On 2005-12-22 15:07:50, Gerwin Bruner wrote:
The only thing which is not working is to get nlockmgr onto port 4001.
Is there any way to change the port? What did I miss out?
I think I successfully used sysctl for this once.
Felix
--
Felix C. Stegerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any sufficiently
Hi,sorry for bothering you.I'm not sure if this is the best place for this post. pls. let me know if not.I'm trying to map via nfs thru a firewall. I already managed to tie the nfs to port 2049, mountd to 4002.The only thing which is not working is to get nlockmgr onto port 4001.I tried to use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Elias wrote:
Hallo,
| Meine eigentlich Frage besteht nun darin, welche Ports ich für NFS
| freigeben muss. Wenn ich das richtig sehe, wird dazu RPC benötigt und
| soweit ich das verstanden habe, werden dabei dynamisch Ports
| zugeordnet. Ganz allgemein
Guten Abend in die Runde,
auf meinem Rechner würde ich gerne einiges per NFS freigeben, ihn aber
ansonsten trotzdem weiterhin mit einer Firewall schützen. Das Netz,
auf welchem die Freigabe erfolgt, ist zwar im Prinzip
vertrauenswürdig, aber man weiß ja nie, ob man im Moment irgend einer
Hallo,
ich habe mir eine Firewall mit guarddog eingerichtet. Allerdings kann
ich in meinem lokalen Netzwerk jetzt kein NFS mehr benutzen, obwohl ich
den NFS in guarddog freigeschaltet habe. Auch ssh funktioniert nicht,
aber das komischerweise vom Rechner mit der Firewall zum anderen
Rechner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
Hai,
I'm trying to secure my system, I ran pmfirewall and some tests.
It seems that rpc.mountd still listens on port 1024 even on the
outgoing ethernet.
I am trying hard to read up to this subject,
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 08:23:08PM -0500, Phil Brutsche wrote:
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
Hai,
I'm trying to secure my system, I ran pmfirewall and some tests.
It seems that rpc.mountd still listens on port 1024 even on the
outgoing ethernet.
...
I
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 06:01:09AM +0200, Sebastian Ritter wrote:
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
Hai,
I'm trying to secure my system, I ran pmfirewall and some tests.
It seems that rpc.mountd still listens on port 1024 even on the
outgoing ethernet.
'''
You can find a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 06:01:09AM +0200, Sebastian Ritter wrote:
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
Hai,
I'm trying to secure my system, I ran pmfirewall and some tests.
It seems
Hai,
I'm trying to secure my system, I ran pmfirewall and some tests.
It seems that rpc.mountd still listens on port 1024 even on the
outgoing ethernet.
I am trying hard to read up to this subject, but in the time being
I would feel much better if I were able to shut off *all* services
from this
that package to connect to an NFS
server; only if you're going to *be* the NFS server do you need it.
That will also happen so solve the problem of trying to firewall off the
NFS port: there won't be anything to firewall off.
My setup is a firewall and several local machines on a local net
11 matches
Mail list logo