Andrea Borgia wrote:
> Noted, as this tip would have been very useful a few weeks ago :P
> Anyhow, I moved to "testing" so this is probably an issue solved for good.
Well, I hope it will not be the last one for you :)
Read the upgrade notes from Debian - saved me many troubles and I know
people
Il 25/01/19 19:44, deloptes ha scritto:
# dpkg --get-selections before upgrade (is in the upgrade notes AFAIR > and
then need to reinstall packages that are kept back. when reinstalling
they pull the right dependencies. Indeed it is a bit of work ... like
20-30min, but upgrade is done every
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 01:20:29PM +0100, Andrea Borgia wrote:
TLDR it's complicated :)
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203211
Or at least it was. That bug was closed in 2017. There is currently
nobody formally requesting the package nor formally indicating that it
is being
Re this:
On Fri 25 Jan 2019 at 16:46:41 (+0100), Andrea Borgia wrote:
> I had TONS of problems upgrading from stable to testing due to libraries
> installed from d-m over time, in fact :/
> Third time was a charm, though: I had learnt about that and premptively
> removed everything that was not
Andrea Borgia wrote:
> It's more like an issue with the libraries than the apps themselves: the
> apps in d-m are not in Debian and won't directly be affected. However,
> shared libraries in Debian might be upgraded to different versions pulled
> in from d-m and that's where the problems will
Il giorno ven 25 gen 2019 alle ore 17:40 deloptes ha
scritto:
> David Wright wrote:
> > And to be fair, that has been spelled out in the Release Notes ever
> > since etch was released in 2007. Before that, the warning was less
> > explicit.
>
Of course, it was not my intention to blame anyone
David Wright wrote:
> And to be fair, that has been spelled out in the Release Notes ever
> since etch was released in 2007. Before that, the warning was less
> explicit.
No idea what you are talking about, perhaps I am the only lucky one, or I am
not using the apps that caused your problems
On Fri 25 Jan 2019 at 16:46:41 (+0100), Andrea Borgia wrote:
> I had TONS of problems upgrading from stable to testing due to libraries
> installed from d-m over time, in fact :/
> Third time was a charm, though: I had learnt about that and premptively
> removed everything that was not in the main
I had TONS of problems upgrading from stable to testing due to libraries
installed from d-m over time, in fact :/
Third time was a charm, though: I had learnt about that and premptively
removed everything that was not in the main repo :)
Il giorno ven 25 gen 2019 alle ore 16:34 Frank McCormick <
Frank McCormick wrote:
> I was under the impression that it has been suggested in the past to not
> use packages from deb-multimedia.org as it causes other problems?
Might be, but for the past 10y I have encountered null. If you mess up with
your system for sure, but all works great on default
On 1/25/19 8:25 AM, deloptes wrote:
bapt x wrote:
Hello,
Is there a reason for avidemux video editor is not being in the official
Debian package repository?
I see multimedia packages like VLC video player are present in the
official repository so it should not be a legal problem.
It would
On 1/25/19, Andrea Borgia wrote:
> TLDR it's complicated :)
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203211
Going all DR like that meant you missed the very special message that
your parcel package couldn't be delivered =D
> Il giorno ven 25 gen 2019 alle ore 13:09 bapt x ha
>
bapt x wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a reason for avidemux video editor is not being in the official
> Debian package repository?
> I see multimedia packages like VLC video player are present in the
> official repository so it should not be a legal problem.
> It would be nice to have this package
TLDR it's complicated :)
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203211
Il giorno ven 25 gen 2019 alle ore 13:09 bapt x ha
scritto:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a reason for avidemux video editor is not being in the official
> Debian package repository?
> I see multimedia packages like VLC
Hello,
Is there a reason for avidemux video editor is not being in the official
Debian package repository?
I see multimedia packages like VLC video player are present in the official
repository so it should not be a legal problem.
It would be nice to have this package in the official repository
15 matches
Mail list logo
