Mike Bird:
>
> I can understand not updating Stable but the lack of migrations to Testing
> means that we have to run bleeding edge Sid 2.6.24 kernels on nine-month
> old production laptops (Thinkpad T61) which have been supported by the
> kernel since 2.6.23 was released four months ago. (We had
On Thu February 7 2008 01:14:40 Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Yes. :) It's just that the rules for a package to move from unstable to
> testing are quite tough. Which they should be, because every transition
> to testing might be the last one for a package before the release.
This is particularly a probl
Paul Dwerryhouse:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:48:14PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Gentlemen, why not let the others get cut on the cutting edge of
>> Debian sid whilst we relax and wait oh, say 72 hours for the packages
>> we want to stabilize? Slightly stable unstable, but not too stable a
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:48:14PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gentlemen, why not let the others get cut on the cutting edge of
> Debian sid whilst we relax and wait oh, say 72 hours for the packages
> we want to stabilize? Slightly stable unstable, but not too stable as
> to be stale as stab
Gentlemen, why not let the others get cut on the cutting edge of
Debian sid whilst we relax and wait oh, say 72 hours for the packages
we want to stabilize? Slightly stable unstable, but not too stable as
to be stale as stable.
Sure, man apt.conf mentions Max-Age, but that is only for index files
5 matches
Mail list logo
