Is there someone who can help me out with "ls" (listing) in ftp or ncftp.
I have tried to work with ftp at my domain at my ISP, but ls in ftp is
not working???
I have tried in passive mode e.d. but no it's not working
But "cd" e.d. is fine.
Can someone point m
Hello, everyone:
I have a box running Debian Sarge GNU/Linux.
Hardware: Dual Xeon 2.8G/1G Ram/146G*3 Scsi Raid5 on Megaraid
hardware controller.
Software: Debian Sarge/2.6.8 kernel/Squid/Proftpd/Apache2/ncftp all
debian sarge default version and is updated now
On Monday 20 June 2005 00.20, LeVA wrote:
> I'm using ncftp 3.1.9, but can not use the DEL or HOME/END keys in the
> ncftp's prompt, instead I get the tilde (~) character for those
> buttons. I'm using the ISO-8859-2 locale (if itt matters).
>
> Anyone knows a solu
Hi!
I'm using ncftp 3.1.9, but can not use the DEL or HOME/END keys in the ncftp's
prompt, instead I get the tilde (~) character for those buttons. I'm using
the ISO-8859-2 locale (if itt matters).
Anyone knows a solution for this?
Thanks!
Daniel
--
LeVA
--
To UNSUBS
From:
Alex Malinovic
ncftp2 is the old ncftp client which many people really liked to use
in scripts (a la wget). ncftp (3.x+) is a rewrite which focuses on
using ncftp as a client application, not an automated scripting tool.
If you prefer a CLI ftp client to a GUI like I do, ncftp (3.x+) is
On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 19:17 -0600, Gayle Lee Fairless wrote:
> I note that ncftp is perhaps ten times bigger than ncftp2 and is a
> rewrite of it with ncurses being in it. And ncftp2 has no SOCKS in it.
> (It's barefoot?)
>
> What is the difference between the t
I note that ncftp is perhaps ten times bigger than ncftp2 and is a
rewrite of it with ncurses being in it. And ncftp2 has no SOCKS in it.
(It's barefoot?)
What is the difference between the two? Or rather, what does it
mean? It appears that ncftp is more of a GUI application
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 06:46:53PM +0900, ??? wrote:
> There is some way to backup data like ncftpput -R -u expt -p expt
> ftp://21.101.3.12/tmp c:/temp.Sat.tgz. Then is there a way to
> renameing the file temp.Sat.tgz through ncftp?
I don't use ncftp but I see the man page
Hi, all
There is some way to backup data like ncftpput -R -u expt -p expt
ftp://21.101.3.12/tmp c:/temp.Sat.tgz. Then is there a way to renameing the file
temp.Sat.tgz through ncftp?
Thanx a lot..
èPÔ ¨¥¶^n&§ºÇ«ê®zËeËluæâjz+
«.n7¶î˱Êâmäë¢æåx*'µ§-+-«-z¹b²Û y¸à
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Monday 24 June 2002 05:13 pm, behapy wrote:
> Hi, all?
>
> I'd like to transfer files from M$windows to Unix-clone system through
> ssh by ncftp.
> Is it possible that I use ncftp with ssh on Windows? I know that there are
>
Hi, all?
I'd like to transfer files from M$windows to Unix-clone system through ssh
by ncftp.
Is it possible that I use ncftp with ssh on Windows? I know that there are ssh
solutions
for M$windows. Those are putty.exe and psftp.exe. Please let me know about
the documents
for
> | put index.html: PORT failed.
sounds like you may be runing behind some sort of
NAT and it isn't doing ftp right. try putting the
client in passive mode before uploading ..
if that fails, try to ftp without doing NAT.
nate
I am using testing debian, the ncftp can't put file to myisp
a/c!
the error is...
--
/ ncftp /public_html > put index.html
| Invalid reply: "."
| Passive mode refused.
| put index.html: PORT failed.
| ncftp /public_html > ls
| Invalid reply: "."
| Li
m
It's a straight forward build, no tweaks, no hacks. This is what I do:
# apt-get -d source ncftp
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Need to get 408kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://ftp.se.debian.org sid/main ncftp 2:3.0.2-3 (dsc) [665B]
Get:2 http://ftp.se.debi
Hello all,
I'm using ncftp NcFTP 3.0.0/291 on an hpux 10.2 server. The remote host is
an NT4.0 server.
I'm having two problems:
1/ under the ./ncftp directory, I created a macro in the macros file like:
macro .open.tfe
lcd /opt/ar/ewm/TFE
mput *.csv
quit
end
My goal is to automat
The license for libncftp (part of the newer versions of ncftp) prevents
it from being included in Debian. You can still get the source and
self-compile.
Bob
On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 01:29:49PM +0200, Marcus Johansson wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Why is there no ncftp 3.0.0 (beta) in pot
Hi!
Why is there no ncftp 3.0.0 (beta) in potato/unstable?
In slink there was a 3.0.0 beta14, and as far as I know there is a beta18 out.
Sigh, please dont say ncftp gone commercial?
/Marcus
> > I used to be able to continue an interrupted ftp upload in ncftp just
> > by typing "put -C filename". It would continue the upload where it
> > left off. But since upgrading to slink, ncftp no longer seems to have
> > this option. Does anyone know what
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, David B. Teague wrote:
>
> In short, IF I understand the man page, ncftp does a reget by default, if
> a file has been partially fetched.
I've noticed that it also does that even if the file has been fully
fetched and you are trying to get a newer version
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
> I used to be able to continue an interrupted ftp upload in ncftp just
> by typing "put -C filename". It would continue the upload where it
> left off. But since upgrading to slink, ncftp no longer seems to have
> this optio
I used to be able to continue an interrupted ftp upload in ncftp just
by typing "put -C filename". It would continue the upload where it
left off. But since upgrading to slink, ncftp no longer seems to have
this option. Does anyone know what happened to it?
Che
On Sat, Dec 12, 1998 at 10:18:24AM +, Gossamer wrote:
> in the Debian version I have (3.0.0).
> Am I going nuts?
No, just need to RTFM. IIRC it is explained that the visual mode was
removed from ncftp 3.x. Personally, lftp is a much better client. It
doesn't have visual m
I'm -sure- I remember ncftp having a visual mode, where there
was a line for the command input at the bottom and a status line
and the rest of the screen for output ... but it doesn't exist
in the Debian version I have (3.0.0).
Am I going nuts?
bekj
--
: --Hacker-Neophile-Eclectic
I haven't been able to get a reply out of the author of ncftp
about this, so I figured I'd try the helpful people on this
list. My question is this. Is there any way in ncftp-3.0beta12 to set
the time it sleeps between redials? The default seems to alternate
within the 18-20 ran
For bo, both xfmail and ncftp exist in "non-free". You have to get them
from ftp -- they are not on the CD's. xfmail depends on the "forms"
library -- it is not GPL or open in any way. ncftp was the same way.
more recent releases are now GPL.
Darren wrote:
>
>
I tried installing the ftpwatch application. It said that ftpwatch requires
ncftp and ncftp isn't available...? is ncftp not bundled with debian? How
about xfmail? I didn't see that one, either.
--
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS d+(
On Wed, Apr 29, 1998 at 08:48:23AM -0400, Carroll Kong wrote:
> I think you can compile back in name completion. I got a bug where it
> would resume files improperly and append MORE data than the original file was
> supposed to have. (ncftp 3.0 beta 9)
Yes, it did have tha
On Tue, Apr 28, 1998 at 08:03:58AM -0400, David Morris wrote:
> I certainly am hoping the 3.0 version moves out of beta pretty soon. I
> did really like the bgget feature as well. And it only took a little
> looking at the help to find the pls command to page through long
> directory listings.
>
On "Tue, 28 Apr 1998 02:25:40 EDT." Norbert Veber wove together:
[snipped]
problem is that ncftp has been downgraded from 3.0b to 2.something, so
it
doesn't recognise those options, personally, I snagged the 3.0 deb from
one
of the mirrors before it was gone, and I use that (ma
I think you can compile back in name completion. I got a bug where it
would resume files improperly and append MORE data than the original file was
supposed to have. (ncftp 3.0 beta 9)
Carroll Kong
On Tue, 28 Apr 1998, Ted Cabeen wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 06:56:34PM -0600, Britton Leo Kerin wrote:
>
> When I do
>
>ncftp ftp.debian.org 2> error.log
>
> error.log looks like:
>
> Error: Unrecognized preference option "#".
> Error: Unrecognized preference option "#".
&g
On Tue, Apr 28, 1998 at 12:30:33AM -0500, Ted Cabeen wrote:
> >I think this is because you had NcFTP 3.0 (which was in non-free),
> >and have now upgraded to NcFTP 2.4.3 (now GPL).
>
> Yup, that's it. And its a good thing too, because 3.0 sucks. (No completion,
> n
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hamish Moffatt writes:
>On Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 06:56:34PM -0600, Britton Leo Kerin wrote:
>> error.log looks like:
>>
>I think this is because you had NcFTP 3.0 (which was in non-free),
>and have now upgraded to NcFTP 2.4.3 (now GPL).
recognized preference option "pager=less".
> Error: Unrecognized preference option "passive=optional".
> Error: Unrecognized preference option "progress-meter=2".
> Error: Unrecognized preference option "save-passwords=ask".
> Error: Unrecognized prefer
When I do
ncftp ftp.debian.org 2> error.log
error.log looks like:
Error: Unrecognized preference option "#".
Error: Unrecognized preference option "#".
Error: Unrecognized preference option "#".
Error: Unrecognized preference option "[EMAIL PROTECTED](
After upgrading to libc6 via the libc5-libc6 HOWTO, and running dselect to
install all the hamm packages, ftp or ncftp no longer works.
Here's what I see:
kanga:[21]~% ftp
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
kanga:[22]~% ldd /usr/bin/ftp
libreadline.so.2 => /lib/libreadl
On 10 Jun 1997, Alair Pereira do Lago wrote:
> > There already is a package with ncftp. It is in the non-free tree on any
> > decent debian-ftp-server. You won't find the non-free tree on most
> > "Cheap"-CDs like Cheap-Bytes
On Mon, 9 Jun 1997, Carl Fink wrote:
> Two questions:
I'll leave the other for someone else, since I installed dosemu by getting
the sources and compiling it myself.
>
> As for NcFTP -- can a mere newbie user request a new package? I'm
> used to NcFTP, which I've us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> There already is a package with ncftp. It is in the non-free tree on any
> decent debian-ftp-server. You won't find the non-free tree on most
> "Cheap"-CDs like Cheap-Bytes (I think) or Infomagic's (I know)
> (i.e. dosemu) that fdos is recommended, but not available. In fact, a
> search of the Debian FTP structure shows that there *is* no fdos
> package. What's up?
With the new package of dosemu, fdos comes as part of dosemu and
therefore isn't used as a separate package any more.
> As for NcFTP -- can a mere newbie user request a new package? I'm
> used to NcFTP, which I've used on Panix (Sun) and on my home machine
> under OS/2. Sure, I could compile it myself, but I'm afraid that as
> soon as I do, a package would be released and I
#x27;t on
: the C*B CD. I hear they leave stuff out, so I'm not shocked.
: However, dselect also insists that there's a "local" directory on the
: FTP site, which there is not. I'm confused.
: As for NcFTP -- can a mere newbie user request a new package? I'm
: used to
ckage.
What's up?
This is Debian 1.2.
On the same topic, dselect wants a "local" directory which isn't on
the C*B CD. I hear they leave stuff out, so I'm not shocked.
However, dselect also insists that there's a "local" directory on the
FTP site, which there
Hi,
> Did you take a look at either /debian/bo/binary/net and
> /debian/non-free/binary? I installed ncftp today so there
> obviously is a similar package. :-)
Nope. I was looking at Rex. I'll look at bo and non-free this time.
Regards,
E.-
--
Eloy A. Paris
Informat
On Apr 17, Eloy A. Paris wrote
> is there a package of the FTP client ncftp? The one that comes standard
> with Debian isn't as nice as ncftp.
Did you take a look at either /debian/bo/binary/net and
/debian/non-free/binary? I installed ncftp today so there
obviously is a simi
"Eloy A. Paris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> is there a package of the FTP client ncftp? The one that comes standard
> with Debian isn't as nice as ncftp.
Check in non-free. It's there.
--
Rob
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word &
Hi,
is there a package of the FTP client ncftp? The one that comes standard
with Debian isn't as nice as ncftp.
Thanks,
E.-
--
Eloy A. Paris
Information Technology Department
Rockwell Automation de Venezuela
Telephone: +58-2-9432311 Fax: +58-2-9431645 Cel.: +58-16-234700
"Where
; here's how i have my tree setup:
>
[pretty tree output snipped]
>
> i downloaded everything under `rex-fixed' aka Debian-1.2.1 and ended up
> with a bunch of symlinks.
>
> i am using ncftp to grab these.
>
> what am i doing wrong? (besides not orderin
From: Ioannis Tambouras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The symbolic link ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/rex/disks-i386/current
> is pointing at 1996-11-28/, instead of 1996-12-7/. I think that is
> incorrect.
Once the mirror is up to date it will point at 1996-12-8. Note that's 8,
not 7. The 1996-12-7 disks w
On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Ioannis Tambouras wrote:
>
> I need clarification on two issues:
[nsip]
>
> * I need to file a bug report for ncftp-2.4.2: the get -R command is not
> excecuted, I only get the prompt for the next command.
> Few days ago I was looking at a de
I need clarification on two issues:
* The symbolic link ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/rex/disks-i386/current
is pointing at 1996-11-28/, instead of 1996-12-7/. I think that is
incorrect.
* I need to file a bug report for ncftp-2.4.2: the get -R command is not
excecuted, I only
Marco Mariani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm using ncftp 2.3.0-7, and it tells me
>
> REST command not implemented.
>
> whenever I try to reget a file.
> What's the matter?
The ftpd daemon you're connecting to doesn't support the restart
comm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 31 Oct 1996, Marco Mariani wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm using ncftp 2.3.0-7, and it tells me
>
> REST command not implemented.
>
> whenever I try to reget a file.
> What's the matter?
Not all the servers implement
Hi all!
I'm using ncftp 2.3.0-7, and it tells me
REST command not implemented.
whenever I try to reget a file.
What's the matter?
All The Best,
Marco
GCS d?(-) H>+ s g+ p? !au a23 w+ v- C+++ US++ P+++ L++ 3 E- N+ K- !W
M !V -po+ Y+ t+ !5 !j R G''' tv- b++
54 matches
Mail list logo
