Re: ot: best filesystem for small files

2000-12-08 Thread Nate Amsden
Phil Brutsche wrote: > Except that the reiserfs patches wreak havoc on Ingo Molnar's raid patches > (which are IMO needed to get any decent software raid setup working), or > they did the last time I tried them together (during the summer). should work ok with the "stock" raid though right? (the

Re: ot: best filesystem for small files

2000-12-08 Thread Rogerio Brito
On Dec 08 2000, S.Salman Ahmed wrote: > I agree, 2.4.0-test11 has been working really well for me too. It > was the only way to get my UDMA100 HD on my Asus CUSL2 board to work > in UDMA mode. You could also use André Hedrick's patch to 2.2.x kernels, which includes the Promise dri

Re: ot: best filesystem for small files

2000-12-07 Thread Phil Brutsche
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > i am going to be building 3 new mail servers using cyrus imap on debian > 2.2 and linux 2.2. looks like cyrus stores each mail in a file which > means the filesystem will have tens, or even

ot: best filesystem for small files

2000-12-07 Thread Nate Amsden
i am going to be building 3 new mail servers using cyrus imap on debian 2.2 and linux 2.2. looks like cyrus stores each mail in a file which means the filesystem will have tens, or even hundreds of thousands of really small files. so, what is the best filesystem for something like this? or should