Re: oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-26 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:34:21AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Does this mean that apt-cache reads the local database + the server > repositories rather than the just the server repositories? I tend to > see that as a bug, not a feature, as it leads people,

Re: oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-24 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:45:12 -0400 Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Florian Kulzer wrote: > > I think many people would not like it if apt-cache no longer found the > > local packages, custom kernels, etc. If a package is still installed > > then its information is included in apt's package

Re: oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-23 Thread Freddy Freeloader
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 23:11 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 13:47:50 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: > > Florian Kulzer wrote: > > [...] > > >> I think many people would not like it if apt-cache no longer found the > >> local packages, custom kernels, etc. If a package is s

Re: oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-23 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 13:47:50 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: > Florian Kulzer wrote: [...] >> I think many people would not like it if apt-cache no longer found the >> local packages, custom kernels, etc. If a package is still installed >> then its information is included in apt's package cac

Re: oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-23 Thread Freddy Freeloader
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:34:21AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: Florian Kulzer wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:08:22 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: Does this mean that apt-cache reads the local database + the server repositories rather than

Re: oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-23 Thread Freddy Freeloader
Florian Kulzer wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:34:21 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: Florian Kulzer wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:08:22 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: I have three separate machines that have identical entries in /etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated

Re: oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-23 Thread Joey Hess
Florian Kulzer wrote: > I think many people would not like it if apt-cache no longer found the > local packages, custom kernels, etc. If a package is still installed > then its information is included in apt's package cache, and "apt-cache" > bases all its results on this cache. It does not query t

Re: oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-23 Thread Douglas Allan Tutty
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:34:21AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: > Florian Kulzer wrote: > >On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:08:22 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: > Does this mean that apt-cache reads the local database + the server > repositories rather than the just the server repositories? I ten

Re: oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-23 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:34:21 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: > Florian Kulzer wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:08:22 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: >> >>> I have three separate machines that have identical entries in >>> /etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated and upgraded this mornin

Re: oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-23 Thread Freddy Freeloader
Florian Kulzer wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:08:22 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: I have three separate machines that have identical entries in /etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated and upgraded this morning as a result of troubleshooting this issue. On machine #1 I can apt-cache sh

Re: oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-23 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:08:22 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: > I have three separate machines that have identical entries in > /etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated and upgraded this morning as a > result of troubleshooting this issue. On machine #1 I can apt-cache show > nhfsstone and i

Re: oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-23 Thread Freddy Freeloader
Joe Hart wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Freddy Freeloader wrote: I have three separate machines that have identical entries in /etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated and upgraded this morning as a result of troubleshooting this issue. On machine #1 I can apt-cache sh

Re: oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-23 Thread Liam O'Toole
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:08:22 -0700 Freddy Freeloader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have three separate machines that have identical entries in > /etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated and upgraded this morning as > a result of troubleshooting this issue. On machine #1 I can > apt-cache show n

Re: oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-23 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Freddy Freeloader wrote: > I have three separate machines that have identical entries in > /etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated and upgraded this morning as a > result of troubleshooting this issue. On machine #1 I can apt-cache > show nhfsstone a

oddity in apt-cache

2007-04-23 Thread Freddy Freeloader
I have three separate machines that have identical entries in /etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated and upgraded this morning as a result of troubleshooting this issue. On machine #1 I can apt-cache show nhfsstone and it returns the expected data on nhfsstone. On machines 2 and 3 it tells