Oops, my bad, I was reading old messages.
--
When you say that you agree to a thing in principle, you mean that
you have not the slightest intention of carrying it out in practice.
-- Otto Von Bismarck
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 09:25:21AM -0800, Sreelal Chandrasenan wrote:
Isn't this the same ID10T that had all his email forwarded to the list
a few days ago?
--
When you say that you agree to a thing in principle, you mean that
you have not the slightest intention of carrying it out in practice.
On Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 12:43 AM, ScruLoose wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 05:37:01PM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
I just found this ... and want it ... bad.
Thought some of you might find it of interest:
http://www.linuxjewellery.com/catalogue/DBV/
That's pretty sweet.
"Geek chic"
-Original Message-
From: Terry Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:27 AM
To: debian users
Subject: Re: PDF spec (Was: Re: ooh! debian jewelry)
On Sunday 14 December 2003 07:31 pm, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 at 15:54 GMT, J.H.M. Das
On Sunday 14 December 2003 07:31 pm, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 at 15:54 GMT, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) penned:
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 14:08:21 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> >> Hrm, I could have sworn that PDF was a spec published by Adobe and
> >> freely usable, but google s
Monique posts:
>> I could have sworn that PDF was a spec published by Adobe and freely
>> usable, but google seems to disagree
Should the PDF format be used and recommended by governments? The
Govt. of India is calling for opinions and this link is interesting
http://gnu.org.in/philosoph
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 at 15:54 GMT, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) penned:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 14:08:21 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>> Hrm, I could have sworn that PDF was a spec published by Adobe and
>> freely usable, but google seems to disagree.
>
> Google isn't quite the all-seeing eye yet.
>
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 22:50:32 -0600,
Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I attended media production classes
> for staff at Caltech in which making maximum use of these
> PDF 5 features was *really* pushed hard (sometime last year).
> No doubt they had also
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:56:45 -0600, Terry Hancock wrote:
> I accessed this without registering because you provided a deep-link, but
> normally, Adobe makes you go through a forms process to get this far,
> AFAICT.
Nope. I very vaguely recalled it being available on "developer.adobe.com"
(whic
On Sunday 14 December 2003 09:54 am, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> http://partners.adobe.com/asn/tech/pdf/specifications.jsp has e.g.
> the PDF Reference, Fourth Edition, Version 1.5 (1172 pages). xpdf seems to
> handle the "Acrobat 5" version of it just fine.
Hmm. Yes, that's very interesting. I
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 14:08:21 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> Hrm, I could have sworn that PDF was a spec published by Adobe and freely
> usable, but google seems to disagree.
Google isn't quite the all-seeing eye yet.
http://partners.adobe.com/asn/tech/pdf/specifications.jsp has e.g.
the P
On Saturday 13 December 2003 10:11 pm, Nunya wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:08:07PM -0600, Terry Hancock wrote:
> > It would be conceivable to call PDF 4 an open standard, since
> > Ghostscript can already handle it. But we really ought to make
> > a distinction, since the newer versions are
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:08:07PM -0600, Terry Hancock wrote:
> It would be conceivable to call PDF 4 an open standard, since
> Ghostscript can already handle it. But we really ought to make
> a distinction, since the newer versions are incompatible.
Or, I could even quote the right paragraph.
[
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:08:07PM -0600, Terry Hancock wrote:
>
> This is equally true of DOC format, too, though. We *could* adopt
> some prior version of it as a standard, seeing as several open
> word processors can handle them already.
Many PDFs I get don't display correctly in gv.
The Calo
On Saturday 13 December 2003 03:08 pm, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> Oops. Hrm, I could have sworn that PDF was a spec published by Adobe
> and freely usable, but google seems to disagree. It references some old
> links from the adobe site, but they seem to have been removed.
PDF 5.x is supposed to
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 at 21:00 GMT, Gregory Seidman penned:
>
> That is entirely FUD. PDF is no more nor less open than PostScript.
> Both PostScript and PDF are industry standards developed, promoted,
> and documented by Adobe. A Google search for "pdf specification" turns
> up the Adobe PDF specif
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 at 20:36 GMT, Terry Hancock penned:
>
> Furthermore, PDF isn't really an open data format, just a closed one
> that turned out to be easier to crack than .doc files. Adobe isn't
> any nicer about sharing their standards than Microsoft is. The fact
> that we have good Linux re
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 02:36:10PM -0600, Terry Hancock wrote:
} On Saturday 13 December 2003 12:46 pm, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
} > On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 at 03:00 GMT, Greg Madden penned:
} > > http://debian.org/logos/
} > Ooh. I was wondering where to find logos.
} >
} > Why eps as opposed to pdf
On Saturday 13 December 2003 12:46 pm, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 at 03:00 GMT, Greg Madden penned:
> > http://debian.org/logos/
> Ooh. I was wondering where to find logos.
>
> Why eps as opposed to pdf or whatever?
Well, for one reason, postscript is an older and more widesp
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 at 03:00 GMT, Greg Madden penned:
>
> For a do-it yourself (sort-of) Debian Swirl go to Kinko's (print shop).
> They do cut vinyl, fairly cheep, bring in a .esp logo from http://
> debian.org/logos/. I put one on my work van :)
Ooh. I was wondering where to find logos.
Why
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:08:45 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:30:35AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 at 05:01 GMT, Scarletdown penned:
>> > That's pretty cool. I also recommend this site as well...
>> >
>> > http://scotgold.com/acatalog/ScotGold_Cat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 December 2003 11:30 pm, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 at 05:01 GMT, Scarletdown penned:
> > That's pretty cool. I also recommend this site as well...
> >
> > http://scotgold.com/acatalog/ScotGold_Catalogue_Linux_Tux_St
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 05:08, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:30:35AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 at 05:01 GMT, Scarletdown penned:
> > > That's pretty cool. I also recommend this site as well...
> > >
> > > http://scotgold.com/acatalog/ScotGold_Catalog
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:30:35AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 at 05:01 GMT, Scarletdown penned:
> > That's pretty cool. I also recommend this site as well...
> >
> > http://scotgold.com/acatalog/ScotGold_Catalogue_Linux_Tux_Stuff_2.html
>
> Ah, some neat stuff, and muc
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 02:30, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 at 05:01 GMT, Scarletdown penned:
> >
> > That's pretty cool. I also recommend this site as well...
> >
> > http://scotgold.com/acatalog/ScotGold_Catalogue_Linux_Tux_Stuff_2.html
>
> Ah, some neat stuff, and much more b
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 at 05:01 GMT, Scarletdown penned:
>
> That's pretty cool. I also recommend this site as well...
>
> http://scotgold.com/acatalog/ScotGold_Catalogue_Linux_Tux_Stuff_2.html
Ah, some neat stuff, and much more budget-friendly. But tell me, does
anyone ever actually wear cufflin
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 05:37:01PM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> I just found this ... and want it ... bad.
>
> Thought some of you might find it of interest:
>
> http://www.linuxjewellery.com/catalogue/DBV/
That's pretty sweet.
"Geek chic" to a whole new level!
Cheers!
--
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Scarletdown wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2003 at 17:37, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>
> > I just found this ... and want it ... bad.
> >
> > Thought some of you might find it of interest:
> >
> > http://www.linuxjewellery.com/catalogue/DBV/
one can drag solder flux in the debian logo
On 10 Dec 2003 at 17:37, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> I just found this ... and want it ... bad.
>
> Thought some of you might find it of interest:
>
> http://www.linuxjewellery.com/catalogue/DBV/
>
> --
> monique
That's pretty cool. I also recommend this site as well...
http://scotgold.
I just found this ... and want it ... bad.
Thought some of you might find it of interest:
http://www.linuxjewellery.com/catalogue/DBV/
--
monique
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
30 matches
Mail list logo
