> On 2019-07-08 19:21 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>> I am trying to look which packages are new in buster that were not in
>> stretch. I am using aptitude since it't great tool for browsing packages.
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Beware that the list of new pac
On 2019-07-08 19:21 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I am trying to look which packages are new in buster that were not in
> stretch. I am using aptitude since it't great tool for browsing packages.
Beware that the list of new packages in buster is way too large to
browse ca
Hello,
I am trying to look which packages are new in buster that were not in
stretch. I am using aptitude since it't great tool for browsing packages.
until now it was easy:
do 'f'orget new packages in aptitude
change sources.list to point to new release
do 'u'pdat
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 02:42:20PM -0400, songbird wrote:
>> when you run:
>>
>> $ apt-get upgrade
>>
>> it will not add any new programs, but when you run:
>>
>> $ apt-get dist-upgrade
>>
>> it will tell you which are new of the updates it is
>> going to perform (if an
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 09:00:05PM +0100, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> Actually, it is in the man page of apt-get:
>
> -u, --show-upgraded
Hmm... missing in stretch. Present in jessie. Maybe stretch decided
to turn it on by default? (Stretch documents a "--no-show-upgraded"
option with no short equiv
On 23-03-17, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 02:42:20PM -0400, songbird wrote:
> > when you run:
> >
> > $ apt-get upgrade
> >
> > it will not add any new programs, but when you run:
> >
> > $ apt-get dist-upgrade
> >
> > it will tell you which are new of the updates it is
> >
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 02:42:20PM -0400, songbird wrote:
> when you run:
>
> $ apt-get upgrade
>
> it will not add any new programs, but when you run:
>
> $ apt-get dist-upgrade
>
> it will tell you which are new of the updates it is
> going to perform (if any).
I strongly recommend using t
Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all :-)
>
> is there a tool to see periodically new packages added to
> repository?(mainly I use testing)
>
> thanks!
when you run:
$ apt-get upgrade
it will not add any new programs, but when you run:
$ apt-get dist-upgrade
it will tell you wh
Hi.
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:17:18 +0100
Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all :-)
>
> is there a tool to see periodically new packages added to
> repository?(mainly I use testing)
aptitude forget-new
aptitude update
aptitude search ~N
Reco
Hi all :-)
is there a tool to see periodically new packages added to
repository?(mainly I use testing)
thanks!
Pol
pgrade but twice now
I've installed them and after I can't connect to the ISP. I've ruled out the
firewall. I use a cable modem only, eth0 no router. These are the NEW packages
sid wants to install:
isc-dhcp-client isc-dhcp-common libexiv2-9 libicu44 libmpfr4 libpodofo0.8.0
libwildm
at describes the necessary steps to
> create a new debian installer ISO including new packages?
I guess you could use simple-cdd for that:
http://wiki.debian.org/Simple-CDD/Howto
--
.''`. Wolodja Wentland
: :' :
`. `'` 4096R/CAF14EFC
`- 081C
including new packages?
Regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/893812.89466...@web28411.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
>Brian C wrote:
> Adrian Zaugg wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:09:30 -0800
>
>> PS: If you see the error:
>>
>> relocation error: /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3: symbol krb5_hmac, version
>> k5crypto_3_MIT not defined in file libk5crypto.so.3 with link time reference
>>
>> you were hit by the above mentioned
Adrian Zaugg wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:09:30 -0800
> PS: If you see the error:
>
> relocation error: /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3: symbol krb5_hmac, version
> k5crypto_3_MIT not defined in file libk5crypto.so.3 with link time reference
>
> you were hit by the above mentioned bug. To solve, do the fo
Packages that rely solely on Java or PHP are not problematic to install
from Testing. That's what I do here. The suggestion for apt_prefernces
Package: *
Pin: release a=testing
Pin-Priority: -1
does unfortunately not hinder dselect from installing libk5crypto3. Any
other suggestions?
Regards, A
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:46:31AM +0100, Adrian Zaugg wrote:
> Dear list
>
> How do I prevent apt in a mixed stable/testing environment from
> installing packages that first time appear in testing using apt-pinning?
As I posted, mixed system comes with negatives.
Let's look at different s
In <4b60d057.9020...@ente.limmat.ch>, Adrian Zaugg wrote:
>How do I prevent apt in a mixed stable/testing environment from
>installing packages that first time appear in testing using apt-pinning?
http://wiki.debian.org/AptPreferences
My setup is mostly stable on my server and (by now) mostly tes
Dear list
How do I prevent apt in a mixed stable/testing environment from
installing packages that first time appear in testing using apt-pinning?
Right now gcc-4.4-base would get installed on a mixed system by apt-get
upgrade, since it does arrange well with all required libraries found in
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 06:28:15PM +0200, Bernard wrote:
...
> I just tried something new... a really hazardous test... but since I was
> nearly ready to reinstall my Lenny, I thought I could take another
> chance.
>
> Since all error messages mentioned that 'ldconfig' was missing, I
> checked
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 13:11:09 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 19:06:41 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 00:09:07 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 16:58:53 +0200, Bernard wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 13:11:09 +0200, Bernard wrote:
[...]
> >>r...@new-host:/home/bd# dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.7-18_*.deb
> >>dpkg : « ldconfig » introuvable dans la variable PATH.
> >>dpkg: 1 prog
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 13:11:09 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 19:06:41 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 00:09:07 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 13:11:09 +0200, Bernard wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 19:06:41 +0200, Bernard wrote:
> >>Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 00:09:07 +0200, Bernard wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 20:26:06 +0200, B
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 19:06:41 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 00:09:07 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 20:26:06 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Before the end of install
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 19:06:41 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 00:09:07 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 20:26:06 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Before the end of install
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 19:06:41 +0200, Bernard wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 00:09:07 +0200, Bernard wrote:
> >>Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 20:26:06 +0200, Bernard wrote:
> Before the end of install process, I got
> this message :
>
>
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 00:09:07 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 20:26:06 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Before the end of install process, I got
this message :
"
Configuring libc6
[...]
Do you want to upgrade
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 00:09:07 +0200, Bernard wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 20:26:06 +0200, Bernard wrote:
>
> >>Before the end of install process, I got
> >>this message :
> >>
> >>"
> >>Configuring libc6
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >>Do you want to upgrade glibc now ?
> >>"
>
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 20:26:06 +0200, Bernard wrote:
I surely made a mistake trying to install 'audacity v1.3.8 beta'.
[...]
Since 'apt-get install audacity' told me that my already installed
1.3.5 beta version was the last version available, I decided to t
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 20:26:06 +0200, Bernard wrote:
> I surely made a mistake trying to install 'audacity v1.3.8 beta'.
[...]
> Since 'apt-get install audacity' told me that my already installed
> 1.3.5 beta version was the last version available, I decided to try
> 'testing' directories in my
Hi to Everyone !
I surely made a mistake trying to install 'audacity v1.3.8 beta'.
Someone told me that this new beta version was really different from
earlier releases, so I wanted to test it.
Since 'apt-get install audacity' told me that my already installed 1.3.5
beta version was the last
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 07:41:13AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > This is on testing. But I suspect the same will be true for sid.
>
> $ aptitude search '?new'
>
> ...although if you've never examined the list of new packages before,
> you might fi
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 08:38:25AM +0200, Johann Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Sometimes when I do 'aptitude update' I see that new packages are
> available. Is there a log somewhere which will inform me of which new
> packages are available?
>
On 08/13/08 01:38, Johann Spies wrote:
Sometimes when I do 'aptitude update' I see that new packages are
available. Is there a log somewhere which will inform me of which new
packages are available?
This is on testing. But I suspect the same will be true for sid.
apt-show-versions
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:50:53 +0300
"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johann Spies wrote:
> > Sometimes when I do 'aptitude update' I see that new packages are
> > available. Is there a log somewhere which will inform me of which new
>
Johann Spies wrote:
> Sometimes when I do 'aptitude update' I see that new packages are
> available. Is there a log somewhere which will inform me of which new
> packages are available?
>
> This is on testing. But I suspect the same will be true for sid.
try 'daptup
Sometimes when I do 'aptitude update' I see that new packages are
available. Is there a log somewhere which will inform me of which new
packages are available?
This is on testing. But I suspect the same will be true for sid.
Regards
Johann
--
Johann Spies Telefoon: 02
> hde: 0kB, 0/0/0 CHS, 0 kBps, 0 sector size, 45116 rpm
> But the hde is the floppy disk... Even if I tried to put the NETINST
> installation disk in the DVDROM, nothing happened (of course..)
dmesg |grep hd
what does show?
> I have only two partitions on a SCSI RAID: /dev/sda1 mounted on / ,
> an
Hi all,
I just did a minimum net-install to a server. Now when I tried to do
"apt-get install openssh-server", I saw the following error messages:
"After unpacking 569kB of additional disk sace will be used.
0% [Working ]hde: Invalid capacity for disk in drive
hde: 0kB, 0/0/0 CHS, 0 kBps, 0 sect
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:38:00PM -0600, William Jensen wrote:
> I'm following Etch and apt is reporting no new packages for a touch
> over a week.
I've been seeing the same behaviour over the past week or so, with
/etc/apt/sources.list configured with:
deb http://http.us.d
Nate Duehr([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> William Jensen wrote:
> >I'm following Etch and apt is reporting no new packages for a touch over a
> >week.
>
> Make sure your /etc/apt/sources.list is pointed at an official Debian
> mirror and if you ca
On Nov 29, 11:00 pm, William Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm following Etch and apt is reporting no new packages for a touch over a
> week.>From past experience I know that this is highly unlikely. Also, a
> friend runsnearly the same setup as I have and he
William Jensen wrote:
I'm following Etch and apt is reporting no new packages for a touch over a week.
From past experience I know that this is highly unlikely. Also, a friend runs
nearly the same setup as I have and he is still getting daily updates. Any ideas
what I could check/do?
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:38:00PM -0600, William Jensen wrote:
> I'm following Etch and apt is reporting no new packages for a touch
> over a week. From past experience I know that this is highly
> unlikely. Also, a friend runs nearly the same setup as I have and he
> is st
I'm following Etch and apt is reporting no new packages for a touch over a week.
>From past experience I know that this is highly unlikely. Also, a friend runs
nearly the same setup as I have and he is still getting daily updates. Any ideas
what I could check/do?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Ron,In addition to the Debian install sources, I also have:deb http://www.planet-moll.de/debian sarge main # for K3Bdeb
http://www.backports.org/debian/ sarge-backports main contrib non-free # for firefox & t-birdYou think it may have been installing some packages from backports instead
Thanks Mathias,Problem solved! Cheers,-GlenOn 8/29/06, Mathias Brodala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Hello again.> So you should try to manually install the current version of „kdepim-kio-plugins" and
> thereafter installWhat the heck happened here?So you should try to manually install the current ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Glen Yu wrote:
> Sorry, I guess I was looking for a generic solution and didn't think the
> actual package name mattered. But this is what I get (package =
> kdebase-kio-plugins (3.3.2-1sarge3)):
>
> Unpacking kdebase-kio-plugins (from
> kdebase-kio-
Hello again.
> So you should try to manually install the current version of
> „kdepim-kio-plugins“ and
> thereafter install
What the heck happened here?
So you should try to manually install the current version of
„kdepim-kio-plugins“ first
and thereafter install „kdebase-kio-plugins“.
Again
Hello Glen.
> Sorry, I guess I was looking for a generic solution and didn't think the
> actual package name mattered. But this is what I get (package =
> kdebase-kio-plugins (3.3.2-1sarge3)):
>
> Unpacking kdebase-kio-plugins (from
> kdebase-kio-plugins_3.3.2-1sarge3_i386.deb)
> ...
> dpkg - wa
oblem because --force enabled: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/kde3/kio_imap4.la`, which is also in package kdepim-kio-plugins<<>>On 8/29/06, Mathias Brodala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Glen.> Anyway,> as a result of that I can't install any new packages now because it
&
Hello Glen.
> Anyway,
> as a result of that I can't install any new packages now because it
> keeps telling me "xxx: Depends on yyy blah blah) and "apt-get -f
> install" doesn't fix anything because it just tries to install the
> package which failed befo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Glen Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A recent "apt-get upgrade" kinda failed because of some error (forgot what
> it was, but I think it was trouble overwriting some file). Anyway, as a
> result of that I can't install any new
Hi,A recent "apt-get upgrade" kinda failed because of some error (forgot what it was, but I think it was trouble overwriting some file). Anyway, as a result of that I can't install any new packages now because it keeps telling me "xxx: Depends on yyy blah blah) and "ap
I recently came across the new packages RSS feed, and I have noticed a small
problem with it. Frequently when a package appears on the feed and I click
on the link to get the the packages.debian.org page for the package, it is not
there. Would it not be possible to put the entries on the RSS
Wackojacko wrote:
[ ... ]
Like John I use Kpackage, but when i have looked at aptitude it is
originally setup to automatically install *recomended* packages by
default. You can switch this off in the UI, so i imageine it can be
configured via the CLI as well.
[ ... ]
|-R|, |--without-r
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 21:27, John O'Hagan wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 May 2006 14:59, rs wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> In other words, upgrade will hold back any package whose new version has
> new dependencies or requires the removal of any package. Dist-upgrade
> will install any new dependencies and remo
way to find out why, specifically, those packages are kept back?). So, I
tried "aptitude dist-upgrade" and it wants to install 695 new packages,
including the ones I do not currently have or want (e.g evolution, gnome (I
use KDE), exim, etc).
[...]
Am I missing something? How do I up
find out why, specifically, those packages are kept back?). So, I
> tried "aptitude dist-upgrade" and it wants to install 695 new packages,
> including the ones I do not currently have or want (e.g evolution, gnome (I
> use KDE), exim, etc).
[...]
> Am I missing something? How do I
"aptitude dist-upgrade" and it wants to install 695 new packages, including the
ones I do not currently have or want (e.g evolution, gnome (I use KDE), exim,
etc).
# aptitude update; aptitude dist-upgrade --show-versions --simulate --verbose;
336 packages upgraded, 695 newly installed, 3
I tried
"aptitude dist-upgrade" and it wants to install 695 new packages, including the
ones I do not currently have or want (e.g evolution, gnome (I use KDE), exim,
etc).
# aptitude update; aptitude dist-upgrade --show-versions --simulate --verbose;
336 packages upgraded, 695 newly in
On Sunday 09 October 2005 01:57 pm, Sara Massons wrote:
> Hello,
> I am using Debian testing. I am not a developper and not really
> skilled for installation processes (I usually follow the instructions
> to the letter and it works).
> I tried to install several things using "apt-get install" comma
Hello,
I am using Debian testing. I am not a developper and not really skilled
for installation processes (I usually follow the instructions to the
letter and it works).
I tried to install several things using "apt-get install" command (see
list below) and I always get an error message saying
Bryan Donlan wrote:
On 7/29/05, Guillaume TESSIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello.
I have a question about aptitude.
I use to run debian testing sarge and stick to sarge when it got stable.
I usually manage packages with aptitude.
Of course their was a "new packages"
On 7/29/05, Guillaume TESSIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have a question about aptitude.
> I use to run debian testing sarge and stick to sarge when it got stable.
>
> I usually manage packages with aptitude.
> Of course their was a "new packages
Hello.
I have a question about aptitude.
I use to run debian testing sarge and stick to sarge when it got stable.
I usually manage packages with aptitude.
Of course their was a "new packages" directory as new packages were
introduced on a regular basis to the debian repository.
Bryan Donlan wrote:
On 7/28/05, Nils-Erik Svangård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Heh.. I thought it was just my selection of packages. When I run apt-get
update; apt-get upgrade, I usually get atleast 10 upgrades per day, but
in recent days none of the packages I use has been updated. A first I
On 7/28/05, Nils-Erik Svangård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heh.. I thought it was just my selection of packages. When I run apt-get
> update; apt-get upgrade, I usually get atleast 10 upgrades per day, but
> in recent days none of the packages I use has been updated. A first I
> thougt the mirror
On 07/28/2005 09:49 pm, Alle Meije Wink wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My apt-get, although it appears to be working fine, has not found
> updated packages for the the last week. Is this because actually no
> packages have been updated or is there another reason?
There were two or three security updates yest
Heh.. I thought it was just my selection of packages. When I run apt-get
update; apt-get upgrade, I usually get atleast 10 upgrades per day, but
in recent days none of the packages I use has been updated. A first I
thougt the mirror I used stopped updating, so I changed to the main
archive, but
John Fleming wrote:
On Thursday 28 July 2005 04:49 pm, Alle Meije Wink wrote:
Hello,
My apt-get, although it appears to be working fine, has not found
updated packages for the the last week. Is this because actually no
packages have been updated or is there another reason?
Best wishes
Alle
On Thursday 28 July 2005 04:49 pm, Alle Meije Wink wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My apt-get, although it appears to be working fine, has not found
> updated packages for the the last week. Is this because actually no
> packages have been updated or is there another reason?
>
> Best wishes
> Alle Meije
>
>
>
Hello,
My apt-get, although it appears to be working fine, has not found
updated packages for the the last week. Is this because actually no
packages have been updated or is there another reason?
Best wishes
Alle Meije
___
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 02:22:53PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
[snip]
>
> What files on my hard drive do apt-cache reference to display that
> information? Perhaps if I back those up daily and later diff them.
What do you think about this?
grep-available . | grep-dctrl -sPackage,Version . > backup
I asked how to rediscover what packages are "really new" after you
change your sources.list and everything shows up as new in this message:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/debian-user-200401/msg05571.html
Aaron Hall suggested: http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/
I'm using that, but I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:08:59AM +0100, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> I've found a rather useful little app that doesn't appear to be in the
> distribution yet. How can I go about getting it in there? I have
> looked through the Debian policy page, but c
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:43:05AM +0100, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:45:22AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Certainly, if you're keen, you'd be welcome to apply to join the project
> > and do it yourself. However, that takes some time and implies a level of
> > long-term com
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:45:22AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Probably, although I'm not sure how that follows from your previous
> statement. If it were just a matter of getting the thing built for
> upload, you could build an unstable chroot to do that. For installing it
> on your system, as lo
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:08:59AM +0100, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> I've found a rather useful little app that doesn't appear to be in the
> distribution yet. How can I go about getting it in there? I have
> looked through the Debian policy page, but couldn't find what I was
> looking for.
http:
Hi all,
I've found a rather useful little app that doesn't appear to be in the
distribution yet. How can I go about getting it in there? I have
looked through the Debian policy page, but couldn't find what I was
looking for.
The other thing is that clearly it would need to go into unstable firs
when new packages
# are available
#
# 2003-03-10, Shaun Crossley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/bin/apt-get update -qq
/usr/bin/apt-show-versions -u | /usr/bin/sort | /usr/bin/mail -e \
-s "`/bin/hostname`: updated packages available" $ADMINMAIL
Oops... if you don
alerts when new packages
# are available
#
# 2003-03-10, Shaun Crossley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/bin/apt-show-versions -u | /usr/bin/mail -e \
-s "`/bin/hostname`: updated packages available" $ADMINMAIL
Oh, and by the way -- please change the ADMINMAIL line to use your
;-u" switch which eliminates the need for any grepping. I'm also not
doing any sorting, but that would be just one more addition in the
pipeline.
#!/bin/sh
# /etc/cron.daily/apt-show-versions: email alerts when new packages
# are available
#
# 2003-03-10, Shaun Crossley, [EMAIL PROTEC
On 10 Mar 2003 08:13:52 -0600
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 07:18, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 04:50, Konstantin Kostadinov wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > Is anyone knows is there are some scripts,binary that c
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 07:18, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 04:50, Konstantin Kostadinov wrote:
> > Hi
> > Is anyone knows is there are some scripts,binary that can notify for new
> > packages.
> >
> > Now I'm use apt-get update ; apt-get
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 04:50, Konstantin Kostadinov wrote:
> Hi
> Is anyone knows is there are some scripts,binary that can notify for new
> packages.
>
> Now I'm use apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade -u -d crontab entry but it is
> not very useful
Recently, I asked a qu
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:50:59 +0200
Konstantin Kostadinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> Is anyone knows is there are some scripts,binary that can notify for
> new packages.
>
> Now I'm use apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade -u -d crontab entry but
> it is not ve
Hi
Is anyone knows is there are some scripts,binary that can notify for new packages.
Now I'm use apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade -u -d crontab entry but it is not very
useful
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:03:50PM +, Richard Kimber wrote:
| I have not seen any new packages in testing for quite a long time. Is
| this because I'm using a mirror that's not being updated, or aren't there
| any?
There probably aren't any. It's possible that
there is a hangup with libc.
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:03:50PM +, Richard Kimber wrote:
> I have not seen any new packages in testing for quite a long time. Is
> this because I'm using a mirror that's not being updated, or aren't there
> any?
>
> Thanks,
>
I have not seen any new packages in testing for quite a long time. Is
this because I'm using a mirror that's not being updated, or aren't there
any?
Thanks,
- Richard.
--
Richard Kimber
http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
USM Bish wrote:
> console-apt (capt) does just that. It has three packet
> dividers:
>
> a) Updated packages
> b) Installed packages (newer version available)
> c) Non-installed packages
This is news to me. Are they in the order you list them? If so, I
probably just didn't notice the divider betw
console-apt (capt) does just that. It has three packet
dividers:
a) Updated packages
b) Installed packages (newer version available)
c) Non-installed packages
USM Bish
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:12:11PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> JH> AFAIK, deity and apt
er no to the continue
prompt if you want don't want to upgrade them all automaticaly.
If you want to find all new packages you could backup, ( I think this
is correct) you /var/lib/apt/lists directory before the each update,
then compare the backup directory to the newly downloaded list, or
wr
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JH> AFAIK, deity and aptitude do not single out newly available packages.
JH> Dselect, however, will do everything you want.
aptitude does call out newly available packages, though it considers a
package 'new' until the new list is explicitly cleared (with 'f
Graham Williams wrote:
> After doing an apt-get update there are two types of packages I'm
> particularly interested in: newly available packages (new to Debain
> since the last time I did an apt-get update) and packages I have
> already installed but that have been updated since the last time I di
After doing an apt-get update there are two types of packages I'm
particularly interested in: newly available packages (new to Debain
since the last time I did an apt-get update) and packages I have
already installed but that have been updated since the last time I did
an apt-get update. (I.e., ign
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 11:27:31PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 09:05:01PM +0100, Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > can I view a package's changelog without having to download it first?
> > This would be esp. useful for intended large do
on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 09:05:01PM +0100, Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can I view a package's changelog without having to download it first?
> This would be esp. useful for intended large downloads such as
> kernel-source-*; even kernel-doc-* is more than one meg to downl
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
