On 2015-04-29, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
On 04/28/2015 09:51 PM, Marco Segura wrote:
I think use aptitude or apt is more a personal decision than any other
thing, however I believe aptitude is more powerful.
--
Marco T. Segura M.
«Cuando naciste, todos reían y solo tu
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:21:53AM -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
I actually miss the good'ol days of dselect. Apart from that I've been using
a combination of apt for small tasks and synaptic for large numbers of
packages.
For me, those good old days never ended. I still use dselect. :)
--
I think use aptitude or apt is more a personal decision than any other
thing, however I believe aptitude is more powerful.
--
Marco T. Segura M.
«Cuando naciste, todos reían y solo tu llorabas, asegurate que al
morir, todos lloren y solo tu rías.»
Confucio
On Mon,
On 04/28/2015 09:51 PM, Marco Segura wrote:
I think use aptitude or apt is more a personal decision than any other
thing, however I believe aptitude is more powerful.
--
Marco T. Segura M.
«Cuando naciste, todos reían y solo tu llorabas, asegurate que al
morir, todos lloren y solo tu
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:40:37 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 27 April 2015 11:35:42 Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 03:22:33AM -0300, Teresa e Junior wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 19:16:24 -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
I'm considering going back to apt, even though most of the
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 03:22:33AM -0300, Teresa e Junior wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 19:16:24 -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
I'm considering going back to apt, even though most of the advice I've
read on apt vs aptitude leans in favor of the latter. After this
experience, I've lost trust in
On Monday 27 April 2015 11:35:42 Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 03:22:33AM -0300, Teresa e Junior wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 19:16:24 -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
I'm considering going back to apt, even though most of the advice I've
read on apt vs aptitude leans in favor of the
I actually miss the good'ol days of dselect. Apart from that I've been
using a combination of apt for small tasks and synaptic for large
numbers of packages.
On 04/27/2015 08:21 AM, Teresa e Junior wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:40:37 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 27 April 2015 11:35:42
I think the reason some prefer apt is that aptitude has more finely grained
dependency handling and the dependencies have grown tremendously over the
years (over 40,000 discrete packages now). Even though apt will not break
anything, it's never a bad idea to use aptitude as it always offer
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 19:16:24 -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Teresa e Junior
teresaejun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 17:35:29 -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
$ apt-cache policy sudo
sudo:
Installed: 1.8.5p2-1+nmu2
Candidate:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Teresa e Junior
teresaejun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 19:16:24 -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Teresa e Junior
teresaejun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 17:35:29 -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
$ apt-cache
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 17:35:29 -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
$ apt-cache policy sudo
sudo:
Installed: 1.8.5p2-1+nmu2
Candidate: 1.8.5p2-1+nmu2
Version table:
*** 1.8.5p2-1+nmu2 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.8.5p2-1+nmu1 0
500
I'm trying really, really, really hard to keep my system mostly within
stable, but I must be doing something completely wrong, because at the
moment my system is infested with 100 packages that are not from
stable, and that I am 10% certain I did not explicitly install.
These uninvited
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Teresa e Junior
teresaejun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 17:35:29 -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
$ apt-cache policy sudo
sudo:
Installed: 1.8.5p2-1+nmu2
Candidate: 1.8.5p2-1+nmu2
Version table:
*** 1.8.5p2-1+nmu2 0
14 matches
Mail list logo
