The answers to your questions depend on what hardware you're using, what kind of
processor, how many RAM. Concerning the CPU, the output of
cat /proc/cpuinfo
would give some insight.
--
Regards,
jvp.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
Hi.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:35:46PM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Pascal Hambourg writes:
>
> > Harry Putnam a écrit :
> >>
> >> My question is whether continuing to use the 486 versions of kernels
> >> has any down sides?
> >
> > The -486 kernel lacks support for multiprocessing/hyperthread
Pascal Hambourg writes:
> Harry Putnam a écrit :
>>
>> My question is whether continuing to use the 486 versions of kernels
>> has any down sides?
>
> The -486 kernel lacks support for multiprocessing/hyperthreading and PAE
> (which is required for NX/XD bit).
I see in my latest `full-upgrade'
Harry Putnam a écrit :
>
> My question is whether continuing to use the 486 versions of kernels
> has any down sides?
The -486 kernel lacks support for multiprocessing/hyperthreading and PAE
(which is required for NX/XD bit).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
On 22/11/14 06:18 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Months ago, installing jessie as guest on win7-64, I somehow ended up
with a 486 kernel.
In other previous installs it was a 686 kernel... not sure what I
did. But no doubt I selected it without realizing or the like.
My question is whether continuing
Months ago, installing jessie as guest on win7-64, I somehow ended up
with a 486 kernel.
In other previous installs it was a 686 kernel... not sure what I
did. But no doubt I selected it without realizing or the like.
My question is whether continuing to use the 486 versions of kernels
has any d
6 matches
Mail list logo
