Re: max processes

2000-01-20 Thread Konrad Mierendorff
aphro wrote: > > mieren >My common sense tells me that that depends on your hardware. > > dual p2-233 128MB .. Well, my common sense was a bit lazy yesterday, but now it is perfectly aware of the fact that it depends on the processes as well :-) But as my common sense produces rather stupid answ

Re: max processes

2000-01-19 Thread aphro
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Konrad Mierendorff wrote: mieren >My common sense tells me that that depends on your hardware. dual p2-233 128MB .. nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail In

Re: max processes

2000-01-19 Thread Konrad Mierendorff
aphro wrote: > > i was wondering what people do for max processes for a webserver, until > recently my system was doing fine with a max of 30 processes, but i added > a new(big) virtual domain which eats up a lot of them, i increased it to > 120 ..how high can i go and still be

max processes

2000-01-18 Thread aphro
i was wondering what people do for max processes for a webserver, until recently my system was doing fine with a max of 30 processes, but i added a new(big) virtual domain which eats up a lot of them, i increased it to 120 ..how high can i go and still be safe? running linux 2.0.36+securelinux