Re: off topic: uptime question

2017-11-01 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙)
> This function is made for the formatting of *dates*, not *time intervals. > > That would mean that you might get even funnier results if your uptime > is more than (around) 30-31 days. I did understand. For now my chromebook uptime is over 30 days, thanks! Sincerely, Byung-Hee. -- ^고맙습니다 _白衣從

Re: off topic: uptime question

2017-11-01 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙)
In Article <17430759904711630...@scdbackup.webframe.org>, "Thomas Schmitt" writes: > [...] > (You should better compute the time interval days from the seconds > difference. %d will probably rollover at 31.) Thank you for good point, indeed;;; Sincerely, Byung-Hee. -- ^고맙습니다 _白衣從軍_ 감사합니다_^)

Re: off topic: uptime question

2017-10-23 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Byung-Hee wrote: > uptime = Time.at(uptime_data).utc.strftime("%d days %H:%M") > Ruby: 28 days 09:23 (Tue Sep 26 15:19:58 +0900 2017) > Bash: 00:43:33 up 27 days, 9:23, 0 users, load average: 0.01, 0.10, 0.21 Google sent me to https://apidock.com/ruby/DateTime/strftime My guess is that

Re: off topic: uptime question

2017-10-23 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:50:03AM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙) wrote: > #+BEGIN_SRC ruby > require "date" > > uptime_data = IO.read('/proc/uptime').split[0].to_i > sboot = Time.now - uptime_data > > if uptime_data >= 86400 > uptime = Time

off topic: uptime question

2017-10-23 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙)
#+BEGIN_SRC ruby require "date" uptime_data = IO.read('/proc/uptime').split[0].to_i sboot = Time.now - uptime_data if uptime_data >= 86400 uptime = Time.at(uptime_data).utc.strftime("%d days %H:%M") else uptime = Time.at(uptime_data).utc.strftime("%H:%M") end puts uptime.to_s + "