On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Darac Marjal wrote:
. . .
# script -t 2>~/upgrade-debian.time -a ~/upgrade-debian.script
. . .
hi Darac,
thank you for this information, but frankly, I'm not convinced by this
solution,
It's much easier to browse a file with an editor, that looking at the full
repla
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 06:20:13PM +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
>
> >I have a shortcut for apt-get install which is:
> > apt-get --install-suggests install "$@" 2>&1 | tee -a $LOG
> >With that, I get the 1st prompt (Do you want to continue? [Y/n]),
Pierre Frenkiel:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Jochen Spieker wrote:
>
>> I cannot reproduce the above error message:
>> . . .
>>| Are you sure you want to install/upgrade the above packages? [Y/n/?/...]
>> . . .
>> I cannot figure out what's different on your system either. Apt-listbugs
>> should never
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
I have a shortcut for apt-get install which is:
apt-get --install-suggests install "$@" 2>&1 | tee -a $LOG
With that, I get the 1st prompt (Do you want to continue? [Y/n]), but
the install fails without the 2nd prompt.
I also tried with output r
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Jochen Spieker wrote:
I cannot reproduce the above error message:
. . .
| Are you sure you want to install/upgrade the above packages? [Y/n/?/...]
. . .
I cannot figure out what's different on your system either. Apt-listbugs
should never abort package installation without a
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:42:29PM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> >> http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/other/stable.html
> >
> > thank you for this useful link.
> > how come mediatomb is not listed here. It should be in category:
> > "Number that have a fix prepared and waiting to up
Pierre Frenkiel:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Jochen Spieker wrote:
>
>>>
>>> serious bugs of mediatomb (-> 0.12.1-4)
>>> #677959 - mediatomb: fails to build against current version of
>>> libavformat (Fixed: mediatomb/0.12.1-5)
>>>
>>> I have several question about this error:
>>
>> By the wa
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Jochen Spieker wrote:
serious bugs of mediatomb (-> 0.12.1-4)
#677959 - mediatomb: fails to build against current version of
libavformat (Fixed: mediatomb/0.12.1-5)
I have several question about this error:
By the way: the above is not an error.
I see that:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Jochen Spieker wrote:
Packages in stable only receive updates for security reasons or in order
to fix other serious bugs. You might be interested in backports:
I would imagine that a bug which prevents a package to be installed can be
called
"serious" !!
I have sin
Pierre Frenkiel:
>
> Trying to install mediatomb on wheezy, I got:
>
>serious bugs of mediatomb (-> 0.12.1-4)
>#677959 - mediatomb: fails to build against current version of
>libavformat (Fixed: mediatomb/0.12.1-5)
>
> I have several question about this error:
By the way: the above
Pierre Frenkiel:
>
> At last, mediatomb 0.12-5 is now provided by Jessie (don't know since how
> long)
> I suppose it means that it will arrive in Wheezy some day..
No. Packages don't get moved from testing to stable. Ever.
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch02.en.html#_debian
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Chris Bannister wrote:
hi Chris,
Before replying, I waited until the release of the Wheezy version 7.2,
but this changed nothing about mediatomb
1/ what means "fixed mediatomb/0.12.1-5" ?
The bug no longer exists in version 0.12.1-5
I understood that, but my hidden que
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 05:09:21PM +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> Trying to install mediatomb on wheezy, I got:
>
>serious bugs of mediatomb (-> 0.12.1-4)
>#677959 - mediatomb: fails to build against current version of
>libavformat (Fixed: mediatomb/0.12.1-5)
>
> I have severa
hi,
Trying to install mediatomb on wheezy, I got:
serious bugs of mediatomb (-> 0.12.1-4)
#677959 - mediatomb: fails to build against current version of
libavformat (Fixed: mediatomb/0.12.1-5)
I have several question about this error:
1/ what means "fixed mediatomb/0.12.1-5" ?
2/ I i
14 matches
Mail list logo
