On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 06:31:35PM -0600, Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
> hi
>
> why -10 insists on having tons of stuff installed i really
> don't use?
>
> like xfs, or rstart(d), or twm (is there any person alive who
> uses twm?), or xmh, or xterm, or...
It doesn't. Read the extended description of
On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 11:19:07AM -0800, Paul Nathan Puri wrote:
> > I recently upgraded to potato.
> >
> > Now X starts and immediately dies. Why would this be?
>
> This is (probably) a known bug in -9. Upgrade to -10.
>
> > What are the minimum
On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 11:19:07AM -0800, Paul Nathan Puri wrote:
> I recently upgraded to potato.
>
> Now X starts and immediately dies. Why would this be?
This is (probably) a known bug in -9. Upgrade to -10.
> What are the minimum packages necessary to run X under potato (or in general)?
x
In a message dated 2/8/99 1:13:54 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'd like to know the answer to the question: "What is a minimal set
> of packages necessary to run X?"
>
I'd say (for hamm) xbase, xserver-svga (or other depending on your card),
xserver-vga16, and xfnts7
On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Daniel Martin wrote:
> Paul Nathan Puri <"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"@office.law-counsellor.com>
> writes:
> >[...] What are the
> > minimum packages necessary to run X under potato (or in general)?
[snipped: useful answer by Daniel to the Potato X problem]
I'd like to know the ans
Paul Nathan Puri <"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"@office.law-counsellor.com> writes:
> I recently upgraded to potato.
>
> Now X starts and immediately dies. Why would this be? What are the
> minimum packages necessary to run X under potato (or in general)?
It would probably be because the X maintainer l
I recently upgraded to potato.
Now X starts and immediately dies. Why would this be? What are the minimum
packages necessary to run X under potato (or in general)?
Thanks,
NatePuri
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
7 matches
Mail list logo