-k7 modules-image
make-kpkg --append-to-version -2-k7 modules_image
exec debian/rules
Am Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:49:15 +0200
schrieb Evgeni Golov:
Hallo,
Ööööh, make-kpkg clean
Du hast da was verdreht (bzw make-kpkg hats für dich erledigt :().
Nach dem clean sollte es gehen.
pinguinstall:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg clean
exec debian/rules DEBIAN_REVISION=5:10.Custom clean
==
Dirk Schleicher schrieb:
Hallo Leute,
ich versuche module zu backen und bekomme diese Meldung.
make-kpkg modules_image
exec debian/rules DEBIAN_REVISION=2.6.16-10.00.Custom modules_image
echo The UTS Release version in include/linux/version.h; echo
\2.6.16-2-k7\ ; echo does not match
On (21/12/04 08:22), Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
From: Matt Zagrabelny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Unidentified subject!
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:22:15 -0600
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.0.1
On
hello,
trying to get the hostap modules working:
# aptitude install hostap-source
$ make-kpkg --append-to-version=.20041220.0 kernel_image modules_image
# dpkg -i /usr/src/kernel-image2.6.9.20041220.0_10.00.Custom_i386.deb
# dpkg -i /usr/src/hostap-modules-2.6.9.20041220.0_0.2.5-1
On (20/12/04 15:30), Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
hello,
trying to get the hostap modules working:
# aptitude install hostap-source
$ make-kpkg --append-to-version=.20041220.0 kernel_image modules_image
# dpkg -i
hej,
mam problem z utworzeniem pakietów z modułami kernela lm-sensors i i2c
przy pomocy make-kpkg. Źródła ściągnąłem u źródła, a nie jako pakiet
debiana, czy to może być przyczyną?
Innymi słowy, czy przy pomocy make-kpkg modules_image mogę kompilować
tylko źródła modułów, które ściagnąłem
Je suis en unstable et je cherche a installer le package nvidia-kernel-src
dans /usr/src/linux :
% make-kpkg --revision=manu1.0 modules_image
(...)
/usr/bin/make -C
/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-1.0.2880/NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-2880
SYSINCLUDE=/usr/src/linux/include NVdriver
make[2]: Entering
le Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 04:20:19PM +0100, Ledoux Emmanuel a ecrit:
Je suis en unstable et je cherche a installer le package nvidia-kernel-src
/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-1.0.2880/NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-2880
Oula gros probleme alors...
en unstable (ie en sid) le driver nvidia c'est maintenant
hacer
make-kpkg modules_image pero no tengo éxito (y ya estoy desesperado :'(
Me devuelve el mensaje diciendo que no parece que esté en el nivel más
alto del directorio de las fuentes del kernel etc etc etc...
Según leí en la lista, no es necesario descargarse las fuentes del
kernel
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 16:16, Fermín Manzanedo wrote:
.
5.Entro en /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-1.0.4349 e intento hacer
make-kpkg modules_image pero no tengo éxito (y ya estoy desesperado :'(
Me devuelve el mensaje diciendo que no parece que esté en el nivel más
alto del
Comment utiliser ces headers à la place des sources?? J'ai déjà eu le
même problème avec les pilotes nvidia, et j'avais simplement recompilé
un noyau, juste pour avoir un répertoire sources. Mais c'est un peu
lourd, non?
tu peux essayer cette astuce :
installer le paquet
[ avec éventuellement qq questions supplémentaires sur ta config ]
- ensuite tu compile ton module :
make-kpkg modules_image
bonne chance,
Fred.
--
Frédéric Boiteux - Calistel
binary
grep: /lib/modules/2.4.20verbusb/build/include/linux/compile.h: Aucun fichier
ou répertoire de ce type
Use make-kpkg to compile this module
make: *** [binary] Erreur 1
Qu'à cela ne tienne :
$ make-kpkg modules_image
We do not seem to be in a top level linux kernel source directory
(...)
Là
[...]
Qu'à cela ne tienne :
$ make-kpkg modules_image
We do not seem to be in a top level linux kernel source directory
(...)
Là je suis bloqué. j'ai essayé de lancer make-kpkg depuis plusieurs
répertoires différents. Ça ne marche que depuis un répertoire
sources. Or, je voudrais utiliser le
bonjour,
Quelqu'un peut-il m'expliquer (j'ai lu la doc, mais mal pê ?) pourquoi
make-kpkg --revision=foo --append_to_version bar kernel_image
_suivi_ de
make-kpkg --revision=foo --append_to_version bar --added-modules
mod1,mod2 modules_image
donne deux fois le
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 10:00:31PM -0800, Kurt Lieber wrote:
I just compiled a new kernel and realized that I forgot to include ppp
support in the kernel.
Rather than recompiling a new custom kernel, can I just make-kpkg clean, make
menuconfig and make-kpkg modules_image to compile ppp
Kurt Lieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just compiled a new kernel and realized that I forgot to include ppp
support in the kernel.
Rather than recompiling a new custom kernel, can I just make-kpkg clean, make
menuconfig and make-kpkg modules_image to compile ppp kernel support
On Sunday 20 January 2002 02:03 am, Brian Nelson wrote:
No. Do 'make-kpkg kernel_image' instead. modules_image is for modules
external to the kernel source, like ALSA.
OK, so I went ahead and recompiled the kernel using make-kpkg kernel_image
Assuming so, what do I then need to do to make
Kurt Lieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 20 January 2002 02:03 am, Brian Nelson wrote:
No. Do 'make-kpkg kernel_image' instead. modules_image is for modules
external to the kernel source, like ALSA.
OK, so I went ahead and recompiled the kernel using make-kpkg kernel_image
I just compiled a new kernel and realized that I forgot to include ppp
support in the kernel.
Rather than recompiling a new custom kernel, can I just make-kpkg clean, make
menuconfig and make-kpkg modules_image to compile ppp kernel support as a
module?
Assuming so, what do I then need to do
Hi,
Richard == Richard E Hawkins Esq [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard It seems that make-kpkg modules_image runs the pcmcia
Richard config script, with a string of \n's to take the
Richard defaults--forcing the package defaults, rather than the
Richard current config. I had to edit
It took me a whiel to figure out what was going on here. I was trying
compile a kernel pcmcia stuff for another computer (using a P2 for a
486).
It seems that make-kpkg modules_image runs the pcmcia config script,
with a string of \n's to take the defaults--forcing the package
defaults
27 matches
Mail list logo
