> > how do I enable ip aliasing?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wayne Sitton
> > > How do I bind 2 ip's to the same nic in Debian
> > >
> > enable ip aliasing in the kernel.
> > then do:
> > ifconfig eth0 ip1/mask [fo
okok
here is where i am:
when i run lsmod i have no modules listed but
modconf still thinks they are there
i updated my kernel from 2.0.38 to 2.2.14 and i
don't think all the module info updated correctly
how do i do thiswhat i did was copy some of the
modules from /lib/mo
/i386/boot'
make: *** [install] Error 2
therefore my linux-2.2.14/modules folder is
practicly empty.
why???
>hello,
>since i updated my kernel the modconf doesn't
show any of my modules
>how do i point the modconf to my new
>modules folder
/usr/src/linux/modules
hello,
since i updated my kernel the modconf doesn't show
any of my modules
how do i point the modconf to my new
modules folder /usr/src/linux/modules
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 08:24:52AM +, john smith wrote:
> I have successfully updated my kernel from 2.2.13 to 2.2.14 but when I
> issued the command modconf I noticed that there are only two categories of
> modules misc and net, what happened to the rest? and furthermore, the
I have successfully updated my kernel from 2.2.13 to 2.2.14 but when I
issued the command modconf I noticed that there are only two categories of
modules misc and net, what happened to the rest? and furthermore, the
modules that are in the misc and net are incomplete compared to the modules
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Oooo, yuck. Please keep lines to <76 characters, please.
On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, Jonathan Heaney wrote:
> I actually prefer to add modules manually to /etc/modules as I find
> modutils sometimes destroys little additions I have made to the module
> options file (s
Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Is there any way to get modconf to install on the current release of
> potato? Failing that, what are the necessary commands at the console to:
> 1) See what modules my kernel is compiled to support (I know what they
> are, just not the module names - the
Is there any way to get modconf to install on the current release of
potato? Failing that, what are the necessary commands at the console to:
1) See what modules my kernel is compiled to support (I know what they
are, just not the module names - they were never mentioned in make
xconfig)
2) See
Hwei Sheng TEOH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Apparently there is some dependency problem around newt0.30 and whiptail that
> caused a cascade of packages to need removal?
This has been discussed on the IRC channel recently. It seems there are
some packages which specify a dependency of "slang1 (
t-get responded that the
packages ae, gimp, modconf, newt0.30, whiptail would have been *removed*.
Apparently there is some dependency problem around newt0.30 and whiptail that
caused a cascade of packages to need removal? But what I really *don't*
understand is why gimp would be removed. What h
I have an Intel network card and the module is eepro100.o
How can I install it with modconf to the kernel, what parameters do I need?
I used modcnf but it didn't work:
installation wasn't succesful
Gabor
Paul McDermott wrote:
> whiptail from the incoming. My question is this how do I get to the
> incoming directory? Does anyone have any ideas in this particular
> situation.
> Paul
>
have you tried ftp://ftp1.us.debian.org/debian/Incoming if it is not there I
had attached the one I had d/l .
go
Paul McDermott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello everyone, I am trying to install modconf but it depends on
> whiptail. Whiptail is not a package. I installed newt0.20 (gave me
> /usr/bin/whiptail) but that did not help. There has been discussion
> abot this topic but n
Hello everyone, I am trying to install modconf but it depends on whiptail.
Whiptail is not a package. I installed newt0.20 (gave me
/usr/bin/whiptail) but that did not help. There has been discussion abot
this topic but no one really knows what to do about this situation. There
was a possible
>
> Go to a site that mirrors debian-incoming such as ftp.du.debian.org and
> get the newt and whiptail that you find there.
You must mean ftp.de.debian.org
>
Joop
--
Joop Stakenborg PA3ABA
Linux hamradio software map: http://huizen.dds.nl/~pa3aba
( === Still under construction =
I should have followed the discussion on the modconf package under the
unstable or hamm distribution more closely but I didn't. In trying to
install the modconf_0.2.16 package I get a message that it requires
whiptail but whiptail is not available. This has been the case for
over a week
On Thu, Feb 05, 1998 at 11:21:25AM +0100, Frere Roy wrote:
> I am trying to install modconf_0.2.15.deb but I get the message
> "whiptail is not installed"
>
> I have, however, installed newt0.21_0.21-3.deb which has installed
> whiptail.
>
> Have I missed something?
>
> Thanks, Roy
There's a
On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Frere Roy wrote:
> I am trying to install modconf_0.2.15.deb but I get the message
> "whiptail is not installed"
>
> I have, however, installed newt0.21_0.21-3.deb which has installed
> whiptail.
>
> Have I missed something?
Yes, newt0.21_0.21-4.deb which no longer contai
On Thu, Feb 05, 1998 at 11:21:25AM +0100, Frere Roy wrote:
> I am trying to install modconf_0.2.15.deb but I get the message "whiptail
> is not installed"
>
> I have, however, installed newt0.21_0.21-3.deb which has installed
> whiptail.
With a newer newt release, whiptail is now in a package of
I am trying to install modconf_0.2.15.deb but I get the message
"whiptail is not installed"
I have, however, installed newt0.21_0.21-3.deb which has installed
whiptail.
Have I missed something?
Thanks, Roy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PR
On Mon, 2 Feb 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I went to upgrade and it says the new version of modconf depends on whiptail
> which isn't a package, teh 'i' command shows two different depends though,
> one says newt0.2 (or similiar number) and the other shows whiptail,
I went to upgrade and it says the new version of modconf depends on whiptail
which isn't a package, teh 'i' command shows two different depends though,
one says newt0.2 (or similiar number) and the other shows whiptail, is this
a bug? if not where is whiptail?
G'razel the sh
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
