Michelle Konzack([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Am 2006-10-03 17:47:26, schrieb Wayne Topa:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
> > a month or so. I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
> > these errors:
>
>
Am 2006-10-03 17:47:26, schrieb Wayne Topa:
> Hi all
>
> I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
> a month or so. I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
> these errors:
> I have also tried different version of the kernel-package.
> kernel-package
Wayne Topa([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Hi all
>
> I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
> a month or so. I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
> these errors:
>
> VT3 root-3-ETCH:/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.17# make-kpkg --revis
On 10/03/2006 09:35 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
Mumia W..([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On 10/03/2006 04:47 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
Hi all
I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
a month or so. I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
these er
Mumia W..([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On 10/03/2006 04:47 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
> >Hi all
> >
> > I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
> > a month or so. I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
> > these errors:
> >[...]
>
> Quick
On 10/03/2006 04:47 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
Hi all
I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
a month or so. I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
these errors:
[...]
Quick question: did you do a "make-kpkg clean" first?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hi all
I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
a month or so. I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
these errors:
VT3 root-3-ETCH:/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.17# make-kpkg --revision
1:buddy.2.2.17 --initrd kernel_image
exec make -f /usr/share/kern
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 10:11:28PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Mark F. Mangano wrote:
> >Finally got it working. Turns out there was some problem compiling 2.6.3
> >with gcc-3.3; when I changed the /usr/bin/gcc symlink back to the older
> >gcc-2.95, it compiled fine.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Mark.
>
Mark F. Mangano wrote:
Finally got it working. Turns out there was some problem compiling 2.6.3
with gcc-3.3; when I changed the /usr/bin/gcc symlink back to the older
gcc-2.95, it compiled fine.
Thanks,
Mark.
I don't think that was the problem:
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040314
Mark F. Mangano wrote:
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 the mental interface of Mark F. Mangano told:
Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall:
as root:
'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3'
'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3'
'cd /usr/src'
'tar xjvf kerne
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 the mental interface of
Mark F. Mangano told:
Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall:
as root:
'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3'
'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3'
'cd /usr/src'
'tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.3.tar.bz2'
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 the mental interface of
Mark F. Mangano told:
> Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall:
>
> as root:
> 'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3'
> 'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3'
> 'cd /usr/src'
> 'tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.3.tar.bz2'
> 'export PA
Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall:
as root:
'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3'
'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3'
'cd /usr/src'
'tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.3.tar.bz2'
'export PATCH_THE_KERNEL=YES'
'cp /boot/config-2.6.1.b02082004 /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.3/.c
Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall:
as root:
'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3'
'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3'
'cd /usr/src'
'tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.3.tar.bz2'
'export PATCH_THE_KERNEL=YES'
'cp /boot/config-2.6.1.b02082004 /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.3/.c
> From: Steve Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: Debian User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: make-kpkg problem
> > Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:15:29 -0600 (CST)
> > Resent-From: [EMAIL PRO
ian User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: make-kpkg problem
> Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:15:29 -0600 (CST)
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Ritesh,
>
> Edit your /etc/kernel-pkg.conf file and add the following:
>
> do_clean:=No
>
> Stev
Ritesh,
Edit your /etc/kernel-pkg.conf file and add the following:
do_clean:=No
Steve
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 01:16:50AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello all,
> One generic problem. I use make-kpkg to recompile kernels and get my kernel
> images in .deb . Now everytime the ker
Hello all,
One generic problem. I use make-kpkg to recompile kernels and get my kernel
images in .deb . Now everytime the kernel image is created, make-kpkg seems to clean
up the build directory. If I missed something, I'm supposed to start of from the very
beginning. Is there any option
Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 09:25:28AM +0800, Joel wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
That looks like gcc isn't installed.
$ gcc --version
3.0.2
thanks anyway.
Do you have the environment variable $CC set to something else? What
does the following print?
${CC
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 09:25:28AM +0800, Joel wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >That looks like gcc isn't installed.
>
> $ gcc --version
> 3.0.2
>
> thanks anyway.
Do you have the environment variable $CC set to something else? What
does the following print?
${CC:-gcc} --print-libgcc-file-name
Colin Watson wrote:
That looks like gcc isn't installed.
$ gcc --version
3.0.2
thanks anyway.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ulf Rompe wrote:
Your architecture seems to be misrecognized.
do you have any idea how do I correct this?
$ dpkg --print-architecture
i386
If you aren't able to
figure out why, you may want to force a correct name by setting it
yourself:
make-kpkg --arch i386 clean
[x] ulf
ok.
but
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 07:51:52PM +0800, Joel wrote:
> i tried to compile package a custom built kernel and encountered this error.
>
> - - - - - - - start
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.6/linux$ make-kpkg clean
> dpkg: warning, architecture `i386-none' not in remapping tabl
Joel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i tried to compile package a custom built kernel and encountered
> this error.
[...]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.6/linux$ make-kpkg clean
> dpkg: warning, architecture `i386-none' not in remapping table
Your architecture seems to be misreco
i tried to compile package a custom built kernel and encountered this error.
- - - - - - - start
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/kernel-dev/linux-2.5.6/linux$ make-kpkg clean
dpkg: warning, architecture `i386-none' not in remapping table
rm -f modules/modversions.h modules/ksyms.ver debian/files stam
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 06:31:17PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> try doing a make-kpkg clean and then starting it again. Remember that
> after a clean you must run it with the --revision switch if you want
> to add a revision (and you do want to add a revision).
Thanks. I had done the ma
>
> Does anyone know what this means? I've been using make-kpkg for over a
> year with no problems, but this started happening a week or so ago.
>
try doing a make-kpkg clean and then starting it again. Remember that after a
clean you must run it with the --revision switch if you want to add a
make-kpkg keeps dying on me. I've tried several different kernel-source
packages, but they all seem to die in pretty much the same way:
When I run
fakeroot make-kpkg kernel_image
make-kpkg runs through the kernel configuration, and then does this:
*** End of Linux kernel configuration.
**
I just upgraded from slink to potato rather successfully. I am having
a problem upgrading my kernel from 2.0.38 to 2.2.17. I installed
kernel-package, and grabbed the Debian kernel-source-2.2.17 package,
unzipped/untarred it from /usr/src, creating the new directory
/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.17.
I just upgraded from slink to potato rather successfully. I am having
a problem upgrading my kernel from 2.0.38 to 2.2.17pre6-1. I
installed kernel-package, and grabbed kernel-source-2.2.17,
unzipped/untarred it from /usr/src, creating the new directory
/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.17. Then ran th
Hi,
Yes, this is th expected behaviour. make-kpkg clean should
always be done before building a new kernel, and make-kpkg makes sure
to always re-institute the include/asm link during the build.
make-kpkg dep is not required (it is not a valid argument
anyway).
Why wou
>
> I extracted kernel-source-2.0.30_2.0.30-7.deb so that I can home-brew a
> kernel. There is a problem in that when I do a "make-kpkg clean" it
> actually does a "make mrproper" and amongst other things I lose my
> include/asm link. A "make clean" works as expected.
What include/asm link?
If
I extracted kernel-source-2.0.30_2.0.30-7.deb so that I can home-brew a
kernel. There is a problem in that when I do a "make-kpkg clean" it
actually does a "make mrproper" and amongst other things I lose my
include/asm link. A "make clean" works as expected.
Is this intended? I have looked at
33 matches
Mail list logo
