RE: minimal impact kernel upgrade

2003-01-22 Thread Narins, Josh
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 05:20:25PM +, Simon Tod wrote: > > The current kernel I'm using on my laptop - "unname -r" gives just > > 2.4.19 without any extensions (?) - doesn't support APM. > Are you sure? :-) > > All I'm really interested in doing is and "apt-get install > > kernel-image-2.4.1

Re: minimal impact kernel upgrade

2003-01-19 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 05:20:25PM +, Simon Tod wrote: > The current kernel I'm using on my laptop - "unname -r" gives just > 2.4.19 without any extensions (?) - doesn't support APM. Are you sure? :-) > All I'm really interested in doing is and "apt-get install > kernel-image-2.4.19-686" and f

Re: minimal impact kernel upgrade

2003-01-14 Thread sean finney
heya, if you're going from one debian-supplied kernel to another, i don't imagine that you'll horribly break anything. worst case scenario, you can tell lilo to boot into linux.old and have your old system back. some stuff i'd hold onto is - your current kernel's config options (/boot/config-2.

Re: minimal impact kernel upgrade

2003-01-14 Thread nate
Simon Tod said: > The current kernel I'm using on my laptop - "unname > -r" gives just 2.4.19 without any extensions (?) - > doesn't support APM. All I'm really interested in > doing is and "apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.19-686" > and following the instructions... BUT how can I do > this without

minimal impact kernel upgrade

2003-01-14 Thread Simon Tod
The current kernel I'm using on my laptop - "unname -r" gives just 2.4.19 without any extensions (?) - doesn't support APM. All I'm really interested in doing is and "apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.19-686" and following the instructions... BUT how can I do this without screwing up all the stuff t