On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:34:21AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Does this mean that apt-cache reads the local database + the server
> repositories rather than the just the server repositories? I tend to
> see that as a bug, not a feature, as it leads people,
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:45:12 -0400
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > I think many people would not like it if apt-cache no longer found the
> > local packages, custom kernels, etc. If a package is still installed
> > then its information is included in apt's package
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 23:11 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 13:47:50 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> > Florian Kulzer wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> I think many people would not like it if apt-cache no longer found the
> >> local packages, custom kernels, etc. If a package is s
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 13:47:50 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
[...]
>> I think many people would not like it if apt-cache no longer found the
>> local packages, custom kernels, etc. If a package is still installed
>> then its information is included in apt's package cac
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:34:21AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:08:22 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Does this mean that apt-cache reads the local database + the server
repositories rather than
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:34:21 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:08:22 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I have three separate machines that have identical entries in
/etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated
Florian Kulzer wrote:
> I think many people would not like it if apt-cache no longer found the
> local packages, custom kernels, etc. If a package is still installed
> then its information is included in apt's package cache, and "apt-cache"
> bases all its results on this cache. It does not query t
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:34:21AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:08:22 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Does this mean that apt-cache reads the local database + the server
> repositories rather than the just the server repositories? I ten
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:34:21 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:08:22 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
>>
>>> I have three separate machines that have identical entries in
>>> /etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated and upgraded this mornin
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:08:22 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I have three separate machines that have identical entries in
/etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated and upgraded this morning as a
result of troubleshooting this issue. On machine #1 I can apt-cache sh
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:08:22 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> I have three separate machines that have identical entries in
> /etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated and upgraded this morning as a
> result of troubleshooting this issue. On machine #1 I can apt-cache show
> nhfsstone and i
Joe Hart wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I have three separate machines that have identical entries in
/etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated and upgraded this morning as a
result of troubleshooting this issue. On machine #1 I can apt-cache
sh
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:08:22 -0700
Freddy Freeloader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have three separate machines that have identical entries in
> /etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated and upgraded this morning as
> a result of troubleshooting this issue. On machine #1 I can
> apt-cache show n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> I have three separate machines that have identical entries in
> /etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated and upgraded this morning as a
> result of troubleshooting this issue. On machine #1 I can apt-cache
> show nhfsstone a
I have three separate machines that have identical entries in
/etc/apt/sources.list. All were updated and upgraded this morning as a
result of troubleshooting this issue. On machine #1 I can apt-cache
show nhfsstone and it returns the expected data on nhfsstone. On
machines 2 and 3 it tells
15 matches
Mail list logo