Re: mutt v. elm: reply-to-list

Stephen Patterson wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > At least if you hit L (IIRC, been a long time since I've used mutt), > > it automatically understands that you're replying to the mailing list > > itself. > > Though you do have to set the subscribe variable so that mutt recognises > the email add

Re: mutt v. elm: reply-to-list

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 03:10:05 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote: > At least if you hit L (IIRC, been a long time since I've used mutt), > it automatically understands that you're replying to the mailing list > itself. Though you do have to set the subscribe variable so that mutt recognises the email addre

mutt v. elm: reply-to-list

Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Drifting off topic > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:26:58PM +, Tom Kuiper wrote: > >> The way 'elm' parses the header, if I reply only to you, no copy goes to >> the list. So, I do a 'group reply' to pick up what is on the Cc: line. > > Mutt does the